• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump: No 'big' vacations, no salary as president

ARealConservative said:
so you could link to some proof of this problem you had, right?

waiting.......
Click to expand...

Keep on waiting or just search back through my posts. Don't really give a ****. I do have some problems with Obama's administration and that was one of them.
 
poweRob said:
Keep on waiting or just search back through my posts. Don't really give a ****. I do have some problems with Obama's administration and that was one of them.
Click to expand...
I already knew you couldn't find anything

you are a hyper-partisan

you don't care about transparency. if you did, you would of said something about one of the least transparent presidents in our history. you have never said jack **** about it. you only post about complaints about the other side - which is why you are a hyper-partisan.

thanks for exposing yourself. I appreciate it!
 
j-mac said:
He didn't "skip" anything...He used a legal, and commonly used business tax strategy....But you know that.
Click to expand...

Did he? Prove it.
 
coldjoint said:
Well if you think your views are all that why aren't you still in power?
Click to expand...

I was never in power? I don't work for the government or have an affiliation other than civil with my government. Please learn to formulate sentences properly.
 
Henrin said:
You said the majority of the country voted for Hillary.
Click to expand...

Of the people who can and got up to vote, most voted for Hillary. Most did, decidedly smaller fractions of voters voted for other candidates, however as our system finds that entirely irrelevant, people in smaller states got a decidedly larger share in the future of the country. I am explaining the first past the post system to somebody who has been on a debate site for like a decade. Again, why do I need to specify for you? If you add up all of the people who voted, Hillary currently stands at the highest number. Why is this difficult for you to automatically deduce in a conversation?
 
Hatuey said:
I was never in power? I don't work for the government or have an affiliation other than civil with my government. Please learn to formulate sentences properly.
Click to expand...

That's a good thing, right?
 
coldjoint said:
That's a good thing, right?
Click to expand...

Neither are you. Are you aware that you are not actually in power of a government? This is cute. I get to laugh at your silly defense of the great sacrifice this alleged multi-billionaire is making by giving up $400,000.

It's almost like the zeroes don't make much a difference for you because Trump won and **** math.

:lol:
 
Hatuey said:
Neither are you. Are you aware that you are not actually in power of a government? This is cute. I get to laugh at your silly defense of the great sacrifice this alleged multi-billionaire is making by giving up $400,000.

It's almost like the zeroes don't make much a difference for you because Trump won and **** math.

:lol:
Click to expand...

Fine with me.
 
coldjoint said:
Fine with me.
Click to expand...

You do understand that Trump's finances will not be hurt in any realistic way if he is as rich as he says he is? Yes?
 
Hatuey said:
You do understand that Trump's finances will not be hurt in any realistic way if he is as rich as he says he is? Yes?
Click to expand...

Do you understand I do not care how much money he has?
 
coldjoint said:
Do you understand I do not care how much money he has?
Click to expand...

But you'll defend his decision not to take more money? You're not making much sense.
 
Hatuey said:
But you'll defend his decision not to take more money? You're not making much sense.
Click to expand...

Do you see the bolded? It is his decision.
 
coldjoint said:
Do you see the bolded? It is his decision.
Click to expand...

Great, it's up for public scrutiny as he is now a public figure and public servant. Are you having trouble with this too? Or will I have to do like I did with Henrin and start with an explanation of the first past the post system?

When do you think he's just going to start ignoring and gutting NAFTA and NATO?

:lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom