• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Navy destroyer opens fire after ‘harassing’ behavior by Iranian patrol boats [W:130]

Re: Navy destroyer opens fire after ‘harassing’ behavior by Iranian patrol boats [W:1

Okay, so Iran wasn't during the Bush administration?

Are you sure?

I'm smelling some sort of a trap that you want to spring on me.

Before the Obama Iran deal, with UN economic sanctions in place, trade limitation as to what could be shipped in and out, and their oil wasn't on the outbound, at least not legally at open market prices (black market is another story, and at cut rate prices), and their economy was strangled, and yes, they were an international pariah. Not nearly as much as North Korea, but not by much.

After the deal, with an influx of cash from Obama, all the western corporations are over there competing for their business, Boeing for one, and probably many others. Flush with cash they are talking to the Russians about weapons deals. They are arming up. Saudi's as well in response, hell, they've got all the oil money. The rest of the ME is going to in response as well. Before long, there'll be a nice shooting war going on between them that'll make Syria look like a kiddie party. Won't Obama be proud.
 
Re: Navy destroyer opens fire after ‘harassing’ behavior by Iranian patrol boats

Derp... I said they were both speculation and suggested with the caveat you set the bar for what's acceptable evidence. Did you lose your train of thought?


feel free to read back and see. Both are speculation. you are just being a hypocritical true believer.

Fact: Anna Politkovskaya was a vocal and vehement critic of Putin's regime.

Fact: She had repeatedly been warned that her life was in danger.

Fact: She was found shot dead in the elevator of her apartment block.

Fact: The killing occurred on Putin's birthday

Fact: The killing was judged to be a contract killing.

Fact: Putin was a high ranking member of the KGB before the fall of the USSR.

Fact: the Russian underworld has a number of former KGB agents involved in criminal activity in important positions .

Fact: Former pro Russian Chechen commander Movladi Baisarov was shot dead in November 2006 while he was in town to testify about connections to kidnapping and murder, as well as about the death of Politkovskaya.

Hm.....and that's just one example.
 
Re: Navy destroyer opens fire after ‘harassing’ behavior by Iranian patrol boats

Fact: Anna Politkovskaya was a vocal and vehement critic of Putin's regime.

Fact: She had repeatedly been warned that her life was in danger.

Fact: She was found shot dead in the elevator of her apartment block.

Fact: The killing occurred on Putin's birthday

Fact: The killing was judged to be a contract killing.

Fact: Putin was a high ranking member of the KGB before the fall of the USSR.

Fact: the Russian underworld has a number of former KGB agents involved in criminal activity in important positions .

Fact: Former pro Russian Chechen commander Movladi Baisarov was shot dead in November 2006 while he was in town to testify about connections to kidnapping and murder, as well as about the death of Politkovskaya.

Hm.....and that's just one example.





well that proves it... it happened on putin's birthday!


You should work for the CIA!
 
Re: Navy destroyer opens fire after ‘harassing’ behavior by Iranian patrol boats

well that proves it... it happened on putin's birthday!


You should work for the CIA!

I really do hate to break it to you, but that's not exactly likely to be a coindence. You yourself admitted that the Kremlin "probably" did it. Now you are backtracking, but that doesn't change the fact that you admitted it in the first place.
 
Re: Navy destroyer opens fire after ‘harassing’ behavior by Iranian patrol boats

I really do hate to break it to you, but that's not exactly likely to be a coindence. You yourself admitted that the Kremlin "probably" did it. Now you are backtracking, but that doesn't change the fact that you admitted it in the first place.


No I am mocking your "Evidence", and suggested you go work for the CIA as they said evidence of russian hacking was "they celebrated", you'd fit right in with that nonsense.
 
Re: Navy destroyer opens fire after ‘harassing’ behavior by Iranian patrol boats

No I am mocking your "Evidence", and suggested you go work for the CIA as they said evidence of russian hacking was "they celebrated", you'd fit right in with that nonsense.

No, you are wildly backtracking because you don't want to admit the truth.

But I'm glad to see that at least one libertarian fits well into the stereotype.
 
Re: Navy destroyer opens fire after ‘harassing’ behavior by Iranian patrol boats

No, you are wildly backtracking because you don't want to admit the truth.

But I'm glad to see that at least one libertarian fits well into the stereotype.



Don't pout.


In this battle, you were never the navy destroyer. ;)
 
Re: Navy destroyer opens fire after ‘harassing’ behavior by Iranian patrol boats

Don't pout.


In this battle, you were never the navy destroyer. ;)

And you were never anywhere near the battlefield. At the best, you were Mussolini's Italians---full of pompous bluster yet unable to back it up.
 
Back
Top Bottom