• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News Apologizes for Inaccurate Hillary Clinton Report

Conservative said:
Because history shows those results from people who surround Hillary Clinton but in the liberal world you can delegate responsibility but in the real world you cannot. The actions of surrogates for Hillary are a reflection and the responsibility of Hillary. it is the Hillary results that should be the issue not what she says. Why is it exactly that you believe she will change when in office?
Click to expand...

Delegating responsibility? Is that what you want to talk about? Why don't you ask John Kasich about what duties Trump would delegate as president in the "conservative world"?

What do I want HRC To change? FFS, revisit my post where that was covered in detail. You say you read that, but it's hard to believe.
 
RickJames3000 said:
Delegating responsibility? Is that what you want to talk about? Why don't you ask John Kasich about what duties Trump would delegate as president in the "conservative world"?

What do I want HRC To change? FFS, revisit my post where that was covered in detail. You say you read that, but it's hard to believe.
Click to expand...

You delegate authority, NOT RESPONSIBILITY. Then when someone violates that authority you fire them, not reward them for higher office or position
 
bubbabgone said:
Where'd you hear that?
On a related matter ... did you hear about the Wiki emails from Neera Tanden ...
"I hope Hillary truly understands now how bat**** crazy David Brock is."
Click to expand...

Breitbart funded the writing of the book, and now they are giving it away free.
The source was RMS.

Here's the Wiki page, please note all the corrections the publishers had to do after publication.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Cash

I hadn't heard about the Neera Tanden emails, but I would not disagree with her assessment of Brock.
 
late said:
Breitbart funded the writing of the book, and now they are giving it away free.
The source was RMS.

Here's the Wiki page, please note all the corrections the publishers had to do after publication.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Cash

I hadn't heard about the Neera Tanden emails, but I would not disagree with her assessment of Brock.
Click to expand...

Is this truly someone you want in the WH?

Clinton aide says Foundation paid for Chelsea?s wedding, WikiLeaks emails show | Fox News
 
Conservative said:
Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. Please tell me which policy of Obama that Hillary was against?
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter what policy she may or may not have been against. It was her duty to carry out her responsibilities as Secretary of State and her job to go forward with orders from the POTUS as they apply to foreign policy. Such has been the case with every Secretary of State who preceded her.

as Hillary was part of the Obama Administration, supported the stimulus and ACA. Clearly you ignore the actual results
Click to expand...

Now, here's where you have no idea what you're talking about. The Secretary of State position deals more with brokering foreign business relations and has very little if anything to do with domestic economic policy. Now granted, the business relations that are forged between U.S. entities and foreign governments/business do eventually filter down into the U.S. economy, but at their origins they have nothing to do with domestic policies, such as the ARRA (stimulus bill) or the PPACA (ObamaCare).

So, for you to continue with this "guilt by association" character assassination is just foolish. You'd be better off sticking to foreign policy matters when discussing her pitfalls than trying to link her to domestic issues.
 
Objective Voice;1066509785]Doesn't matter what policy she may or may not have been against. It was her duty to carry out her responsibilities as Secretary of State and her job to go forward with orders from the POTUS as they apply to foreign policy. Such has been the case with every Secretary of State who preceded her.
Click to expand...

Did her duties including selling influence and getting donations for her foundation? Name for me the foreign policy successes she had as SoS?

Now, here's where you have no idea what you're talking about. The Secretary of State position deals more with brokering foreign business relations and has very little if anything to do with domestic economic policy. Now granted, the business relations that are forged between U.S. entities and foreign governments/business do eventually filter down into the U.S. economy, but at their origins they have nothing to do with domestic policies, such as the ARRA (stimulus bill) or the PPACA (ObamaCare).

So, for you to continue with this "guilt by association" character assassination is just foolish. You'd be better off sticking to foreign policy matters when discussing her pitfalls than trying to link her to domestic issues.
Click to expand...

Her support for Obama policies indicate what she would do as President and her results as Sec. of State show what kind of job she would do on foreign policy. Guess you have very low standards and expectations
 
late said:
Breitbart funded the writing of the book, and now they are giving it away free.
The source was RMS.

Here's the Wiki page, please note all the corrections the publishers had to do after publication.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Cash

I hadn't heard about the Neera Tanden emails, but I would not disagree with her assessment of Brock.
Click to expand...

Schweizer is an editor-at-large for Breitbart and I assume they pay him for his work, is that your point?
Harper-Collins published the book.
I think you may be confusing the film with the book vis-a-vis Breitbart giving something away.
The book was a best seller.
It's a legit piece of work that you shouldn't let yourself dismiss because Brock and Salon said so.

The NYT, through their own investigation, confirmed some of the story lines in Clinton Cash as noted in your link.
I know about the "corrections".
There were several. "all the corrections" is a mis-characterization and corrections to a book after publication is not unusual.
One listed in the piece was ... "FactCheck.org found Schweizer's assertion that Clinton, as Secretary of State, could have stopped Russia from buying a company with extensive uranium mining operations in the U.S. to be false."
That may also be a mis-characterization because Schweizer didn't say Hillary could have stopped the Uranium deal. He made a point of saying her objections could have "kicked it up to the President".
(FactCheck and Politifact both do that a lot ... they declare to be false a claim no one made. Clever, but a dishonest practice for a fact checker)
Another related point Schweizer made was that Hillary had, up to then, been a hard-liner on foreign investments in USA strategic assets. Not so with this one that made them and the Foundation big bucks.

What on earth is RMS?

Pretty much anyone can edit wikipedia but regardless, that link was quite favorable to the book. I'm surprised you posted it.
And "Media Matters criticized these two newspapers for failing to report in a timely fashion on inaccuracies that had been discovered in the book." was my point about Brock.
A whole lot of insanity about a lot of things can be traced to Brock.
Oh, and Salon doesn't like Schweizer either. Big surprise.
 
late said:
This will wind up in the trash along with the other 99.99999% of what the Right says.
Click to expand...

What is it about liberalism that creates this kind of passion and loyalty? Are you ever going to answer a direct question, how much dependence and debt is enough for you?
 
Conservative said:
Yes, how she voted but you don't seem to get it, what did she accomplish? Did her jobs bill for NY pass? What are her actual results? rhetoric is what you want to believe. She has zero private sector experience and has promoted massive growth in the Federal Govt. Apparently that is what you want. How much debt and dependence is enough for you?
Click to expand...

You have her record, found out for yourself if you're actually interested.
 
Cardinal said:
You have her record, found out for yourself if you're actually interested.
Click to expand...

Yes, I have her record which is why I voted for Trump. Do you ever answer direct questions? How much dependence and debt is enough for you? You are voting for the status quo therefore 20 trillion in debt and over 100 million dependent on the taxpayers for assistance isn't enough so what is your answer?
 
Conservative said:
Yes, I have her record which is why I voted for Trump. Do you ever answer direct questions? How much dependence and debt is enough for you? You are voting for the status quo therefore 20 trillion in debt and over 100 million dependent on the taxpayers for assistance isn't enough so what is your answer?
Click to expand...

Then vote for the person you feel is best qualified to be President on Tuesday. I know you will vote your conscience.
 
Cardinal said:
Then vote for the person you feel is best qualified to be President on Tuesday. I know you will vote your conscience.
Click to expand...

Already did, just waiting for an answer from any liberal to the question, how much debt and dependence is enough? Obviously 20 trillion in debt and 100 million dependent isn't enough for you so you have to give us more years of Obama in the form of Hillary
 
Conservative said:
Already did, just waiting for an answer from any liberal to the question, how much debt and dependence is enough? Obviously 20 trillion in debt and 100 million dependent isn't enough for you so you have to give us more years of Obama in the form of Hillary
Click to expand...

Congratulations on participating in the Democratic process. It pains me whenever I hear someone so demoralized that they claim their vote is worthless, only to go and prove the point by not voting.
 
Cardinal said:
I predict that Baier's honesty will inspire right wing hacks on this site to properly vet their sources from now on before posting stories that are too good to be true.

I also predict that the Swedish Bikini Team will show up on my doorstep and offer to have a group orgy with me, and that my wife will give me permission.
Click to expand...

Fox News just reported the Swedish Bikini Team is on their way to your house... :lol:
 
Cardinal said:
I predict that Baier's honesty will inspire right wing hacks on this site to properly vet their sources from now on before posting stories that are too good to be true.

I also predict that the Swedish Bikini Team will show up on my doorstep and offer to have a group orgy with me, and that my wife will give me permission.
Click to expand...

Not all Fox is Hannity? Baier and Shepard Smith do a very good job...
 
SheWolf said:
Fox News just reported the Swedish Bikini Team is on their way to your house... :lol:
Click to expand...

But you know that they are all Americans... right?
 
Cardinal said:
Congratulations on participating in the Democratic process. It pains me whenever I hear someone so demoralized that they claim their vote is worthless, only to go and prove the point by not voting.
Click to expand...

But it is potentially worthless in many MANY instances... not to mention we have instances like this Electoral Voter who is refusing to vote Trump even if his constituency votes that way.
 
Bodhisattva said:
But it is potentially worthless in many MANY instances... not to mention we have instances like this Electoral Voter who is refusing to vote Trump even if his constituency votes that way.
Click to expand...

Yes, that will happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom