• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge issues restraining order against Trump campaign re: voter-harassment fears[W:32

Re: Judge issues restraining order against Trump campaign over voter-harassment fears

Paperview said:
How about reading it? It should dawn on you (or not) immediately who it applies to.
Click to expand...

I've read it. Now, it's time for you to support your claim.
 
Re: Judge issues restraining order against Trump campaign over voter-harassment fears

apdst said:
I've read it. Now, it's time for you to support your claim.
Click to expand...

YOU are the one who made the claim the Hatch Act applied to Federal judges. How about you trot out the language of the Act and prove what you're claiming.

I'm pretty sure you can't.
 
Re: Judge issues restraining order against Trump campaign over voter-harassment fears

This is the part where we see what's known as Poster Tuck Tail 'n Run.
 
Re: Judge issues restraining order against Trump campaign over voter-harassment fears

JumpinJack said:
You got it. There was proof that there were plans to do it, or it was being done already, or the judge wouldn't have granted a restraining order.

Clinton has not broken the law, and she most certainly isn't sending off-duty armed law enforcement to "certain areas" to "watch things." That's the stuff that neo-Nazis do.
Click to expand...

And people in third world countries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom