Never said that.. I said surveillance people who have actually become politicians.. Yet I never told you any of the complete ideas, just a tiny fractions of them.. Another part of this would be that politicians need to be dedicated people, dedicate themselves to the state and the people, and partly live in isolation. Thats how dedicated I want politicians to be, to blindly and willingly dedicate themselves to the state, much like soldiers.
Never said that, said PARTLY elitist or MOSTLY.. Any of them is better than the current, mostly morons.
Probably nothing like always, just blindly following the ideas that have been pushed onto you. I excuse you, you probably do not know better.
Yes, anyone who might disagree with you is just plain ignorant, right?
Of course, the integrity that have been pushed on you tells you this, and ignores the fact that I havent even told you 1/100th of what the total reforms into politics and economics need to be.. You just assume a bunch of things and put a label on me because I do not agree with you. And you just assume that I want to kill people.
I didn't say that you personally wanted to kill people. I've been pretty clear in saying that what you
espouse did, in fact, in the 20th century, lead to 150 million people being killed.
But I know -- you think you can do it better and avoid all that.
How many lives have the democratic ways of the US taken over the past 10 years? Isnt it 1 million something?
There's more leftist fantasy, this idea out there that supposedly a million Iraqi civilians have died since the US invasion.
Even if such a preposterous number could be substantiated, it includes:
1) Every single person who's died from any cause whatsoever, including old age.
2) People who were killed by the activities of insurgents (the majority of violent deaths).
3) People killed in ordinary crime (which will still exist under your system).
4) The insurgents themselves.
Nothing about "democracy" is responsible for those deaths except for the ones our military killed, and the
vast majority of those were combatants. The accidental civilian deaths are terrible and regrettable, but they weren't a result of "democracy." "Democracy" didn't order those deaths.
The 150 million people killed to which I refer were those killed
intentionally and
directly by their own governments.
How many has it saved? NONE.
Yeah. Tell that to anyone saved by a medical technique or technology developed here. To someone who would have been fed into one of Saddam's wood chippers. And so on, and so on. Really, this particular statement is simply too stupid to spend much time on.
Yet democracy is just another form of dictatorship, it certainly doesn't empower the people, any ideas that I have about politics REALLY will empower the people, not pretend to do so.
It empowers any population which cares to take its civic responsibility seriously.
Nor will it have a single leader like the "democratic" US have.
You really are clueless. No, I mean, really.
My idea will empower the people, because it will make politics local and changes to make people involved in politics, it will also party be populism and mass referendums to anything which is not short term politics.
If you don't think that's what we have here, then you really don't understand much about it. That's the whole point of the federalist system.
Yes, I just want to prove a point. I assume, you have assumed things all the time.. You assume most of what you are answering to, you certainly have no clear idea of my ideas and ideals.
I have responded to that which you have said.
I never said its new ideas, I just say I have MY OWN ideas. I am no sheep like you. I couldnt care less if its not new ideas. But the total of my ideas certainly are only my own, and new. Just because you do not understand the total of it, doesnt mean my integrity is anywhere near as robotic as yours.
Apparently, to you, "robotic" means cherishing individual liberty as my core value. Noted.
Like a good robot, you see some similarities, you ignore the reality and slap a brand on things. LAZY...
You dont even know 1% of my total idea, yet you are willing our of ignorance to brand me as fascist.
PAAAAAA The tic.
Give me a reason to think you're not. Because everything you've said about what you'd do leans that way. You've said you'll keep freedom, but the mechanism you have said you'll put into place rather belies that.
