• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Freedom House calls for investigation

I knew this day would come, when you come in here defending your darling corrupt Abian - you're true colors are showing in just the kind of hyperpartisan you actually are.
It really doesn't matter what Chiu says though, his statement was rubbish :beatdeadhorse: To begin with.
The only shameless behavior I see here is your attempt in defending this sack of **** corrupt political head.
I'd love to see what you say about the hidden safe found in his house.

I am defending his right to a fair trial. Please tell me what is wrong with that?

On the other hand, your beloved KMT - the entire party - is little more than a pile of cow excrement.
 
Last edited:
I am defending his right to a fair trial. Please tell me what is wrong with that?
Right, of course you were, because we all know that a fair trial has so much to do with approval numbers:lamo
 
Right, of course you were, because we all know that a fair trial has so much to do with approval numbers:lamo

Approval numbers driven down by years of lies from KMT liars like Chiu Yi and prosecutors playing trial by media. If the prosecutors were so confident that they had the evidence to convict Chen, why don't they seek an indictment? Why don't they let the judicial process play out? No, they are playing trial by media with Pan-Blue media outlets seeking to prejudice the response to any future verdict (if any) in Chen's alleged corruption cases.

Absolutely shameless activity. The prosecutor's actions would have been condemned by a judge MONTHS ago in the US and Chen would either have been indicted or set free in any country that respects the human rights of citizens on its national territory.
 
Approval numbers driven down by years of lies from KMT liars like Chiu Yi and prosecutors playing trial by media.
Which again, have what to do with a fair trial?? Has any law pertaining to his rights or this case been violated?

ludahai said:
If the prosecutors were so confident that they had the evidence to convict Chen, why don't they seek an indictment? Why don't they let the judicial process play out? No, they are playing trial by media with Pan-Blue media outlets seeking to prejudice the response to any future verdict (if any) in Chen's alleged corruption cases.
Are any singleone of the legislatures interferring with the investigation in any way whatsoever? Yes, abian is still in custodey because of the judicial process.
Abian's approval was not driven down by lies, it's why he's in prison now.
But don't worry, that court call - it's coming this week:2wave: Have fun with it.

ludahai said:
Absolutely shameless activity. The prosecutor's actions would have been condemned by a judge MONTHS ago in the US and Chen would either have been indicted or set free in any country that respects the human rights of citizens on its national territory.
Oh cry me a river, I can't believe you're here making apologetic for this sack of **** - were this anyone in the pan blue you'd be barking your little head off regardless of evidence or not.
I've asked you before show me anywhere that the prosecutor has violated procedure or violated any rights of abian? None, none of his rights have been violated, everything pertaining to the case and his confinement have been in complete accordance with the law.
It's quite telling of your hyperpartisan here, when you're apologetically screaming rights of this sack of **** - toss the book at him and lock him up till there's no tomorrow.
You have absolutely 0 credibility
 
Last edited:
Which again, have what to do with a fair trial?? Has any law pertaining to his rights or this case been violated?

No law has been violated, which only goes to show that the KMT laws in Taiwan are NOT passed with protecting civil and human rights in mind. A government that respects human and civil rights would not hold one of its citizens in prison on its national territory without charge for more than a month. Legal - yes. Equally an indication of the disdain for which the KMT holds civil rights and the rights of the accused.

Are any singleone of the legislatures interferring with the investigation in any way whatsoever? Yes, abian is still in custodey because of the judicial process.

We don't know. We DO know he is in jail without charge. Did this happen in the Chen administration?

Abian's approval was not driven down by lies, it's why he's in prison now.
But don't worry, that court call - it's coming this week:2wave: Have fun with it.

Actually, a lot of the approval drop WAS driven by lies and drivel from the KMT. Regardless of it being unroven allegations of corruption (some of the accusations are now known to be FALSE) to the lies about the poor economic performance of the country.

Oh cry me a river, I can't believe you're here making apologetic for this sack of **** - were this anyone in the pan blue you'd be barking your little head off regardless of evidence or not.

No, I am consistent. I believe in innocent until proven guilty. I did NOT argue for the imprisonment of Ma while HE was under indictment and at trial. There are FIVE KMT legislators who have had their elections annulled by the courts - and all five are still holding their seats. Now, MOFA is covering up a document that indicates that two more legislators have dual citizenship, and thus are illegally holding their seats.

I've asked you before show me anywhere that the prosecutor has violated procedure or violated any rights of abian? None, none of his rights have been violated, everything pertaining to the case and his confinement have been in complete accordance with the law.

Laws written by the KMT and which do not meet international standards for human and civil rights.

It's quite telling of your hyperpartisan here, when you're apologetically screaming rights of this sack of **** - toss the book at him and lock him up till there's no tomorrow.
You have absolutely 0 credibility

I have said before that if he is found guilty in a fair trial that he SHOULD be locked up. I am merely arguing for his rights as a citizen of Taiwan. I am arguing for basic human rights. Ma's statemets that Taiwan is the freest country in the world is comical considering the recent actions of his government.

YOU are the one with ZERO credidility. You are the partisan hack here. I am merely arguing for the protection of his civil rights. I would do the same for a member of the KMT (and in fact, I have)
 
No law has been violated, which only goes to show that the KMT laws in Taiwan are NOT passed with protecting civil and human rights in mind. A government that respects human and civil rights would not hold one of its citizens in prison on its national territory without charge for more than a month. Legal - yes. Equally an indication of the disdain for which the KMT holds civil rights and the rights of the accused.
KMT Laws? Remind me again but which party exactly was in power for 8 years from 2000~2008?

ludahai said:
We don't know. We DO know he is in jail without charge. Did this happen in the Chen administration?
Was lee investigated for corruption?

ludahai said:
Actually, a lot of the approval drop WAS driven by lies and drivel from the KMT. Regardless of it being unroven allegations of corruption (some of the accusations are now known to be FALSE) to the lies about the poor economic performance of the country.
Lies are not why he is in jail

ludahai said:
No, I am consistent. I believe in innocent until proven guilty. I did NOT argue for the imprisonment of Ma while HE was under indictment and at trial. There are FIVE KMT legislators who have had their elections annulled by the courts - and all five are still holding their seats. Now, MOFA is covering up a document that indicates that two more legislators have dual citizenship, and thus are illegally holding their seats.
No you didn't, you argued that he was guilty and consistently held that he was dirty of such.
MOFA huh?
Funny how all your outrage is directed only against KMT, abian is there corrupt like no other and you're not even speaking out the least against that sack of ****?

ludahai said:
Laws written by the KMT and which do not meet international standards for human and civil rights.
Why didn't the DPP change it then between 2000 and 2004. Why didn't your father of Taiwan democracy Lee change it?

ludahai said:
I have said before that if he is found guilty in a fair trial that he SHOULD be locked up. I am merely arguing for his rights as a citizen of Taiwan. I am arguing for basic human rights. Ma's statemets that Taiwan is the freest country in the world is comical considering the recent actions of his government.
What has his administration done that is so anti human rights? You're simply feigning outrage.

ludahai said:
YOU are the one with ZERO credidility. You are the partisan hack here. I am merely arguing for the protection of his civil rights. I would do the same for a member of the KMT (and in fact, I have)
:lamo sure you have.
 
KMT Laws? Remind me again but which party exactly was in power for 8 years from 2000~2008?

Care to remind me who controlled the Legislative Yuan during those years?

Was lee investigated for corruption?

Relevance?

Lies are not why he is in jail

He was in jail due to officials in the Executive Yuan not respecting basic civil rights of the accused.

No you didn't, you argued that he was guilty and consistently held that he was dirty of such.

I believed him to be guilty, and still do believe him to be guilty of other alleged crimes, but UNLIKE you I still believe in the notion of "innocent until proven guilty." Something deep blues like you seem to think doesn't exist.

MOFA huh?

Are you going to keep playing dumb? You ARE good at it.

Funny how all your outrage is directed only against KMT, abian is there corrupt like no other and you're not even speaking out the least against that sack of ****?

If he is guilty, he belongs in jail. I have said that on numerous occasions. However, I do believe in the judicial process. He has NOT been given the civil rights that would be expected in a modern democracy.

Why didn't the DPP change it then between 2000 and 2004. Why didn't your father of Taiwan democracy Lee change it?

Who controlled the Legislative Yuan?

What has his administration done that is so anti human rights? You're simply feigning outrage.

Please explain why numerous international human rights organizations have been critical of the Ma government?

Gotta love how the day after Huam Rights Day, Ma has the Taipei police FORCIBLY remove the students from Liberty Square.
 
Care to remind me who controlled the Legislative Yuan during those years?
By all means, who controlled between 2000 and 2004, and between 2004 and 2008 what was the margin of "majority"?

ludahai said:
Relevance?
You can't ask a question that has no precedent. He may have he may not have.
All that is known is the fact that nothing about his being held in prison was unlawful - it was all proceedural.

ludahai said:
He was in jail due to officials in the Executive Yuan not respecting basic civil rights of the accused.
You just admitted that it was all proceedural and lawful and now you're accusing the executive of not respecting basic civil rights - you can't have a violation of rights when throughout the entirety of his holding everything was lawful.
Perhaps next you're going to be exclaiming that if he's to be held in prison that it's a denial of human rights?
Go cry a river - the kind of filth that sack of **** is abian doesn't deserve any rights - shoot him on the spot.

ludahai said:
I believed him to be guilty, and still do believe him to be guilty of other alleged crimes, but UNLIKE you I still believe in the notion of "innocent until proven guilty." Something deep blues like you seem to think doesn't exist.
Despite that the court ruling of there being no substance to the presecution? :lamo hyperpartisan at it's best.

ludahai said:
Are you going to keep playing dumb? You ARE good at it.
Just enjoy watching you implode.

ludahai said:
If he is guilty, he belongs in jail. I have said that on numerous occasions. However, I do believe in the judicial process. He has NOT been given the civil rights that would be expected in a modern democracy.
You believe in the judicial process and yet when that judicial ruling disagrees with you as in the case with Ma - rigged.
Abian held in custody on authority of a court judge because he would tamper with evidence if released - you do know that such practice is followed in the US and even Europe right?
It was not the executive that held Abian, it was the court.

ludahai said:
Who controlled the Legislative Yuan?
DPP in majority 2000-2004.

ludahai said:
Please explain why numerous international human rights organizations have been critical of the Ma government?
Critical? Define critical, calling for investigations is not what I'd call critical.

ludahai said:
Gotta love how the day after Huam Rights Day, Ma has the Taipei police FORCIBLY remove the students from Liberty Square.
To protest you must get approval for your route and intents, they did not file for the protest and hence removed.
BTW, was there an international observance of Human rights day?:lol:
I'll start believing your diatribe when you advocate gay marriage.
 
By all means, who controlled between 2000 and 2004, and between 2004 and 2008 what was the margin of "majority"?

The KMT-PFP alliance had a majority in the Legislative Yuan the entire time. At no time did the DPP and its allies control the Legislative Yuan. The 2001 Legislative Elections sent 115 members of the blue alliance compared to 100 greens. 115 constitued a majority.

You can't ask a question that has no precedent. He may have he may not have.

Actually, former President Lee is now under investigation by prosecutors.

All that is known is the fact that nothing about his being held in prison was unlawful - it was all proceedural.

Just because it was lawful and procedural, it doesn't mean it respects basic civil rights.

You just admitted that it was all proceedural and lawful and now you're accusing the executive of not respecting basic civil rights - you can't have a violation of rights when throughout the entirety of his holding everything was lawful.

A law that doesn't respect basic civil rights is the problem here, NOT that it was followed.

Perhaps next you're going to be exclaiming that if he's to be held in prison that it's a denial of human rights?

If he is held for five weeks incommunicado WITHOUTCHARGE, Yes, that IS a denial of human rights.

Go cry a river - the kind of filth that sack of **** is abian doesn't deserve any rights - shoot him on the spot.

Typical blue attitude. The BLUE sacks of crap don't deserve any rights. Dump them all on Green Island, without a ferry off the island.

Despite that the court ruling of there being no substance to the presecution? :lamo hyperpartisan at it's best.

And your comment above wasn't hyperpartisan?

Just enjoy watching you implode.

Oh you who continues to display nothing but hate and lack of respect for civil rights talking about someone else imploding. You apparently have no idea what MOFA is up to right now.

You believe in the judicial process and yet when that judicial ruling disagrees with you as in the case with Ma - rigged.

I am not arguing that he should be thrown in jail without a guilty verdict. You want to take away all of Chen's rights prior to a trial even being conducted.

Abian held in custody on authority of a court judge because he would tamper with evidence if released - you do know that such practice is followed in the US and even Europe right?

With charges, yes. However, he was held without charge.

It was not the executive that held Abian, it was the court.

It was the executive who called for his detention.

DPP in majority 2000-2004.

That is a baldfaced lie. See the numbers above.

To protest you must get approval for your route and intents, they did not file for the protest and hence removed.
BTW, was there an international observance of Human rights day?:lol:
I'll start believing your diatribe when you advocate gay marriage.

Ma even SPOKE on human rights day about how Taiwan has the best freedom for protestors. The day after, they were removed. As for the law, that is another KMT law that is a violation of the constititional right to protest. Funny thing is, even the KMT says the law should be changed and it has been discussed in the Legislative Yuan. Yet, the KMT removed PEACEFUL PROTESTORS. Just because something is legal doesn't mean it is respectful of human and civil rights.
 
The KMT-PFP alliance had a majority in the Legislative Yuan the entire time. At no time did the DPP and its allies control the Legislative Yuan. The 2001 Legislative Elections sent 115 members of the blue alliance compared to 100 greens. 115 constitued a majority.
There you go moving the goal post. You claimed the KMT - and of course we know how the PFP has always been on the same side as the KMT don't we?

ludahai said:
Actually, former President Lee is now under investigation by prosecutors.
He ought be, he's another corrupt politician just not as blatently obvious to everyone as abian is.

ludahai said:
Just because it was lawful and procedural, it doesn't mean it respects basic civil rights.
What rights were violated? He would be an interference with the investigation and likly to tamper with evidence, as such, proceedurly - which multiple nations have the same form of laws, he was jailed without bail.

ludahai said:
A law that doesn't respect basic civil rights is the problem here, NOT that it was followed.
Whatever, you're only bitching and whining about this because it was a DPP, I saw you cheering and joyous when Ma was indicted and tried nothing about "fair trial" or any other such bull****.

ludahai said:
If he is held for five weeks incommunicado WITHOUTCHARGE, Yes, that IS a denial of human rights.
His communicado was the tampering with evidence part.

ludahai said:
Typical blue attitude. The BLUE sacks of crap don't deserve any rights. Dump them all on Green Island, without a ferry off the island.
Sorry but I don't care much for the rights of corrupt politicians, regardless of their affiliations, they can all be shat on and die from it for all I care - want to see a poll around Taiwan as to how many people think that abian is a corrupt sack of ****? I'll give you a hint, it's far above 60%

ludahai said:
And your comment above wasn't hyperpartisan?
No, it's towards any corrupt politician - you support corruption?

ludahai said:
Oh you who continues to display nothing but hate and lack of respect for civil rights talking about someone else imploding. You apparently have no idea what MOFA is up to right now.
I reserve nothing but disgust towards corrupt political heads. Keep drinking green koolaid kiddo.

ludahai said:
I am not arguing that he should be thrown in jail without a guilty verdict. You want to take away all of Chen's rights prior to a trial even being conducted.
I'm sorry but wasn't Chen just released from jail because also of the laws?

ludahai said:
With charges, yes. However, he was held without charge.
What don't you understand? It's the fracking law; abian should've thought about law before he broke it - his whole family ought to have thought about law before they broke it.
You break the law and you're bitching about having right to freedom being denied? Cry me a river, next you're going to tell me that all prisoners ought be freed.

ludahai said:
It was the executive who called for his detention.
Why so vague? are you claiming that it was Ma who called for his detention? Is that your claim?
Please, get your head out of your arse and open your eyes and for once think for yourself rather than just drinking from Tsai's koolaid - abian is a sack of **** corrupt politician.

ludahai said:
That is a baldfaced lie. See the numbers above.
Which single party had the majority? Go on, tell us exact numbers lu, how many did the KMT have and how many did the DPP have.

ludahai said:
Ma even SPOKE on human rights day about how Taiwan has the best freedom for protestors. The day after, they were removed. As for the law, that is another KMT law that is a violation of the constititional right to protest. Funny thing is, even the KMT says the law should be changed and it has been discussed in the Legislative Yuan. Yet, the KMT removed PEACEFUL PROTESTORS. Just because something is legal doesn't mean it is respectful of human and civil rights.

Removed? How were they removed? Have people's right to congregate and protest been suspended? You are such a partisan hack job that completely mis-represents the truth.
Why were they removed lu, tell us all on what grounds did the police remove these protestors?
 
There you go moving the goal post. You claimed the KMT - and of course we know how the PFP has always been on the same side as the KMT don't we?

Ever heard of the pan-Blue alliance? They had more seats than the Greens. Most reforms that were proposed by the Greens were defeated by the Blues. The last half of President Chen's presidency even saw Blues proudly proclaiming that they were blocking proposals solely for the purpose of refusing to do anything that would make Chen look good, even to the detriment of the country.

He ought be, he's another corrupt politician just not as blatently obvious to everyone as abian is.

And of course, the Horse and the KMT are squeaky clean. :rofl:rofl

What rights were violated? He would be an interference with the investigation and likly to tamper with evidence, as such, proceedurly - which multiple nations have the same form of laws, he was jailed without bail.

And without charge. Jailing someone without bail is acceptable in certain circumstances if charges have been filed. However, bail is a right in most cases. US laws and custom require bail except in extraordinary circumstances even after charges/indictments have been filed. Here, we are talking about someone being held for FIVE WEEKS without charges/indictments.

Whatever, you're only bitching and whining about this because it was a DPP, I saw you cheering and joyous when Ma was indicted and tried nothing about "fair trial" or any other such bull****.

I DID call for a fair trial. I also did NOT call for his detention - either before or after indictments were issued. I am consistent. You are not.

His communicado was the tampering with evidence part.

What evidence was he tampering with? Are are you going to argue that defendants do not have a right to arrange their own defense.

Sorry but I don't care much for the rights of corrupt politicians, regardless of their affiliations, they can all be shat on and die from it for all I care - want to see a poll around Taiwan as to how many people think that abian is a corrupt sack of ****? I'll give you a hint, it's far above 60%

The polls are largely a function of the disinformation that the blue media and idiots like Chiu Yi, among others, have spewed for the past four years. If he is found guilty by a competant court in a fair trial, he should be thrown in jail. However, until then, he has the right to a fair trial, to his civil rights being protected, and the legal presumption of innocence.

No, it's towards any corrupt politician - you support corruption?

No, I don't. Then again, you support the most corrupt political party in the history of Taiwan with as many as (perhaps even more) than SEVEN legislators still currently illegally holding their seats in the Legislative Yuan under the protection of the KMT majority.

I reserve nothing but disgust towards corrupt political heads. Keep drinking green koolaid kiddo.

Unless they are Blue.

I'm sorry but wasn't Chen just released from jail because also of the laws?

After five weeks in prison without charge.

What don't you understand? It's the fracking law; abian should've thought about law before he broke it - his whole family ought to have thought about law before they broke it.

I understand clearly. What don't YOU understand about those laws NOT meeting general expectations of the protection of human and civil rights in a 21st century democracy.

You break the law and you're bitching about having right to freedom being denied? Cry me a river, next you're going to tell me that all prisoners ought be freed.

ALLEGEDLY broke a law. Has he been convicted yet? How about the numerous KMT Legislators who have neen convicted! Including at least one who was convicted of a VIOLENT CRIME who put people's PHYSICAL SAFETY at risk.

Why so vague? are you claiming that it was Ma who called for his detention? Is that your claim?

The prosecutors work for the Executive Yuan. They called for his detention without charge. Then the prosecutors worked for PResident Chen, did they make similar calls for Ma to be detained without charge?

Please, get your head out of your arse and open your eyes and for once think for yourself rather than just drinking from Tsai's koolaid - abian is a sack of **** corrupt politician.

Perhaps he is. However, he still has the same rights to a fair trial as anyone else?

Which single party had the majority? Go on, tell us exact numbers lu, how many did the KMT have and how many did the DPP have.

No single party had a majority. The Pan-Blue COALITION had a majority. Your claims that the DPP had a majority is a lie.

DPP had 87 seats, the Taiwan Solidarity Union had 13 seats for a total of 100 seats.
KMT had 68 seats, the PFP had 46 seats, the New Party had 1 for a total of 115 seats.
10 seats went to neutral parties/independents.

The last I checked, 115 out of 225 seats constitutes a majority, one held by the KMT and their PFP allies. Care to lie about this or more the bar again?


Removed? How were they removed? Have people's right to congregate and protest been suspended? You are such a partisan hack job that completely mis-represents the truth.

The protestors were FORCIBLY removed by police at 5 AM in the morning. The students were taken to NTU while the Tibetan protestors were taken and dropped off in the hills of Neihu (roughly Taipei's equivalent to the middle of nowhere.) You are the partisan hack job with no notion of basic human and political rights.

Why were they removed lu, tell us all on what grounds did the police remove these protestors?

They were removed because they were preaching a message that the city government of Taipei could no longer tolerate. They were peaceful, UNLIKE YOUR BLUE THUGS FOUR YEARS AGO! I love someone who supports a political party whose thugs formented the most violent demostrations in the history of democratic Taiwan, yet supports the forces removal of students peacefully protesting at Liberty Square.
 
Ever heard of the pan-Blue alliance? They had more seats than the Greens. Most reforms that were proposed by the Greens were defeated by the Blues. The last half of President Chen's presidency even saw Blues proudly proclaiming that they were blocking proposals solely for the purpose of refusing to do anything that would make Chen look good, even to the detriment of the country.
I don't care lu, answer the question, which party not pan, but party controlled the most number of seats between 2000 and 2008.

ludahai said:
And of course, the Horse and the KMT are squeaky clean.
The horse is squeaky clean - the KMT is not. How's Abian? DPP?

ludahai said:
And without charge. Jailing someone without bail is acceptable in certain circumstances if charges have been filed. However, bail is a right in most cases. US laws and custom require bail except in extraordinary circumstances even after charges/indictments have been filed. Here, we are talking about someone being held for FIVE WEEKS without charges/indictments.
No, not true at all, should the suspect be suspect of tampering with evidence or be suspect of inpedeing with the investigation the suspect can be held without bail under custody for a fixed duration - that is exactly what happend in this case.

ludahai said:
I DID call for a fair trial. I also did NOT call for his detention - either before or after indictments were issued. I am consistent. You are not.
And of course, the trail was unfair because it disagreed with your allegations.
Where was your call of fair trial here? Never saw it.

ludahai said:
What evidence was he tampering with? Are are you going to argue that defendants do not have a right to arrange their own defense.
A phone call to his wife or son so as to make their stories the same. As I've said, this is common practice in all civilized societies

ludahai said:
The polls are largely a function of the disinformation that the blue media and idiots like Chiu Yi, among others, have spewed for the past four years. If he is found guilty by a competant court in a fair trial, he should be thrown in jail. However, until then, he has the right to a fair trial, to his civil rights being protected, and the legal presumption of innocence.
Disinformation does not lead to a 92% disapproval lu - disinformation does not lead to indictments, disinformation does not lead to international authorities presenting evidence of money laundering.
See the first thing you're going to be screaming here when he's found guilty by the court is that the courts were corrupt and in the pocket of the KMT and scream violation of human rights - hyper partisan rhetoric.

ludahai said:
No, I don't. Then again, you support the most corrupt political party in the history of Taiwan with as many as (perhaps even more) than SEVEN legislators still currently illegally holding their seats in the Legislative Yuan under the protection of the KMT majority.
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.

ludahai said:
Unless they are Blue.
:lamo, is that why I call Ma an ass kissing *****? Is that why I called Chiang Kai Shrek an indignant totalitarian dictating ****tard?
You've no clue what you're talking about and are simply grasping at strings lu. You've been bitter since March by the total defeat of your beloved dpp - it's the exact same rhetoric that you're preaching on this site as what the DPP bbs bulliten is posting all over. So go on, keep drinking the coolaid - such sentiments are completely irrelevant.

ludahai said:
After five weeks in prison without charge.
It's a tragedy he wasn't longer - the sack of **** deserves nothing but to rot in jail. I thought you conservatives were all about tough on crime and corrupt politicians, seems it's only applicable when it's not one of your own.

ludahai said:
I understand clearly. What don't YOU understand about those laws NOT meeting general expectations of the protection of human and civil rights in a 21st century democracy.
I guess you didn't get the memo explaining how prisoner freedoms are suspended.

ludahai said:
ALLEGEDLY broke a law. Has he been convicted yet?
Will you ever accept a guilty verdict? No, I know that you know that, you will never accept a guilty verdict and begin a long regurgitation of blown up charges of investigative irregularities and court irregularities.

ludahai said:
How about the numerous KMT Legislators who have neen convicted! Including at least one who was convicted of a VIOLENT CRIME who put people's PHYSICAL SAFETY at risk.
Oh yeah, there we go again with that non-sense. Yeah, we've clearly seen how you address that, it's only such when KMT does it, when DPP does it - Police brutality!!! Police state!!! Suspension of human rights!!!! Call for an international independent inquiry!!!!
You said you were going to address those video clips I posted, predictably how you've not addressed a single section.

ludahai said:
The prosecutors work for the Executive Yuan. They called for his detention without charge. Then the prosecutors worked for PResident Chen, did they make similar calls for Ma to be detained without charge?
:lamo Ma's family was never involved with Ma's case; the same is not so with abian, his entire family was involved - minus his daughter.

ludahai said:
Perhaps he is. However, he still has the same rights to a fair trial as anyone else?
What does fair trial have anything to do with my calling him a sack of ****?

ludahai said:
No single party had a majority. The Pan-Blue COALITION had a majority. Your claims that the DPP had a majority is a lie.

DPP had 87 seats, the Taiwan Solidarity Union had 13 seats for a total of 100 seats.
KMT had 68 seats, the PFP had 46 seats, the New Party had 1 for a total of 115 seats.
10 seats went to neutral parties/independents.
87 seats, that seems a lot more than 68 lu.

ludahai said:
The last I checked, 115 out of 225 seats constitutes a majority, one held by the KMT and their PFP allies. Care to lie about this or more the bar again?
Except you fail to honestly present that the PFP was politically against the KMT as was the new party, there was no pan blue "coalition" until 2003.
However the DPP and TSU were solidly aligned on virtually every issue.

ludahai said:
The protestors were FORCIBLY removed by police at 5 AM in the morning. The students were taken to NTU while the Tibetan protestors were taken and dropped off in the hills of Neihu (roughly Taipei's equivalent to the middle of nowhere.) You are the partisan hack job with no notion of basic human and political rights.

They were removed because they were preaching a message that the city government of Taipei could no longer tolerate. They were peaceful, UNLIKE YOUR BLUE THUGS FOUR YEARS AGO! I love someone who supports a political party whose thugs formented the most violent demostrations in the history of democratic Taiwan, yet supports the forces removal of students peacefully protesting at Liberty Square.
Wrong lu, the were removed because they were in violation of the guidlines of filing for protest.
Such guidelines exist in all democracies around the world including the US and even vary from state to state, municipality to municipality - go look it up yourself on the US Government accountability office.
U.S. GAO - Bid Protests at GAO: A Descriptive Guide
So quite your whining and bitching about how OMFG this is so anti human rights, this is such a infringement on rights.
They protestors knew the consequences of not filing and were there to challenge and were thus put on a bus and dropped off elsewhere. Were there any charges? No, was anyone beat up? no, police brutality? no.
Feigning outrage from the pan green hyperpartisans so as to de-legitimize the government? Yes, that's all this is.
 
I don't care lu, answer the question, which party not pan, but party controlled the most number of seats between 2000 and 2008.

Yet, there was NOT enough to effect any changes because there were a MAJORITY of seats held by parties that opposed the DPP. You claimed they could have effectuated action, but they did not have a majority of seats, as you WRONGLY claimed they had. You are the one who lied here, and are now trying to cover it by moving the goalposts.

The horse is squeaky clean - the KMT is not. How's Abian? DPP?
Didn't say Chen was sqeaky clean. I am merely calling for a respect of his civil rights and right to a fair trial in a transparent manner. Ma is NOT squeaky clean, else he would not have been indicted last year. There are other investigations on hold, waiting for his term to end in 2012.

No, not true at all, should the suspect be suspect of tampering with evidence or be suspect of inpedeing with the investigation the suspect can be held without bail under custody for a fixed duration - that is exactly what happend in this case.
In Taiwan, this is true. Can you find any other modern democracies where someone can be so held without charge?

And of course, the trail was unfair because it disagreed with your allegations.
Where was your call of fair trial here? Never saw it.
There was a trial, he was found not guilty. I accept that. I have NOT called for his imprisonment, either pre- during, or post-trial. Will YOU accept any not-guilty verdicts if they happen to be rendered in even a single CHen case? I would be shocked if you did. Even KMT legislators can't accept the judges decision to release Chen according to the law and are now even filing to impeach the judge. Gotta love the KMT's respect for the rule of law. A judge makes a decision they don't like, move to impeach him. One more step down the slippery slope of Blue Terror.

A phone call to his wife or son so as to make their stories the same. As I've said, this is common practice in all civilized societies
So, defendants don't have a right to organize their defense? It is up to the prosecutor to prove his guilt. Have it your way, no defendant anywhere in the world will have a chance to prepare their own defense.

Disinformation does not lead to a 92% disapproval lu - disinformation does not lead to indictments, disinformation does not lead to international authorities presenting evidence of money laundering.
ANd if he is found guilty, he should be thrown in jail. I have neversaid otherwise. However, it is equally clear that the trial by media played by the prosecutor, the lies by the ilk of Chiu Yi for years, and the lies by the media regarding the alleged poor performance of Taiwan's economy all have turned people against PResident Chen. Actually, more and more people (still a signiificant minority) are seeing the problems of what is happening with Tyrant-in-training Ma. That you support that piece of horse dung says more about you than it does about me.

See the first thing you're going to be screaming here when he's found guilty by the court is that the courts were corrupt and in the pocket of the KMT and scream violation of human rights - hyper partisan rhetoric.
Take a look at the procedings, and see what happens.

Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
:rofl Failure to acknowledge that there are FIVE KMT legislators who have had their elections annulled by the courts and are still in their seats, and at least TWO legislators possibly have US citizenship according to a document being covered up by MOFA, which is a violation of the nationality law.

:lamo, is that why I call Ma an ass kissing *****? Is that why I called Chiang Kai Shrek an indignant totalitarian dictating ****tard?
But you praise the younger Chiang as the Father of Democracy in Taiwan, which is a piece of utter excrement.

You've no clue what you're talking about and are simply grasping at strings lu. You've been bitter since March by the total defeat of your beloved dpp - it's the exact same rhetoric that you're preaching on this site as what the DPP bbs bulliten is posting all over. So go on, keep drinking the coolaid - such sentiments are completely irrelevant.
You are the one drinking kool-aid, so blind to what is happening that numerous international human rights organizations have expressed their concerns, people held in jail against modern conceptions of human rights, peaceful protestors forcibly removed TWICE, legislators illegally holding their seats under the protection of the KMT majority, etc. You need to take off those blue blinders through which you view the world.

It's a tragedy he wasn't longer - the sack of **** deserves nothing but to rot in jail. I thought you conservatives were all about tough on crime and corrupt politicians, seems it's only applicable when it's not one of your own.
Has be been found guilty yet?

I guess you didn't get the memo explaining how prisoner freedoms are suspended.
I guess you didn't get the memo that Chen hasn't been convicted of anything yet.

Will you ever accept a guilty verdict? No, I know that you know that, you will never accept a guilty verdict and begin a long regurgitation of blown up charges of investigative irregularities and court irregularities.
I will if the trial is fair, and transparant.

Oh yeah, there we go again with that non-sense. Yeah, we've clearly seen how you address that, it's only such when KMT does it, when DPP does it - Police brutality!!! Police state!!! Suspension of human rights!!!! Call for an international independent inquiry!!!!
There SHOULD be an independent inquiry, just like KMT called for an independent inquiry into the shooting of Chen four years ago. The funny thing is when Henry Lee came and presented his report, the KMT and their fradulant allies either dismissed or misrepresnted his findings.

You said you were going to address those video clips I posted, predictably how you've not addressed a single section.
I have. ANyone can take video clips out of context.

:lamo Ma's family was never involved with Ma's case; the same is not so with abian, his entire family was involved - minus his daughter.
Allegedly.

What does fair trial have anything to do with my calling him a sack of ****?
Your contempt for his rights is indicative of your feelings of his right to have his civil rights respected through this process.

87 seats, that seems a lot more than 68 lu.
But far short of a majority.

Except you fail to honestly present that the PFP was politically against the KMT as was the new party, there was no pan blue "coalition" until 2003.
But both were opposed to the DPP/TSU on nearly every issue.

However the DPP and TSU were solidly aligned on virtually every issue.
But with 100 seats combined, it still fell short of a majority.

Wrong lu, the were removed because they were in violation of the guidlines of filing for protest.
Guidelines which allow the police to determine who can protest and who can not, something even the KMT caucus gives LIP SERVICE to being a violation of the right to protest. Funny that Ma makes comments about the freedom of protest in Taiwan on HUman Rights Day and just a few hours later, the protesters are forcibly removed. How legal were the protests held by your beloved KMT four years ago? Who do you continue to ignore this point? ASHAMED!?!?!

Such guidelines exist in all democracies around the world including the US and even vary from state to state, municipality to municipality - go look it up yourself on the US Government accountability office.
U.S. GAO - Bid Protests at GAO: A Descriptive Guide
What a fricking joke. That page has to do with protesting a the awarding/request for a government bid, not public protests. You love to misrepresent and lie, don't you. You are SO good at it.

So quite your whining and bitching about how OMFG this is so anti human rights, this is such a infringement on rights.
Care to read your own links before you paste them on here?

They protestors knew the consequences of not filing and were there to challenge and were thus put on a bus and dropped off elsewhere. Were there any charges? No, was anyone beat up? no, police brutality? no.
Feigning outrage from the pan green hyperpartisans so as to de-legitimize the government? Yes, that's all this is.
This government bites hard core. They are not responsive to the people. Ma has lied so many times the past nine months, it isn't funny anymore. The government has been so bloody incompetant. They can't even handle economic stimulus packages without wasting resources in the process. They can't even handle the creation of a four-day weekend without completely screwing it up. Utter incompetance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yet, there was NOT enough to effect any changes because there were a MAJORITY of seats held by parties that opposed the DPP. You claimed they could have effectuated action, but they did not have a majority of seats, as you WRONGLY claimed they had. You are the one who lied here, and are now trying to cover it by moving the goalposts.
What's 200-68? If the laws were so against human rights as you so claim, all the parties would've agreed to it even without 68 votes.

ludahai said:
Didn't say Chen was sqeaky clean. I am merely calling for a respect of his civil rights and right to a fair trial in a transparent manner. Ma is NOT squeaky clean, else he would not have been indicted last year. There are other investigations on hold, waiting for his term to end in 2012.
:lamo way to move the goal posts.

ludahai said:
In Taiwan, this is true. Can you find any other modern democracies where someone can be so held without charge?
US, UK, France, Germany want to go on?

ludahai said:
There was a trial, he was found not guilty. I accept that. I have NOT called for his imprisonment, either pre- during, or post-trial. Will YOU accept any not-guilty verdicts if they happen to be rendered in even a single CHen case?
Yes

ludahai said:
I would be shocked if you did.
Shocked yet?

ludahai said:
Even KMT legislators can't accept the judges decision to release Chen according to the law and are now even filing to impeach the judge.
Did you read the ruling by the judge? Abian is too big of a political figure that everyone knows that he does not pose a flight risk? Can you explain as to how that is justifiable? Legislating from the bench?

ludahai said:
Gotta love the KMT's respect for the rule of law. A judge makes a decision they don't like, move to impeach him. One more step down the slippery slope of Blue Terror.
Blue terror would be if they just shot him and thus effectively removing him. Have there become of any impeachment hearings?

ludahai said:
So, defendants don't have a right to organize their defense? It is up to the prosecutor to prove his guilt. Have it your way, no defendant anywhere in the world will have a chance to prepare their own defense.
They do, just not to impede with investigations or to tamper with evidence.

ludahai said:
ANd if he is found guilty, he should be thrown in jail. I have neversaid otherwise. However, it is equally clear that the trial by media played by the prosecutor, the lies by the ilk of Chiu Yi for years, and the lies by the media regarding the alleged poor performance of Taiwan's economy all have turned people against PResident Chen. Actually, more and more people (still a signiificant minority) are seeing the problems of what is happening with Tyrant-in-training Ma. That you support that piece of horse dung says more about you than it does about me.
Yeah yeah yeah, you greens just go on with your pathetic antics and pull off his wig.

ludahai said:
Take a look at the procedings, and see what happens.
As I said, already setting your own step off.

ludahai said:
Failure to acknowledge that there are FIVE KMT legislators who have had their elections annulled by the courts and are still in their seats, and at least TWO legislators possibly have US citizenship according to a document being covered up by MOFA, which is a violation of the nationality law.
Un huh, Sakura card by DPP member that's fine, he's a victim of white terror; possible citizenship FOUL FOUL FOUL!

ludahai said:
But you praise the younger Chiang as the Father of Democracy in Taiwan, which is a piece of utter excrement.
He is, I challenge you to go around asking and find much negativity against Chiang Chingkuo, if there was no Chingkuo, there would've never been a Taiwan of today.

ludahai said:
You are the one drinking kool-aid, so blind to what is happening that numerous international human rights organizations have expressed their concerns, people held in jail against modern conceptions of human rights, peaceful protestors forcibly removed TWICE, legislators illegally holding their seats under the protection of the KMT majority, etc. You need to take off those blue blinders through which you view the world.
Copying again huh? Peaceful or not, anyone in violation of the law and knowingly doing so faces consequences.
Human rights violations? what violations?
KMT legislators holding seats illegally according to whom?

ludahai said:
Has be been found guilty yet?
Want to wager on this?

ludahai said:
I guess you didn't get the memo that Chen hasn't been convicted of anything yet.
$50 sound good to you?

ludahai said:
I will if the trial is fair, and transparant.
:roll: We both know what you'll be doing, screaming "unfair" just as you did with Ma's innocent verdict all 3 times.

ludahai said:
There SHOULD be an independent inquiry, just like KMT called for an independent inquiry into the shooting of Chen four years ago.
So a president getting shot should not be investigated??

ludahai said:
The funny thing is when Henry Lee came and presented his report, the KMT and their fradulant allies either dismissed or misrepresnted his findings.
By all means lu, how about posting what those findings were:lol:

ludahai said:
I have. ANyone can take video clips out of context.
Clear lie, you never addressed the video's other than calling them as biased. I didn't do anything other than post the video clips without anything other than a commentary of exactly what was going on, I challenge you to demonstrate anywhere where anything I said of the clips was anything even vaguely dishonest.

ludahai said:
Allegedly.
Tell that to interpole

Multiplet Report p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
ludahai said:
]Your contempt for his rights is indicative of your feelings of his right to have his civil rights respected through this process.
I have no respect for corrupt politicians.

ludahai said:
But far short of a majority.
Nevertheless the most dominant party.

ludahai said:
But both were opposed to the DPP/TSU on nearly every issue.
Did the DPP/TSU ever raise any voice on changing such laws ever?

ludahai said:
But with 100 seats combined, it still fell short of a majority.
doesn't matter PFP didn't vote with the KMT all the time.

ludahai said:
Guidelines which allow the police to determine who can protest and who can not
Based on what guidlines? Political ideology? would you like to review the NYC guidlines for protesting?

ludahai said:
something even the KMT caucus gives LIP SERVICE to being a violation of the right to protest. Funny that Ma makes comments about the freedom of protest in Taiwan on HUman Rights Day and just a few hours later, the protesters are forcibly removed. How legal were the protests held by your beloved KMT four years ago?
There you go again, they were perfectly legal and actually far less violent than what your thugs did last month.

ludahai said:
Who do you continue to ignore this point? ASHAMED!?!?!
I've ignored? Yeah I got to address you every time you bring up 4 years ago when abian staged his own assassination attempt?

ludahai said:
What a fricking joke. That page has to do with protesting a the awarding/request for a government bid, not public protests. You love to misrepresent and lie, don't you. You are SO good at it.
NYC has no guidelines? Really? SF? LA? London? Paris? Tokyo? Every metropolitan area has guidelines for protests. Taipei is no different.

ludahai said:
Care to read your own links before you paste them on here?
Keep on crying

ludahai said:
This government bites hard core. They are not responsive to the people.
To take a page out of conservative philosophy, you don't like it? Feel free to leave.

ludahai said:
Ma has lied so many times the past nine months, it isn't funny anymore. The government has been so bloody incompetant. They can't even handle economic stimulus packages without wasting resources in the process. They can't even handle the creation of a four-day weekend without completely screwing it up. Utter incompetance.
Which government in the world today is dealing with the economic downfall well?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's 200-68? If the laws were so against human rights as you so claim, all the parties would've agreed to it even without 68 votes.

What the heck are you talking about? 200-68???

:lamo way to move the goal posts.

:rofl You, the master of moving goal posts? LOL Please explain how I have moved them?

US, UK, France, Germany want to go on?

Care to back that up with a credible link? In Florida in the US, you can't be held more than 72 hours without charge. In the UK, it is 36 hours (except for terrorism related charges, and even then, it is only seven days).

Yes

Shocked yet?

Saying it as a hypothetical is one thing; accepting it as a reality is one completely different.

Did you read the ruling by the judge? Abian is too big of a political figure that everyone knows that he does not pose a flight risk? Can you explain as to how that is justifiable? Legislating from the bench?

Chen poses a flight risk? If so, why didn't he leave in the six months between the end of his term and the time he was incarcerated. Five weeks without charge. Violation of human and civil rights.

Blue terror would be if they just shot him and thus effectively removing him. Have there become of any impeachment hearings?

I said this was a slippery slope that the people of Taiwan will have to be vigilent to prevent from becomming reality. As for the hearings, there haven't been any year. It has just been filed.

They do, just not to impede with investigations or to tamper with evidence.

How has Chen tampered with evidence?

Yeah yeah yeah, you greens just go on with your pathetic antics and pull off his wig.

That was pretty funny, actually. Not nearly as bad as Chiu getting on a blue truck ramming a police line four years go.

As I said, already setting your own step off.

What, if the procedings ARE unfair and lack transparency, are you saying that everyone should accept it because everyone knows he is guilty and thus does not deserve a fair trial?

Un huh, Sakura card by DPP member that's fine, he's a victim of white terror; possible citizenship FOUL FOUL FOUL!

Holding Sakura card= Not a violation of the Nationality Law
Holding foreign citizenship=Violation of the Natioality Law

What part of that can't you understand.

He is, I challenge you to go around asking and find much negativity against Chiang Chingkuo, if there was no Chingkuo, there would've never been a Taiwan of today.

There are a LOT of people who don't like him. Remember the Kaohsiung Incident?

Copying again huh? Peaceful or not, anyone in violation of the law and knowingly doing so faces consequences.

Even if the law is unjust; one that even the President and leaders in the LY have spoken against?

KMT legislators holding seats illegally according to whom?

The courts!

Want to wager on this?

$50 sound good to you?

Obviously your reading comprehension abilities need some work.

We both know what you'll be doing, screaming "unfair" just as you did with Ma's innocent verdict all 3 times.

But have I said Ma should go to jail in the absense of a guilty verdict?

So a president getting shot should not be investigated??

Yes, and it was. The KMT just didn't accept the results.

By all means lu, how about posting what those findings were:lol:

Just check Wikipedia. There were two bullets. One passed through the windshield. That is obvious to ANYONE.

Tell that to interpole

Did Interpol declare anyone guilty of anything?

Multiplet Report p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; } I have no respect for corrupt politicians.

Nor do I. If he is guilty, throw the book at him. Funny how you criticize some corrupt politicians, yet you leave others alone.

Nevertheless the most dominant party.

But without the votes to make any substantive changes.

Did the DPP/TSU ever raise any voice on changing such laws ever?

Yes, they did, but they were drowned out.

doesn't matter PFP didn't vote with the KMT all the time.

Care to find one instance where the PFP voted WITH the DPP/KMT on changing substantial procedural laws in the country regarding civil and human rights?

Based on what guidlines? Political ideology? would you like to review the NYC guidlines for protesting?

Got busted on your last link? Care to provide another one?

There you go again, they were perfectly legal and actually far less violent than what your thugs did last month.

:rofl:rofl What a joke. Of course, trying to break through a police line in Kaohsiung was peaceful. The invasion and trashing of the Central Election Commission was peaceful. The beating up of people speaking up against their protests was peaceful. The reign of terror in downtown Taipei for weeks was peaceful. Yeah, right!

I've ignored? Yeah I got to address you every time you bring up 4 years ago when abian staged his own assassination attempt?

You want to sit there and have someone shoot TWO bullets at you? CHen dared Lien to. Lien (smartly) declined.

NYC has no guidelines? Really? SF? LA? London? Paris? Tokyo? Every metropolitan area has guidelines for protests. Taipei is no different.

Care to explain what they are?

Keep on crying

Nice response when you get busted for posting a link that has NO RELATION to what you were claiming.

To take a page out of conservative philosophy, you don't like it? Feel free to leave.

Which government in the world today is dealing with the economic downfall well?

Since when have I ever endorsed such ideas in the US? Like creating strawmen? You are the master of it.
 
What the heck are you talking about? 200-68???



:rofl You, the master of moving goal posts? LOL Please explain how I have moved them?



Care to back that up with a credible link? In Florida in the US, you can't be held more than 72 hours without charge. In the UK, it is 36 hours (except for terrorism related charges, and even then, it is only seven days).



Saying it as a hypothetical is one thing; accepting it as a reality is one completely different.



Chen poses a flight risk? If so, why didn't he leave in the six months between the end of his term and the time he was incarcerated. Five weeks without charge. Violation of human and civil rights.



I said this was a slippery slope that the people of Taiwan will have to be vigilent to prevent from becomming reality. As for the hearings, there haven't been any year. It has just been filed.



How has Chen tampered with evidence?



That was pretty funny, actually. Not nearly as bad as Chiu getting on a blue truck ramming a police line four years go.



What, if the procedings ARE unfair and lack transparency, are you saying that everyone should accept it because everyone knows he is guilty and thus does not deserve a fair trial?



Holding Sakura card= Not a violation of the Nationality Law
Holding foreign citizenship=Violation of the Natioality Law

What part of that can't you understand.



There are a LOT of people who don't like him. Remember the Kaohsiung Incident?



Even if the law is unjust; one that even the President and leaders in the LY have spoken against?



The courts!



Obviously your reading comprehension abilities need some work.



But have I said Ma should go to jail in the absense of a guilty verdict?



Yes, and it was. The KMT just didn't accept the results.



Just check Wikipedia. There were two bullets. One passed through the windshield. That is obvious to ANYONE.



Did Interpol declare anyone guilty of anything?



Nor do I. If he is guilty, throw the book at him. Funny how you criticize some corrupt politicians, yet you leave others alone.



But without the votes to make any substantive changes.



Yes, they did, but they were drowned out.



Care to find one instance where the PFP voted WITH the DPP/KMT on changing substantial procedural laws in the country regarding civil and human rights?



Got busted on your last link? Care to provide another one?



:rofl:rofl What a joke. Of course, trying to break through a police line in Kaohsiung was peaceful. The invasion and trashing of the Central Election Commission was peaceful. The beating up of people speaking up against their protests was peaceful. The reign of terror in downtown Taipei for weeks was peaceful. Yeah, right!



You want to sit there and have someone shoot TWO bullets at you? CHen dared Lien to. Lien (smartly) declined.



Care to explain what they are?



Nice response when you get busted for posting a link that has NO RELATION to what you were claiming.



Since when have I ever endorsed such ideas in the US? Like creating strawmen? You are the master of it.

I bore of your typical he said she said. Have fun with your final word - let me know when you can actually be honest without the hyperpartisan koolaid.
 
I bore of your typical he said she said. Have fun with your final word - let me know when you can actually be honest without the hyperpartisan koolaid.

I love it. I beat him on every point, point out his lies and mistatements, then he cuts and runs. Typical pan Blue coward.
 
Now, Reporters without Borders is complaining about the sitution of the press under our dictator-in-training, Ma Yingjiu.

article here

Of course, our resident-KMT apologist will either ignore this or find some way to brush off the increasing international condemnation of the Ma regime.
 
Back
Top Bottom