Neither side in an argument can find the truth when both make an absolute claim on it.
A socialist with redistribution on his mind.
Joe stood there and listened, then countered, and at the very end had BHO drop the nugget that gave us insight to who Obama is. A socialist with redistribution of wealth as his game plan.
Joe did what the press didn't want to do... in 5:27.
We need more Joe's asking questions... the press largely having become cheerleaders for BHO, and abrogating their role as reporters in the process.
He should have moderated at least one debate.
Last edited by zimmer; 01-19-09 at 11:56 AM.
The Welfare state is...
....a political system based on the premise that the government (and not the individual, corporations, or the local community) has the responsibility for the well being of its citizens, by ensuring that a minimum standard of living is within everyone's reach. This commitment is translated into provision of universal and free education, universal medical care, insurance against disability, sickness, and unemployment, family allowances for income supplement, and old age pensions.
...a concept of government in which the state plays a key role in the protection and promotion of the economic and social well-being of its citizens. It is based on the principles of equality of opportunity, equitable distribution of wealth, and public responsibility for those unable to avail themselves of the minimal provisions for a good life.
I ask again:
Since you have a plenary opposition to the legislation of morality, you then oppose the welfare state -- right?