• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI's Clinton Foundation investigation now 'a very high priority,' sources say

I'm not laughing; I'm just sick about this. Sick for our nation. Sick for those who have already cast ballots in states that don't provide an opportunity to amend their votes.
 
I'm not laughing; I'm just sick about this. Sick for our nation. Sick for those who have already cast ballots in states that don't provide an opportunity to amend their votes.

Keep the faith. 6 days is an eternity in presidential politics. Redemption!
 
THe hacker chatter? Oh you mean Assange and Wikileaks cause that is the only major hacker chatter.

At least we know one person that doesn't know anything about the subject.
 
Not really. To me, it's all conspiracy-type stuff until we see some good evidence. It is, however, interesting that we're starting to get murmurs of this reported in the mainstream media.

cyberzeist
 
So will the Assistant AG and dear friend of Podesta Peter Kadzik recuse himself?

He became a high profile figure in the last two days. Usually there is hollering by one side or the other (political figures) calling for someone's head at this point but it has been pretty quiet and I wonder why. I have noticed that the heads of the oversight committees have been real quiet about a lot of things lately.
 
Last edited:
So then there isn't really chatter in the "hacker community" other than Wikileaks.

Again, you know nothing about what you speak. Is this a pattern? I bet it is.
 
So will the Assistant AG and dear friend of Podesta Peter Kadzik recuse himself?
That would require a level of integrity slightly higher than a mafia soldier, so don't count on it.
 
I disagree, Clinton's now-gone landslide trajectory was due in large part to the now-temporary Trump implosion. As Trump has resurged, Clinton's massive lead is now gone. It was supposed to be Trump making Clinton look good by comparison, now the roles have reversed.

I agree in part with this. Clinton was losing major ground while her surrogates in the MSM were still lying about her imaginary 12 point lead. But this steady drip drip drip of revelations about the Clinton crime family has certainly played a major role in her fall from grace.
 
So if she wins next week, this all stops ?
Does she load up the FBI and DOJ with her cronies and then claim it was all just a vast right wing conspiracy ?

Or does she have them do some bs investigation that of-course leads to her innocence ?
Im trying to imagine the optics of such a thing.

Because this is corruption beyond measure and so much of it has already seen the light of day already just through wikileaks.
Yep. And you can expect destruction of government documents like you've never seen before.
 
I heard tonight on my way home something about a decision stemming out of the Clinton 1 debacle where the SC ruled that a sitting President couldn't be charged with a crime or something like that....Anyone know anything about that?
 
I heard tonight on my way home something about a decision stemming out of the Clinton 1 debacle where the SC ruled that a sitting President couldn't be charged with a crime or something like that....Anyone know anything about that?

I've never heard of that, but I don't see how that could be Constituional. Not that that means anything.
 
I've never heard of that, but I don't see how that could be Constituional. Not that that means anything.

This is it. It seems the Constitution has seen more of a beating in the last few years than it has in its history. I fear that if we continue on this current trajectory, we might as well consider the document itself a relic of the past with no connection to the country we may soon become.
 
I've never heard of that, but I don't see how that could be Constituional. Not that that means anything.

Something about a sitting President can't have criminal charges against him/her until they are no longer in office....I don't know...
 
Something about a sitting President can't have criminal charges against him/her until they are no longer in office....I don't know...

Nah, it's not true.
 
Back
Top Bottom