• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The FBI is reopening its Clinton email probe

late said:
Thanks for proving my point.

The CF is a superb charity, you prefer koolaid.
Click to expand...
Not saying they are or are not but why do you think they are superb. How do you grade them?

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
793(f) is part of The espionage act, enacted during world war 1.

Gorin v. United States was argued in 1941.

The legal history does not support the arguement of prosecuting Clinton.

Hillary Clinton did not do anything on par with the Rosenbergs.
Click to expand...

Incorrect. 793(f) was not actually delineated and authored until Sept. 23, 1950, again, nearly a decade after Gorin v. United States which in any case did not make any kind of explicit ruling or precedent on its language (even if you are of the view that he could set binding precedence for a subsection that did not yet exist), nor could it.

Furthermore, as stated, there have indeed been several successful prosecutions relating to the mishandling of classified information pertinent to the national defense that were without intent.

Hillary perhaps didn't engage in high treason, but she is most certainly guilty of, at _minimum_, a misdemeanour in her egregious mishandling of State Department communications, including content relevant to the national defense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom