• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whom does the EU support?

robinfred

Banned
Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
ukraine-eu-us-azarov.jpg


Lately they have been talking a lot about the aimed to Europe integrational process of Ukraine. Earlier EU and USA politics almost promised the new Ukrainian powers the NATO and EU membership. Now they fortunately have completely forgotten about it. I will explain you why.

Foremost, Ukraine is going to be an “ankle” drowning the European economy and filling work positions with low-paid and low-qualified staff. We all remember the Greek example which tends to be the best possible warning for Europe.

Secondly, we are trying to communicate with all-illegitimate Ukrainian ruling group. According to a former Ukrainian parliament (the Rada) member and now an opposition politician Vladimir Oleynik (you can read the whole article on http://perevorot.info/Perevorot-eng.pdf ) a totally unconstitutional change of power in Ukraine did not take the official power out of the former Ukrainian leader Viktor Yanukovich. Oleinik also says that Ukrainian president cannot be changed by a coup d’état or revolutionary events.

Washington and Brussels should think twice dealing with Poroshenko and his team in order not to get troubled in the future. Only time will tell us which way we should have gone but now we must try to minimize all the possible negative effects of our giving political preferences to an unreliable power in Ukraine.
 
ukraine-eu-us-azarov.jpg


Lately they have been talking a lot about the aimed to Europe integrational process of Ukraine. Earlier EU and USA politics almost promised the new Ukrainian powers the NATO and EU membership. Now they fortunately have completely forgotten about it. I will explain you why.

Foremost, Ukraine is going to be an “ankle” drowning the European economy and filling work positions with low-paid and low-qualified staff. We all remember the Greek example which tends to be the best possible warning for Europe.

Secondly, we are trying to communicate with all-illegitimate Ukrainian ruling group. According to a former Ukrainian parliament (the Rada) member and now an opposition politician Vladimir Oleynik (you can read the whole article on http://perevorot.info/Perevorot-eng.pdf ) a totally unconstitutional change of power in Ukraine did not take the official power out of the former Ukrainian leader Viktor Yanukovich. Oleinik also says that Ukrainian president cannot be changed by a coup d’état or revolutionary events.

Washington and Brussels should think twice dealing with Poroshenko and his team in order not to get troubled in the future. Only time will tell us which way we should have gone but now we must try to minimize all the possible negative effects of our giving political preferences to an unreliable power in Ukraine.

That, anyway, is the storyboard on RTTV. It is rather simplistic and leaves out the important pieces. But I am sure you know that.
 
Foremost, Ukraine is going to be an “ankle” drowning the European economy and filling work positions with low-paid and low-qualified staff.

I think you meant "anchor", but point taken.
 
Back
Top Bottom