• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tech blogger finds proof DNC chief's emails weren't 'doctored' despite claims

I'm tired of stupidity and I'm tired of lies. Either present an actual piece of evidence or admit you don't care about facts, you just want to throw around stupid labels, regardless of how false they are.
You posted cherry picked facts and then formulated opinions based on those cherry picked facts.
You presented no evidence, despite being requested multiples times to do so, which tells me you don't care about facts. Have a good day.
 
You presented no evidence, despite being requested multiples times to do so, which tells me you don't care about facts. Have a good day.

You presented no evidence, only opinions.
 
You presented no evidence, only opinions.
I presented copious amounts of evidence. Even if you disagree with the conclusion drawn from the evidence (which would make you wrong, but I digress), it doesn't change the fact it is a lie to claim no evidence has been presented. Stop posting falsehoods to try and distract from the fact you've posted a lie about CNN without providing a single piece of evidence to support the lie. You've presented no evidence and I've presented lots of evidence. You posting otherwise is simply a lie. You obviously have zero desire to discuss this objectively and zero desire to support anything you've said.

I'm tired of dishonesty. Do you have evidence or not?
 
Last edited:
I presented copious amounts of evidence. Even if you disagree with the conclusion drawn from the evidence (which would make you wrong, but I digress), it doesn't change the fact it is a lie to claim no evidence has been presented. Stop posting falsehoods to try and distract from the fact you've posted a lie about CNN without providing a single piece of evidence to support the lie. You've presented no evidence and I've presented lots of evidence. You posting otherwise is simply a lie. You obviously have zero desire to discuss this objectively and zero desire to support anything you've said.

I'm tired of dishonesty. Do you have evidence or not?

Do you?

WikiLeaks show CNN reaching out to Dems for Trump questions - KTAR.com
 
I've given you evidence. You claiming otherwise would be a lie.

Yeah, so?

Your source said:
But CNN said it does the same with Republicans as part of efforts to present the best interviews.

“When preparing for interviews, we are regularly sent suggestions from rival campaigns and political parties, both solicited and unsolicited,” said CNN spokeswoman Lauren Pratapas. “Casting a wide net to ensure a tough and fair interview isn’t just common media practice, it’s smart.”
What's your point?
 
I've given you evidence. You claiming otherwise would be a lie.


Yeah, so?


What's your point?

That's what I say about your so-called "evidence", yeah, so? You ask me for evidence, I give you evidence, and you don't accept it, just like I don't accept your evidence. What's the point about me giving you evidence if you are just going to dismiss it anyway?
 
That's what I say about your so-called "evidence", yeah, so?
Do you really not see the difference? I give you evidence about stories CNN has covered, the conservatives guests/analysts they hire, etc. That's actual evidence. You citing a link in which your own claim is debunked within your source is not evidence.

Do you really not understand how evidence works?
You ask me for evidence, I give you evidence, and you don't accept it
Yes, because your own source proved you wrong. It's not that I didn't like it, it's that your own source said you are wrong. Don't blame me because you posted a stupid example.

just like I don't accept your evidence.
My evidence doesn't contradict my point. :shrug:

What's the point about me giving you evidence if you are just going to dismiss it anyway?
I didn't dismiss it, your own source invalidated your argument. Learn how evidence actually works, for goodness sake.
 
Last edited:
Do you really not see the difference? I give you evidence about stories CNN has covered, the conservatives guests/analysts they hire, etc. That's actual evidence. You citing a link in which your own claim is debunked within your source is not evidence.

Do you really not understand how evidence works?
Yes, because your own source proved you wrong. It's not that I didn't like it, it's that your own source said you are wrong. Don't blame me because you posted a stupid example.

My evidence doesn't contradict my point. :shrug:

I didn't dismiss it, your own source invalidated your argument. Learn how evidence actually works, for goodness sake.

You are too partisan to see that your evidence is not evidence at all but opinion where my evidence actually really is evidence.
 
You are too partisan to see that your evidence is not evidence at all but opinion where my evidence actually really is evidence.
:lol:

So, in your opinion, pointing out stories covered and copious conservative commentators is not evidence, but posting a source which contradicts your position is evidence. Like I said long ago, you clearly aren't interested in facts, just spewing partisan falsehoods. It was displayed during the Net Neutrality debate and it is confirmed here.

I'm done dealing with a refusal to acknowledge reality. Have a great day.
 
:lol:

So, in your opinion, pointing out stories covered and copious conservative commentators is not evidence, but posting a source which contradicts your position is evidence. Like I said long ago, you clearly aren't interested in facts, just spewing partisan falsehoods. It was displayed during the Net Neutrality debate and it is confirmed here.

I'm done dealing with a refusal to acknowledge reality. Have a great day.

How are you with the reality that Trump won the election and crooked Hillary and the Clinton Crime Syndicate have been retired for good?
 
Back
Top Bottom