The word consent is used to distinguish the idea of doing something to someone against their will. Consent-rule doesn't apply with inanimate objects in really any law.
It doesn't matter.How can an inanimate object give consent?
You miss the point, or are intentionally dodging it.
You have decided that the CITIZEN can't marry the bar stool because it can't consent. That is YOUR judgment. Your decision. You would take away that person's right to freely do what he wants and receive the same benefits as any other married person.
That is the same as the majority have done in CA.
That is the reason government involvement in marriage needed to be abolished and not expanded.
you will learn that when the leftest here cannot support their arguments and attempt to shift the subject or just make specious arguments and you call them on it they engage in the childish "shuffle" game. Got to where they would not even try to discuss an issue, just try to shut it down with this nonsense. That's why I no longer participate here and rather found a forum where there is adult discourse. I check in every once and a while and to my amusment I am stil the stuff of legend or rather myth.
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." Marcus Aurelius
Proud member of the Gang of Five, the gang that is always right!
No Personal Attacks, if you can't debate the issue go elsewhere.
Martyrdom is so tired.
If you're going to go, then just go. We don't care. kthx.