- Joined
- Dec 14, 2008
- Messages
- 36,235
- Reaction score
- 8,380
- Location
- Georgia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
And the government has a public interest to make establishments as safe as possible.
When it starts infringing on our rights they have overstepped and are at that point only taking liberty.
Surely even you don't think 100% capitalism is effective. That was done away with 200 years ago.
Of course not. But the US government has gone berserk.
I think medical organizations can evaulate that evidence a little better than unelected judges can.
So you are ignoring the bulk of the data I posted, and saying you are smart enough to evaluate the evidence but judges are not?
You are talking to a cycle commuter. I strongly favor much higher standards on automotive emmissions.
Screw you hippy!
Even if that first statement were true, and it isn't according to many researchers, the fact that it could exaccerbate pre-existing conditions is reason enough for concern.
Yes there is reason for concern, but not restricting it by law.
Typical government over reaction much like guns.
Here, I am talking about a home free of a known cancer-causing poison.
Oh you mean like Radon?