• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Assange To Hannity: Source For WikiLeaks Was Not Russian Government

Grim17 said:
It's possible that that the Russians did hack into the DNC, and the documents obtained by Wikileaks were not derived from that Russian hack.

The only reason the source of the Wikileaks documents is important, is because the Russian narrative is being used by the left in an attempt to delegitimize the election of Donald Trump.
Click to expand...

I don't think that is going anywhere. But the need to deal with hacking from overseas is certainly real.
 
Ragin Cajin said:
So we are trusting the founder of Wikileaks over the F.B.I and C.I.A over whether the Russians are hacking or not?
Click to expand...

I am trusting my own judgment based on circumstances and timing. I don't think the WikiLeaks releases came from hacking at all, with the exception of the phishing email that Podesta stupidly fell for. The releases once they started, kept coming and many of them had fairly current information. To me it's obvious that the majority of WikiLeaks came were leaked from one or more DNC insiders, likely in retaliation for how Bernie Sanders was treated.
 
jmotivator said:
Yes, but that is one of those things that the Democrats can't come to terms with right now. They can't admit it is their own failings that have cost them everything. They need a boogeyman.
Click to expand...

Exactly. They need a boogeyman to push a narrative that they desperately hope will delegitimize Trump's election. they don't want to accept that what really happened was that the DNC fixing the primaries for Hillary backfired on them in a big way.
 
ocean515 said:
I have a hard time believing the Coast Guard, the Department of Energy, and the Drug Enforcement Agency spent much time reviewing the evidence, so I'm not all in on the "17 agencies" claim.

We should get to the bottom of it, but as of yet, not one single agency has definitively stated, without any doubt, the Russian Government was behind the exposure of Hillary's graft, corruption, lies and deceit.
Click to expand...

Add to that, some of the intelligence agencies that should have info have been politicized.
 
Fletch said:
Didn't those same intelligence agencies along with the intelligence agencies of every nation on earth determine that Saddam had WMD? How did that turn out?
Click to expand...

The libruls are attempting to have it both ways.
 
ObamacareFail said:
Add to that, some of the intelligence agencies that should have info have been politicized.
Click to expand...

That may very well be. I have yet to read the definitive absolutes about Russia.

However, I sure am reading an endless supply of reports from the now completely illegitimate fake news MSM sources making such claims.

It would seem we will be getting some more solid information in the coming days.

I'm not holding my breath on the "definitive" proof side, as I expect the "Intelligence Community" is going to punt some of the specifics by claiming more details could expose methodology they don't want to give away.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom