• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump battles Meryl Streep with tweets as Cabinet picks prepare for grilling

He imitated the reporter. That is not in question. We have video evidence of exactly that.

My, you seem to be able to ignore presented facts convincingly. He exhibited the same mannerisms to two other people.

She deserves the same freedom of speech that you or i enjoy.
Sure she does, she also has consequences. My point is she is cheapening her lifetime award and her achievements and her happiness by dwelling on something she doesn't have the stones to do something about except with a captive audience.

Your opinion is irrelevant. We would not be having this conversation if "no one" cared.

What I mean by that is her opinion doesn't have relevance. The manner in which she revealed it did. Her opinion is really no better than anyone else's and in many ways, worse.



Again, that's just your silly opinion. I bet you were perfectly happy to watch Clint Eastwood dishonestly accuse an imaginary President Obama of swearing. I was happy to criticize that performance and you are free to criticize her speech, but your insistence that she should be prohibited from doing so goes much too far to be taken seriously.

Sigh, I didn't say she should be prohibited, quit tossing up a straw man so easily. I said that if she truly wants to make an impact she can do so in the political arena, but we both know she won't do that.

Work on your arguments and reading what I type, not what you want to think I typed.
 
Trump battles Meryl Streep with tweets as Cabinet picks prepare for grilling | The Seattle Times


Someone please take hiw Twitter away.

His vindictiveness is that of a 9 year old. Neener, neener, neener. Act like a President for crying out loud. What is going to happen when other countries call him out?


People still don't get it I see. Trump for the first time takes on the progressive left head on, unlike GOP before him. THIS is what we've all wanted al along. The GOP up until Trump played by a certain set of etiquette rules, well, no longer, he'll call them out every single time for their lunacy and false characterizations.

The lefts days of bullying normal people are numbered.

Tim-
 
My, you seem to be able to ignore presented facts convincingly. He exhibited the same mannerisms to two other people.


Sure she does, she also has consequences. My point is she is cheapening her lifetime award and her achievements and her happiness by dwelling on something she doesn't have the stones to do something about except with a captive audience.



What I mean by that is her opinion doesn't have relevance. The manner in which she revealed it did. Her opinion is really no better than anyone else's and in many ways, worse.





Sigh, I didn't say she should be prohibited, quit tossing up a straw man so easily. I said that if she truly wants to make an impact she can do so in the political arena, but we both know she won't do that.

Work on your arguments and reading what I type, not what you want to think I typed.

Okay so you don't know what Meryl Steep said. You concede that Trump imitated the reporter, but you still claim she lied. It seems that your case is purely built on ignorance and confirmation bias.
 
Why is it ok to mock Trump incessantly but Trump can't mock people who aren't even disabled without being attacked?

Ah, you know, President-Elect, bully pulpit and that sort of thing. Beyond that the disabled reporter he mocked was disabled and Trump mocked his disability.
 
Ah, you know, President-Elect, bully pulpit and that sort of thing. Beyond that the disabled reporter he mocked was disabled and Trump mocked his disability.

So, it is the left's opinion that it is ok to mock people, as long as they are not disabled.
 
2020 is a long way away. He may or may not have a chance in 2020.

So we get 4 more years of childlike loser bitching. Or more probably eight.

Hopefully 4. Trump's bitching gets annoying after awhile.
 
That was yesterday's trump deflection.

Today we're focused on the racist who'll become the AG face of his admin .

And when that one becomes a lost cause, you'll conjure up another one.
 
Last edited:
And when that
one becomes a lost cause, you'll conjure up another one.

We're currently playing the GOPrussian playbook from 11/4/2008 until a new edition comes out .
 
We're currently playing the GOPrussian playbook from 11/4/2008 until a new edition comes out .

Trump rewrote the playbook. You might want to pick up a copy of the new one.
 
Trump rewrote the playbook. You might want to pick up a copy of the new one.

trumpgates will make the Teapot dome scandal and Watergate look like business as usual in trumpistan.

trump's cabinet picks and treatment of the intelligence agencies are spiraling this Nation towards a police state .
 
And when that one becomes a lost cause, you'll conjure up another one.

Public opinion is never a lost cause when you do what the GOP did in Obama's first two years.

Welcome to leadership, learning how to say YES, and actually having a plan to REPLACE, which GOPols don't have .
 
Okay so you don't know what Meryl Steep said. You concede that Trump imitated the reporter, but you still claim she lied. It seems that your case is purely built on ignorance and confirmation bias.

So you don't want a conversation, you want to falsely portray what I type?

I know exactly what she said. I am saying she is ignoring the evidence that Trump portrayed two people who were not disabled in the same fashion. I am not saying she is lying, I am saying she is painting a narrative without considering all of the facts.

You need to follow your arguments through, not set up false arguments to knock down so you can move on. Care to address your argument that I said she was prohibited from free speech or are you going with running away from that, too?
 
So you don't want a conversation, you want to falsely portray what I type?

I know exactly what she said. I am saying she is ignoring the evidence that Trump portrayed two people who were not disabled in the same fashion. I am not saying she is lying, I am saying she is painting a narrative without considering all of the facts.

You need to follow your arguments through, not set up false arguments to knock down so you can move on. Care to address your argument that I said she was prohibited from free speech or are you going with running away from that, too?

What "evidence" did she ignore?

"It was that moment when the person asking to sit in the most respected seat in our country imitated a disabled reporter. Someone he outranked in privilege, power and the capacity to fight back."

He DID "imitate a disabled reporter." He actually, factually, did that. It's recorded on video.

Stop mischaracterizing her argument and then whining about how i'm mischaracterizing yours when i'm not. I'm pointing out that her depiction was factually robust.
 
What "evidence" did she ignore?

"It was that moment when the person asking to sit in the most respected seat in our country imitated a disabled reporter. Someone he outranked in privilege, power and the capacity to fight back."

He DID "imitate a disabled reporter." He actually, factually, did that. It's recorded on video.

Stop mischaracterizing her argument and then whining about how i'm mischaracterizing yours when i'm not. I'm pointing out that her depiction was factually robust.

He did not imitate him because he portrayed non disabled people in the same manner. Still running away from your other crappy arguments I see.
 
Public opinion is never a lost cause when you do what the GOP did in Obama's first two years.

Welcome to leadership, learning how to say YES, and actually having a plan to REPLACE, which GOPols don't have .

Apparently you've already started the selection process for your next lost cause.

Do the Democrats have an Obamacare fix plan? I hadn't heard about that one.
 
Apparently you've already started the selection process for your next lost cause.

Do the Democrats have an Obamacare fix plan? I hadn't heard about that one.

You forgot it was the GOP that's been promising a REPLACE for the last SIX years since they took the House.

Why do GOPosters not expect their politicians to keep their word?

Why do GOPosters support a GOP congress that can't work with each other?

When will the Majority party give us REPLACE with repeal ?
 
He did not imitate him because he portrayed non disabled people in the same manner. Still running away from your other crappy arguments I see.

The fact that his retard impression was already well established does not change the fact that he imitated the reporter.

Trump says "You've got to see this guy," does an impression in the reporters voice, and you claim that he did not imitate the reporter...?

How the **** can you make such a dishonest claim?
 
you are not being honest again. There is no evidence they knew each other well at the time. what evidence do you have.

“Donald and I were on a first-name basis for years,” Kovaleski told the Times in November. “I’ve interviewed him in his office,” he added. “I’ve talked to him at press conferences. All in all, I would say around a dozen times, I’ve interacted with him as a reporter while I was at The Daily News.” In particular, Kovaleski covered the launch of the Trump Shuttle, spending the day with Trump in 1989 when the airline launched with typical Trump brashness.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...g-a-disabled-reporter/?utm_term=.5fccb1dd37a7



On top of that, Trump said, "you gotta see this guy!" and referring to him as "poor guy." Why would he say these things if he didn't know what he looked like? Trump is a ****ing perpetual liar. Just admit it.
 
Why should Ms. Streep be allowed to tell lies and get away with it? She is just another rich, entitled, Hollywood liberals telling lies to other rich, entitled, Hollywood liberals that desperately want to believe the lies.

and exactly what lies did she tell?
 
Back
Top Bottom