• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UK work time opt-out under threat

Nice to see the 2003 figures again.. Does it make you feel better, the times America was second?
Take a look at the list for 2007...

List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The US is 12th in IMF and 10th in CIA list.. France is just a few places behind in both, and they also have a social system, free health care and all those things.

A few places would be 3.

France 18, 14 and 21. US 12, 10 and 12.

6, 4 and 9 places is not a few.

They have a social system? What is that?

Free health care and all those things? What are "all those things?"

This still does not explain why they need to subsidize on a large scale.
 
Last edited:
A few places would be 3.

France 18, 14 and 21. US 12, 10 and 12.

6, 4 and 9 places is not a few.

They have a social system? What is that?

Free health care and all those things? What are "all those things?"

This still does not explain why they need to subsidize on a large scale.

Its a few when the difference in GDP is so small.. A few percentage points only.

All those things is the French social system that for example pays for child sitting and cleaning of your house if you have children. It also actually pays you money for each child(when born and each month) so that you don't get strained with cash, it also pays for childcare, kindergarten, school. This is just to mention a few of thousands of benefits the French enjoy and still they can affordto subsidize some companies, and still they can afford to not use all their time for work, and still they have almost the same GDP as the US(annually), and as a result of all these things they have a much higher hourly GDP than any western nation(including other European nations with similar but not as good social systems as the French)..
 
If this were the case why do large French company's need to be subsidized by the government?

:shock:

What does it have to do with anything?

France was ranked 21 in 2004, the US was number 2.

World Facts and Figures - GDP per capita by country

This really shows how completely you ignored everything I wrote...

My First Post said:
I'm pretty sure French GDP Per Capita per hour worked is higher than the US's. Americans work more hours, but the French accomplish more per hour, the reason US GDP is higher is down to quantity of work, not quality. It actually begs an interesting question as to what would happen if the French did work a similar number of hours, would France become a richer country than the US?

NationMaster - Encyclopedia: List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita per hour

France = 3, USA = 4
 
:shock:

What does it have to do with anything?



This really shows how completely you ignored everything I wrote...

This is exactly why I have learned to ignore that guy, you will be better of doing the same..
 
:shock:

What does it have to do with anything?

I mean I was wondering if the French people are doing well, why do the company's need subsidizing? Could it be they are paying to much for to little?

This really shows how completely you ignored everything I wrote...

NationMaster - Encyclopedia: List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita per hour

France = 3, USA = 4

Because I missed "per hour" I am ignoring it? It is obvious I did not understand what you were saying.

Excuse me for misunderstanding what you meant. No need to be an ass about it.

Jees you people are thin skinned.
 
Its a few when the difference in GDP is so small.. A few percentage points only.

It is 3000 to 5000 dollars in difference. Multiplied by the population of each country it is indeed a large difference.

All those things is the French social system that for example pays for child sitting and cleaning of your house if you have children. It also actually pays you money for each child(when born and each month) so that you don't get strained with cash, it also pays for childcare, kindergarten, school. This is just to mention a few of thousands of benefits the French enjoy and still they can affordto subsidize some companies, and still they can afford to not use all their time for work, and still they have almost the same GDP as the US(annually), and as a result of all these things they have a much higher hourly GDP than any western nation(including other European nations with similar but not as good social systems as the French)..

In the end this is why the French pay such high taxes and why they keep getting higher.
 
It is 3000 to 5000 dollars in difference. Multiplied by the population of each country it is indeed a large difference.

Its not a large difference if you consider the French have much shorter work days in average and weeks more of vacation every year.


In the end this is why the French pay such high taxes and why they keep getting higher.


Yep, but in the US much of the same things are private paid, and if you count those costs it accounts to more, especially health care. You would be surprised to know that French taxes arent even among the highest in Europe, not really that high at all..
 
Why do you assume things you know NOTHING about?

I'm going off your argument.

Everyone have to work overtime every day, and preferably work weekends to be able to keep up with everyone else.; I guess we are just one step further from what you are..

Did you not write this? You're claiming all this aggregate affects as reasons why you people are in the trouble that we don't have in our country. That people are trying to keep up with others and that process has become prohibitively expensive. That's your claim, that is what you have written down, that is your argument. Don't come screaming at me having a tizzy fit because of it. Also, your personal situation doesn't affect your argument because your argument is an AGGREGATE effect, that's how you talk of it. You personally don't have any impact on the argument. Your aggregate argument is that some small group of people worked a lot, got money, and started buying things. This drove prices up (I already had shown how this couldn't actually work the way you claim, but you've never responded to that), other people then had to work more to afford things, this drove up prices, etc. This is aggregate effects. You may be doing well, but you still perceive a problem. People have to work, preferably on the weekends too, to keep up with everyone else. Your words, your argument; deal with it. Nothing says that one has to keep up with anyone else. You personally may not do it, but enough people in your society do to have caused it to get to a point in which you think the government needs to step in and do something about it. I don't care about you personally. You can't disprove an aggregate claim (and it's your aggregate claim anyway) by citing individual examples.

As I said, get some unions going if this is a real problem. Otherwise, if you're going to use government it would be better to use it market side than labor side.

I AM HAPPY about 30 hours, I MANAGE DAMN fine with it.. Are you not sick of the way you assume people think?
Its about me, if you started readin some of my posts you would possibly understand what I am saying, but yoo are unfocused and clearly just want to come up with another personal attack.. I am making more than average people even with a 30 hour week, thats not the issue like ive said to you 100 times now.. But what about Norway? you didnt understand the example, everyone have to work overtime in order to afford to live even a simple life..

It angers me the ability of people here to ignore what is actually said and continue their prejudice rant.[/quote[

I find it funny that you ignore your very own arguments just to launch into an attack. Present your arguments in a clear and precise manner if you don't wish to be misunderstood.

Of course they dont, but you dont accomplish in an hour what they do

I will damned well gaurnatee you right here and right now that I get done well more in an hour than most people do in the day. Don't sit there and think scientists are lazy. We're not working 12+ hours a day because we're not accomplishing anything. My productivity is well above the common French worker.

.. Its like you say in France also, everyone there can work better than the next man and he will keep his job, but they ALSO have social security which you dont.. They have in fact everything that you have and a ton of extra good stuff as well.

Like social immobility? You know why the Muslim sector in France riots all the time? It's not because Islam is violent. It's because the construct of the French workplace prohibits them from entering. They are kept poor on purpose, kept in their place. The French have hard time replacing workers because their rules can't get rid of ineffective workers already in the market place. Therefore, the younger generation can not break in as easily. All the rules are set up against mobility. Placate enough people, and they'll never raise their fist to you. But it's not all peaches and cream there. Nothing ever is, there is no perfect system. There will always be rich and there will always be poor. I say the better system is one which allows turn over. Let the rich get poor if they don't work. Let the poor get rich if they do work. Social and financial mobility are key. France doesn't have this, socialist countries on the whole don't have this. Free market capitalism does. Everything has strengths, everything has weaknesses. You can sit there and cite the French all you want, but that's not a system I want. They don't take care of everybody, it's in fact built upon stagnation. Stagnation is death.

Thats why your veterans sleep on the streets..

There are a few things which go into that one, but yes our work system is one of the contributors.
 
Did you not write this? You're claiming all this aggregate affects as reasons why you people are in the trouble that we don't have in our country. That people are trying to keep up with others and that process has become prohibitively expensive. That's your claim, that is what you have written down, that is your argument. Don't come screaming at me having a tizzy fit because of it. Also, your personal situation doesn't affect your argument because your argument is an AGGREGATE effect, that's how you talk of it. You personally don't have any impact on the argument. Your aggregate argument is that some small group of people worked a lot, got money, and started buying things. This drove prices up (I already had shown how this couldn't actually work the way you claim, but you've never responded to that), other people then had to work more to afford things, this drove up prices, etc. This is aggregate effects. You may be doing well, but you still perceive a problem. People have to work, preferably on the weekends too, to keep up with everyone else. Your words, your argument; deal with it
.

Finally you understand, this is the situation in the country I am from, which I moved away from because it was so silly and people just work all the time, people are angry if they need to take a minute away from work or "waste" any of their precious spare time.
I just cant handle the country, I am not like that, I dont want to be a slave, I prefer to be a free man, and guess what, I am, and I am far better of than most people in my country(fortunately and unfortunately).

Nothing says that one has to keep up with anyone else. You personally may not do it, but enough people in your society do to have caused it to get to a point in which you think the government needs to step in and do something about it. I don't care about you personally. You can't disprove an aggregate claim (and it's your aggregate claim anyway) by citing individual examples. .

Most of the time, if you don't work 60+ hours a week you cant even afford to live, so yes, everyone has to follow up. The possibilities of making it big(business unfriendly) are also very limited in my home country which makes the situation even more unbearable, because you have no choice, you just have to work all the time.
Its a shameful thing to be aware of, especially when the slaves don't know it them self and are "happy" to remain in slavery in lack of better options and possibilities. Only solution is to move from the country.
If we change to the Euro and become member of the EU much will change, we will regain freedoms, prices will fall, competition increase, monopolies fall and unambitious isolation policies be gone. The people would instantly be freed from slavery as a result of collapsing prices and become instantly rich rather than just the state being rich.
Some months after we become member of the EU I will probably move back to a completely new and better country that hopefully have the new EU work limit law in place.


As I said, get some unions going if this is a real problem. Otherwise, if you're going to use government it would be better to use it market side than labor side.
Norway is one of the strongest unionized countries in Europe, clearly that doesn't work.

I find it funny that you ignore your very own arguments just to launch into an attack. Present your arguments in a clear and precise manner if you don't wish to be misunderstood.

I was just angry with the way you looked at my 30 hour work week(claiming I am lazy) and had an over emotional answer(and missed one word).. ("not about me")


I will damned well gaurnatee you right here and right now that I get done well more in an hour than most people do in the day. Don't sit there and think scientists are lazy. We're not working 12+ hours a day because we're not accomplishing anything. My productivity is well above the common French worker.

I admire scientists, I never said you were lazy.. But apparently French scientists are just more effective when they are at work(and its not as often as American colleagues).

Why cant you accomplish what you do in 12 hours in say 8 hours? What exactly is it you do? Wait around for results and such? You cant be working hardcore the whole 12 hours, I would think(perhaps of prejudice) that you are working in a relaxed pace rather than intense.


Like social immobility? You know why the Muslim sector in France riots all the time? It's not because Islam is violent. It's because the construct of the French workplace prohibits them from entering. They are kept poor on purpose, kept in their place.

I am aware of this problem, but its deeply rooted in the system, there arent for example many qualified immigrants compared with French counterparts, but they want the same jobs and blame "racial and ethnic" issues when the problem is rather with the way they are integrated from the beginning. Over generations this difference means less and less, and with high qualified immigrants they usually get the same jobs as native French. I guess they have become the "American blacks" of Europe. Social desperation creating more social desperation.. But this is a result of most of them having no skills set when they arrive and it just continues in a bad spiral. Proper education is no available to the people of the ghettos and they don't get out of the ghettos because they cant get proper education.

The French have hard time replacing workers because their rules can't get rid of ineffective workers already in the market place. Therefore, the younger generation can not break in as easily. All the rules are set up against mobility. Placate enough people, and they'll never raise their fist to you. But it's not all peaches and cream there. Nothing ever is, there is no perfect system.

Its because of traditions. But its all changing now, fast, the French job system is becoming more flexible.


There will always be rich and there will always be poor. I say the better system is one which allows turn over.

This is the problem, you have 3 classes in France, the poor, the large middle class and the rich.
Its difficult to move up in any of these classes, but possible to move down. The poor are mostly first, second and third generation immigrants, only the third have a chance at moving up to the middle class, but its rare. The middle class are mostly the native French and they cant move unto the upper class because those are people whom have been rich for generations. So its very inflexible.
I believe its about the same in the US but a bit more flexible between middle class and rich and the possibility of moving from the poor class to the rich immediately. But its difficult for example for the blacks and Hispanics to move to the middle class and you have a large part of natives whom belong to the poor class unlike France where its almost just immigrants in comparison.


Let the rich get poor if they don't work. Let the poor get rich if they do work. Social and financial mobility are key. France doesn't have this, socialist countries on the whole don't have this. Free market capitalism does. Everything has strengths, everything has weaknesses. You can sit there and cite the French all you want, but that's not a system I want. They don't take care of everybody, it's in fact built upon stagnation. Stagnation is death.

Never said the French are perfect, but its a damn good system compared with most, especially for the French and the middle class.

Aside from that I think the only solution to the class problem is to have new policies in inheritance. Many rich people are morons whom have done nothing to get where they are and are just wasting the money.. Sure they deserve to have a safe life that their fathers provided to them, but I believe personally that inheritance must be somewhat limited so secure them a comfortable life and then let the rest go to the state and redistribution. To be a little more raw everyone deserve to start from scratch and have no inheritance, but this would be unfeasible.


There are a few things which go into that one, but yes our work system is one of the contributors.

You just need a better social protection system, thats all. Veterans should be treated as heroes and rewarded as such, they have never done anything wrong(except criminals among them), its rather politicians whom should end up on the streets.
 
In the end this is why the French pay such high taxes and why they keep getting higher.

Not exactly true.

According to KPMG's individual tax rate survey of 2008, France does not have much higher tax rate than the US.

KPMG - Corporate and indirect tax rate survey 2008

Needs PDF to read.

But the basics is that France has 40% and the US has 35%.

Considering that the US citizen also has to pay for healthcare, then the US tax rate is "low" and incomparable with the French one, which has universal healthcare in it.

One could easily claim that the average French person has more disposable income than the average US person that pays healthcare insurance to achieve the same coverage as the French person.
 
What he says is true.. And all those other benefits are also included, those I mentioned for example, along thousands of others.. The French are almost spoiled by their government.. ;)
 
BTW, Max; I'll tell you this. French scientists aren't working the hours you claim, they work hours I work. Scientists are scientists. I've personally worked with many scientists from several countries (one in fact was French), we always put in many many hours. And it is rigorous work too. It may be "relaxed" in that there isn't a person standing over your shoulder shouting at you all the time (though that does happen). But it's a ton of work, way more work than many people regardless of country could deal with. We're always doing it, there's a puzzle and it needs to be solved and you want to be the one to solve it; that's how it works. No scientist puts in 30 or even a mere 40 hours a week, they'll lie on their time sheet to make it look like the work less before they actually work less.

Also, I know lots of people who work well over 60+ hours and it's not just to "live". Top notch lawyers (and this is true regardless of country as well) put in way way way more than that. Way more than that. And they're rich, so it's not to live; it's to do a job and do it well and do it better than anyone else. The labor restrictive rules basically tell someone "no, you can not be better than anyone else".
 
BTW, Max; I'll tell you this. French scientists aren't working the hours you claim, they work hours I work. Scientists are scientists. I've personally worked with many scientists from several countries (one in fact was French), we always put in many many hours. And it is rigorous work too. It may be "relaxed" in that there isn't a person standing over your shoulder shouting at you all the time (though that does happen). But it's a ton of work, way more work than many people regardless of country could deal with. We're always doing it, there's a puzzle and it needs to be solved and you want to be the one to solve it; that's how it works. No scientist puts in 30 or even a mere 40 hours a week, they'll lie on their time sheet to make it look like the work less before they actually work less.

Also, I know lots of people who work well over 60+ hours and it's not just to "live". Top notch lawyers (and this is true regardless of country as well) put in way way way more than that. Way more than that. And they're rich, so it's not to live; it's to do a job and do it well and do it better than anyone else. The labor restrictive rules basically tell someone "no, you can not be better than anyone else".

I never actually said scientitist in France only work 35 hours..

Whats the point of being rich if you cant live your life? I feel sorry for those lawyers.

Working more is not "being better than someone else".
 
I HAVE FREEDOM, I LOVE FREEDOM.. WHY DO YOU SAY I DONT? DID I EVER SAY I DIDNT?
Why don't you support people having the freedom of people to negotiate their own contracts?

Nope, but I am HAPPY about the PROTECTIOn the EU gives rather than the LACK of protection and brainwashing the US government CLEARLY gives you..
I don't need the government to protect me. I'm perfectly capable of talking to my employers and negotiating my own hours. If my employer disagrees I can leave whenever I like.

It angers me to see the way you do "intellectual debate"..

geee..
It bothers me that you can't explain why people in Europe aren't allowed to work the hours they choose to.

I cant explain it because its too cryptic the way Americans debate..

1 Someone says something
2 American claims what that someone has said and rephrase it to fit his own image
3 American pounds on his own wrong quotation of that someone
4 Someone proves him wrong
5 American goes into national pride mode and picks apart 1 of 50 facts
6 American then starts debating that 1 fact instead of original context
7 The Someone is dragged into another debate and another and another until the American is eventually right about something
8 The someone tries to get back to the point, the broader picture, the context of everything
9 American is tunnel visioned into what he sees as him winning the debate because he was right about something
10 American starts ranting on about loads of irrelevant things and avoids the original context and the broader debate
11 The someone desperately tries to get back on track and debate in an intellectual fashion
12 The American high on himself starts the personal attacks
13 The someone who is right about what he is saying just gives up trying to prove anything to the American because he will not listen to what he is saying.


Conclusion.. There is a major issue with how you people debate on this forum. You put misquoted opinions into people. You rephrase things to fit you vision of things, go on with personal attacks and stays away from looking at the facts. You never admit that someone else is right even when they clearly are..
When have I misquoted you? If you feel like it go through my posts and show how I've done this to you. As is you sound like a child throwing a tantrum.

It just pisses me off enormously. Dont be emotional, be intellectual!
Where was I emotional?

This is not really about you RightOfCenter, because you usually don't do these things, but you doing it was the creaming of the angry cake, I'm rather disappointed with you, dont follow in the footsteps of idiots, use your brain man.
Trust me, I am using my brain. I truly want to know why you feel that people aren't smart enough or unions aren't powerful enough to negotiate their own contracts with their employers? Why does the government have to do it for them?
 
BTW, Max; I'll tell you this. French scientists aren't working the hours you claim, they work hours I work. Scientists are scientists. I've personally worked with many scientists from several countries (one in fact was French), we always put in many many hours. And it is rigorous work too. It may be "relaxed" in that there isn't a person standing over your shoulder shouting at you all the time (though that does happen). But it's a ton of work, way more work than many people regardless of country could deal with. We're always doing it, there's a puzzle and it needs to be solved and you want to be the one to solve it; that's how it works. No scientist puts in 30 or even a mere 40 hours a week, they'll lie on their time sheet to make it look like the work less before they actually work less.

Also, I know lots of people who work well over 60+ hours and it's not just to "live". Top notch lawyers (and this is true regardless of country as well) put in way way way more than that. Way more than that. And they're rich, so it's not to live; it's to do a job and do it well and do it better than anyone else. The labor restrictive rules basically tell someone "no, you can not be better than anyone else".

What exactly does a physicist do?
 
Whats the point of being rich if you cant live your life? I feel sorry for those lawyers.

And I feel sorry for fundamentalist Christians and telemarketers. Doesn't mean I want the government to ban Chirsitanity or telemarketing.

Living your life simply means doing what you want to. If what you want to do isn't harmful to anyone else, especially if it's productive (i.e. work), then why can't you do it?
 
Why don't you support people having the freedom of people to negotiate their own contracts?

Because many people are weak loosers, because the majority of people are dumb and prone to exploitation.
Why dont we just take away all government laws and regulation and see what happens? They were there for a reason in the first place, and there is a reason for this new law, which I have explained to you several times my opinions as to the reasons and even some of the stated reasons. If you want to know more I suggest you read up on it yourself.

Europa - Search - Results
Rapid - Press Releases - EUROPA
Rapid - Press Releases - EUROPA

I don't need the government to protect me. I'm perfectly capable of talking to my employers and negotiating my own hours. If my employer disagrees I can leave whenever I like.

You, no, me, no, somebody yes.. Just because me and you don't need this doesn't mean other people do not, its meant as protection for the weak.. Example:
Commission acts on excessive working time in Greece - EC

It bothers me that you can't explain why people in Europe aren't allowed to work the hours they choose to.

They can..

Where was I emotional?

You were, I also were, stupid of me to react in such a way.. Sorry.

Trust me, I am using my brain. I truly want to know why you feel that people aren't smart enough or unions aren't powerful enough to negotiate their own contracts with their employers? Why does the government have to do it for them?

Unions sucks, they dont cover all work, governments can cover ALL forms of work.. Why do we need unions exactly?

Aside, I already told you unions have a weak position in many European countries.
 
What exactly does a physicist do?

Physics.

>.>

<.<

It actually depends on what you like. Me, I'm an AMO type of guy (atomic, molecular, and optical physics). So my research is focused on laser cooling and trapping of atoms and Bose-Einstein condensation. Great stuff, great stuff. I'd never want to do anything else.

The people I mostly know are research scientists which means exactly as the title states. We do research, apply for grants and develop new investigations and understanding. Physics tends to be a more "pure" science, in that it's not being developed with any one product in mind; but rather to study and investigate the base nature of specific dynamics. There's tons and tons of applied science, but you can't have applied science without base science. It's one of the few reasons I think one proper action of government is to fund scientific research. Base science in and of itself is not profitable. It's applied science that is, but you can't advance applied science without base science.
 
And I feel sorry for fundamentalist Christians and telemarketers. Doesn't mean I want the government to ban Chirsitanity or telemarketing.

Living your life simply means doing what you want to. If what you want to do isn't harmful to anyone else, especially if it's productive (i.e. work), then why can't you do it?

I feel sorry for them to, and fundamentalists in general. Perhaps we should regulate it? :lol:

Many people are being exploited, that isn't ok, this upper limit to work will help many people.

Aside from that, living a life of only work is rather unproductive.
 
Last edited:
I never actually said scientitist in France only work 35 hours..

Your rhetoric definitely suggested otherwise.

Whats the point of being rich if you cant live your life? I feel sorry for those lawyers.

You'd have to ask them. I imagine to them law is like science to me. There are certain things in this life that you just love to no end and you want to do. Competition brings this out a lot, and law is competitive (as is science, but probably not quite to the same extent). I'd feel sad for anyone whom didn't have a passion that could consume them if they weren't careful.

Working more is not "being better than someone else".

Depends on what you're doing...even for the factory lineman it can be. Science it is. You don't get anywhere in this field by doing less than the guy next to you. You always have to perform, you always have to work, you always have to produce. New science, new papers, new understanding; gotta happen. If you have pride in your work, then it's definitely about being better than someone else. Maybe that's the fundamental difference.
 
Because many people are weak loosers, because the majority of people are dumb and prone to exploitation.
Why dont we just take away all government laws and regulation and see what happens?
Then unions will work with companies and regulate themselves. This is the way it should be.

They were there for a reason in the first place, and there is a reason for this new law, which I have explained to you several times my opinions as to the reasons and even some of the stated reasons. If you want to know more I suggest you read up on it yourself.

Europa - Search - Results
Rapid - Press Releases - EUROPA
Rapid - Press Releases - EUROPA
These don't answer my questions at all. You still haven't told me why unions can not or individuals can not do this themselves.



You, no, me, no, somebody yes.. Just because me and you don't need this doesn't mean other people do not, its meant as protection for the weak.. Example:
Commission acts on excessive working time in Greece - EC
Excuse me for not respecting the weak. Join a union or get a different job.



Unions sucks, they dont cover all work, governments can cover ALL forms of work..
Find me a profession that doesn't have a union. I can't think of one type of work that doesn't have a union.

Why do we need unions exactly?
To negotiate benefits for workers.

Aside, I already told you unions have a weak position in many European countries.
Why are they so weak? Because governments think they know what's best for the people and don't allow them to solve their own problems.
 
Excuse me for not respecting the weak. Join a union or get a different job.

So you are saying that you have no respect for your fellow man, since almost every single person is weak when it comes to a negotiation between company vs person??...............including yourself.. unless you are the company.

Find me a profession that doesn't have a union. I can't think of one type of work that doesn't have a union.

US President!

Why are they so weak? Because governments think they know what's best for the people and don't allow them to solve their own problems.

Wow, now that is just a warped wrong view of Europe.

Being "weak" is a relative term, and I think Max does not make this clear enough (if he means it and he should).

In a negotiation between a big ass company and a worker, the worker, like it or not, is the weak party. The company has the financial muster and the overall knowledge to exploit the worker and before unions most companies did so. An example, a company can claim "sorry we cant give you a raise because we are loosing money".. the worker has to take the companies word in most cases, because the worker does not have the resources or the schooling often, to know if that claim is correct or not. With a union, then you have that possibility.

The idea of a union, or joining forces among workers, is to be in a stronger negotiating position against the strong part in the negotiation, aka the company.

This law, was put in place to battle worker exploitation by companies and it has worked. If a person wants to work him or herself to death, fine go do it, nothing in Europe will prevent you in doing that. Have 2 jobs, or 3. I know many who work 12 hours a day for example, 6 days a week, but that is because they like their jobs and want to do so. But if a company told someone, you have to work 56 hours a week, including weekends, then this law (and similar) prevents companies from demanding this and using this as an excuse to get rid of the person... and it also makes sure that those that do accept to work longer, get compensated for their extra work.. something that was not always present before.

And governments in Europe do not know or claim to know what is best for people, nor do they try to impose something on us. This idea that American's have about Europe is just wrong and totally false.

The way we run our countries is not much different than how the US is run, with the exception we actually have transparency and accountability :2razz: here. I can set up a business wherever and whenever I want. I can move where ever and when ever I want. I can choose my doctor and dentist. In fact I can not see anything radically different between Europe or America on how life "goes on".
 
Back
Top Bottom