• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Huma's email testimony could haunt her as FBI renews probe

American

Trump Grump Whisperer
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
95,987
Reaction score
33,329
Location
SE Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Huma's email testimony could haunt her as FBI renews probe | Fox News

Scrutiny of top Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin intensified Monday amid speculation that claims she made in her FBI interview and a separate sworn deposition could come back to haunt her as the bureau gains access to emails on her estranged husband’s computer.

Abedin, one of Clinton’s most trusted advisers, is married to disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner. An unrelated investigation into allegations Weiner sexted with a 15-year-old North Carolina girl purportedly led investigators to a new email cache that have since kicked the Clinton email server probe back to life.


Abedin seemed to be a no-show Monday on the campaign trail. She also did not travel with Clinton over the weekend to the battleground state of Florida. While Abedin has effectively stepped off the campaign trail since the FBI's stunning announcement on Friday, her emails are now at the center of attention.
I don't see anyone in the Clinton Campaign laughing now. Just more confirmation of Hillary's thorough and unending corruption.
 
There may be some charges coming for lying to the FBI for one or more people. At the least.
 
I have my doubts on it happening, but it would be a hell of a conclusion to this strange campaign season to see Hillary go down Nixon style and perhaps on year one of her Presidency.
 
They'll blame Weiner for dick this up. :lol: I wonder if most people realize that in Germany, his name would be pronounced like winer and not weener.
 
Odds are the FBI has already seen these emails on Clinton's devices. Also, Huma handles the political end of things, not policy.

This is just the next Benghazi, an endless stream of ginned up phony controversies.

The interesting bit is that Trump has a history of destroying and hiding documents that goes back to 1973. That's SOP for him. He has something like 75 court cases going, and he's going to lose some of them, that's baked into the cake.

So why the imbalance, well, there are a couple of reasons for that. One is that she is a women, and bigots tend to be misogynists. But the larger reason is that Republicans lost interest in playing by the rules a very long time ago.
If they hadn't lost interest, there is simply no way a psycho like Trump could become their candidate.
 
Last edited:
I have my doubts on it happening, but it would be a hell of a conclusion to this strange campaign season to see Hillary go down Nixon style and perhaps on year one of her Presidency.
Then neither Hillary nor Trump would be President. I think we could handle that.
 
Odds are the FBI has already seen these emails on Clinton's devices. Also, Huma handles the political end of things, not policy.

This is just the next Benghazi, an endless stream of ginned up phony controversies.

The interesting bit is that Trump has a history of destroying and hiding documents that goes back to 1973. That's SOP for him. He has something like 75 court cases going, and he's going to lose some of them, that's baked into the cake.

So why the imbalance, well, there are a couple of reasons for that. One is that she is a women, and bigots tend to be misogynists. But the larger reason is that Republicans lost interest in playing by the rules a very long time ago.
If they hadn't lost interest, there is simply no way a psycho like Trump could become their candidate.

So youre saying its ok for both of them to destroy and hide documents? Or that both of them are equally unfit to be President?
 
yawn........are you guys going to beat this to death like all of your other manufactured "controversies"? I bet you won't even find a blow job after this one. LOL

The FBI doing an investigation is a manufactured controversy?
 
yawn........are you guys going to beat this to death like all of your other manufactured "controversies"? I bet you won't even find a blow job after this one. LOL

Lol....In other words..." PLUUEEZE STOP TALKING ABOUT THIS ! "


Hey, where's Huma right now ?
 
So youre saying its ok for both of them to destroy and hide documents? Or that both of them are equally unfit to be President?

Sorry, I don't seem to be able to oversimplify life that much.

But I promise I'll try harder to make things a cartoonish caricature.
 
The FBI doing an investigation is a manufactured controversy?

No, the calls of "Hillary is guilty" is manufactured. Only the loony right is saying that.
 
Where's Huma ? If this is just all nothing to do about nothing then why isn't she with Clinton ?

Because it is an investigation. DUH

If Trump's son was involved in an investigation would you expect him to be at his dad's side? God some cons can be morons.
 
Because it is an investigation. DUH

If Trump's son was involved in an investigation would you expect him to be at his dad's side? God some cons can be morons.

You make a post about Trump destroying documents that is so off the wall that it must come from some weird dream, then you call "cons" (who are they?) "morons". Wake the F up, and take a look in the mirror.
 
You make a post about Trump destroying documents that is so off the wall that it must come from some weird dream, then you call "cons" (who are they?) "morons". Wake the F up, and take a look in the mirror.

Where did I make a post about Trump destroying documents?
 
Back
Top Bottom