Originally Posted by SWM
I have NOTHING against these "charitable" acts. My argument is that they usually illustrate a failed political belief that GIVING someone something for nothing results in less poverty.
Perhaps instead of building substandard housing no one will care for, we could have used the money to build special schools to teach these people how to read and write and obtain the job skills they will need to succeed?
"You get what you pay for" is a tired old Cliche, but it sure rings true when you get free **** and start bitching about it.
Tucker Case - Tard magnet.
Originally Posted by Jerry