• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sources: 99 percent chance foreign intel agencies breached Clinton server

Deflect! Deflect! Deflect! WARNING WARNING, DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!!!! :hitsfan::lamo
Come on now. What else would you expect a diehard partisan to do. It's in their blood.
 
From Politico on October 8, 2015:

Hillary Clinton's private email server containing tens of thousands of messages from her tenure as secretary of state — including more than 400 now considered classified —was the subject of hacking attempts from China, South Korea and Germany after she stepped down in 2013, according to Congressional investigators.

The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee has found evidence of attempted intrusions into Clinton's server in 2013 and 2014, according to a letterChairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) sent Monday to a Florida-based security firm tasked with protecting the hardware. Clinton server faced hacking from China, South Korea and Germany - POLITICO

According to Chairman Johnson,Clinton's sever may have lacked a threat-detection program for three months.

How naïve it would be to assume that no hack-attack was ever successful!
 
You're the one desperate to convince people that "there's nothing to see here folks, no lies or corruption" and we all know why.

I say, let them investigate all they want. But you guys are already assigning guilt over anonymous sources. I guess Trump sexually assaulted all those people too because those are sources as well.
 
I have been reading stuff on Wikileaks that is just nuts. It is going to get YUGELY better. It makes the Donna Brazile stuff look like a non issue. I am seeing a lot of chatter about a must see dump on the 5th. I am skeptical but the sources have been right so far. The content is what makes me skeptical.

Sort of reminds you of the Mafia wiretaps of previous years, doesn't it?
 
He's right, why not 98% why not 86%, oh yeah, because they just pulled that out of their asses. 99% leaves a 1% so when it's found out to be BS, they just go "Well we told you it wasn't 100%". Gimme a break, anonymous sources, FBI won't confirm what it says, this thing smells of desperation by right wing nutjobs.

Have you ever heard of something called "a figure of speech"? You should look it up. ;)
 
Have you ever heard of something called "a figure of speech"? You should look it up. ;)

Translation: "Yes, the 99% was pulled out of the ass by the article writer".

Thank you for admitting that.
 
Translation: "Yes, the 99% was pulled out of the ass by the article writer".

Thank you for admitting that.

If only there was a 99% chance her server hadn't been hacked. You people would be all over that
 
If only there was a 99% chance her server hadn't been hacked. You people would be all over that

Nice projection. Fact is it is you guys touting this as fact.
 
Translation: "Yes, the 99% was pulled out of the ass by the article writer".

Thank you for admitting that.

Here's a hint, it's the same thing as 100%.
 
What do we think the chances are that foreign intel agencies breached the RNCInc servers which housed those 22 missing emails from the Bush administration...?
 
Yeah, there's always the possibility Hillary was selling access to her server.

Or the most likely scenario is the right is full of **** as usual.
 
Or the most likely scenario is the right is full of **** as usual.

Why don't you put a percentage on that so the right can make fun of you later? Oh wait. You just showed up for the election. I almost forgot.
 
View attachment 67209506

So Fox have started referring to phishing emails as hacking attempts.

Cute.

If that's the case, then all of us have been victims of attempted hackers thousands of times.

Uh, phishing is a form of hacking. "Hacking" is a pretty broad term. It is not just what you see in movies with someone actively sitting at a computer typing code that eventually comes up with a huge "ACCESS GRANTED".
 
Why don't you put a percentage on that so the right can make fun of you later? Oh wait. You just showed up for the election. I almost forgot.

Oh oh oh, can I pull a number out of my ass just like the right did with the 99%?
 
View attachment 67209506

So Fox have started referring to phishing emails as hacking attempts.

Cute.

If that's the case, then all of us have been victims of attempted hackers thousands of times.

Phishing attacks ARE hacking attempts. That's exactly how the DNC server got hacked, with what is known as a spear phishing attack.;)
 
Back
Top Bottom