• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Businesses sue so it can be easier for them to hire illegals.

jamesrage

jamesrage

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
36,705
Reaction score
17,867
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Oh gee what a surprise, traitorous scum suing so it can be easier for them to hire illegals.It just amazes the audacity that these pro-illegals have.

InternetNews Realtime IT News - Businesses Sue Homeland Security Over E-Verify
In a move that might impact national security recommendations made to the incoming Obama administration, business groups have filed suit against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, says it is illegal for the DHS to force federal contractors and subcontractors to use its E-Verify online system, which lets employers check the work status of new hires.

The suit is being led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, with the Associated Builders and Contractors, the Society for Human Resources Management, the American Council on International Personnel, and the HR Policy Association as co-plaintiffs.

Participation in E-Verify was voluntary, but President Bush signed an executive order in June that made its use mandatory starting January 15, 2009 for contractors who hired anyone during the term of a contract with the federal government, whether the hires were assigned to work on the federal contract or not.
 
jamesrage said:
Oh gee what a surprise, traitorous scum suing so it can be easier for them to hire illegals.It just amazes the audacity that these pro-illegals have.
Click to expand...

I've asked you this a bunch of times and you always seem to run off. Why is it you call them traitorous? Who are we at war with that they are aiding and abetting? Or do you use 'traitorous' like pro-lifers use 'Human beings'? To incite emotion?

As far as the story goes. Good for them. Businesses shouldn't have to pay you more just cause you're born in this country. If somebody can do it for less. Let em at it.
 
Hatuey said:
I've asked you this a bunch of times and you always seem to run off. Why is it you call them traitorous? Who are we at war with that they are aiding and abetting? Or do you use 'traitorous' like pro-lifers use 'Human beings'? To incite emotion?
Click to expand...

I have stated many times that encouraging another nation to invade yours regardless if it is a armed or unarmed invasion is a act of treason.20 million plus illegals most of whom are from Mexico as a result of scum hiring them.


As far as the story goes. Good for them. Businesses shouldn't have to pay you more just cause you're born in this country. If somebody can do it for less. Let em at it.
Click to expand...

I thought democrats were supposed to support the working class while the evil republicans support the rich? Letting businesses undermine the local working class by illegally hiring outside labor does not help the local working class.
 
jamesrage thought! Quote
(I thought democrats were supposed to support the working class )

Now whatever would have given you pause to think that?

Quote
(while the evil republicans support the rich?)

Wealth acquired by the (rich) inevitably trickles down to the poorer and from them to the poor.

Quote
(Letting businesses undermine the local working class by illegally hiring outside labor does not help the local working class.)

It may not help the local working class who are demanding ever more recompense for evermore less work, it does however assist the local economy and through that the National economy.
Without Local Businesses the Unemployment rate in the US would be at a vastly higher percentage than it currently stands at.
If the Local worker demands more than the Local Business can afford to do business at, then that Local Business closes down.
It is all solely a case of supply and demand.
If you are unable to understand this then I might suggest you read back numbers of Newspapers of the years 1930 - 1935.
Your education may be immeasurably improved.
 
jamesrage said:
I have stated many times that encouraging another nation to invade yours regardless if it is a armed or unarmed invasion is a act of treason.20 million plus illegals most of whom are from Mexico as a result of scum hiring them.
Click to expand...

More emotion inciting. Please show why they are traitorous and not just because you think teh Mexicunz r invadun.

I thought democrats were supposed to support the working class while the evil republicans support the rich? Letting businesses undermine the local working class by illegally hiring outside labor does not help the local working class.
Click to expand...

If you want to cookie cutter a democrat then yes in theory. However I don't follow party lines to the letter. Want to try again?
 
Hatuey said:
As far as the story goes. Good for them. Businesses shouldn't have to pay you more just cause you're born in this country. If somebody can do it for less. Let em at it.
Click to expand...

However this rule isn't for all businesses, its for business's who specifically contract out with the U.S. Government. And yes, I think if you are going to be taking TAX PAYER money than you should be expected to go to extra lengths to verify that you are not BREAKING THE LAW.

I understand, your sentiment. I kind of wonder if you are in favor of the minimum wage while you sit here talking about letting people do something for less if they want/can do it?

But the fact is the second part of your post is arguing against not this particular law in question mandating that government contractors use this service, but in regards to illegal laws all together. Once again, I can understand your stance there even if I don't agree. What I don't understand is why you have such disregard for the law? Or do you believe that business does not like a particular law they are free to ignore it and ignore other laws that force verification of it? Shall we allow employeers to ignore Affirmative Action requirements? Or requirements in regards to non-discrimination? What about laws about the saftey of the work environment? I mean, if they can run their business with less quality equipment, more power to them right? And they can kick out the OSHA people when they come to check because they shouldn't have to worry about it in the first place.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom