As posted before:There are plenty of good arguments to oppose the NMD. Such as:
1. This doesn't reduce the risk of a nuclear attack since the main threat doesn't come from missiles in the first place.
Threat A, Defense A...
Same response as above.2. Every dollar spent on the NMD is one dollar less that can be spent on something that will actually protect Americans
Really.3. The cost-benefit analysis is absurd. The marginal benefit of having a NMD (even if it worked perfectly) is simply not worth the marginal cost of building and maintaining it.
What's the cost of a 250kt weapon going off over Los Angeles?
False. The 50 or so warheads the NMD is designed to stop doesnt affect anyone's deterrence.4. The National Missile "Defense" is actually an offensive weapons system, because if it worked it would eliminate the nuclear deterrent of other nations.
See above.5. There is no need to make Russia (or other nuclear powers) panic and do something stupid.
There's no support for the argument that it doesn't work.6. It doesn't work.