Clinton Out With New Ad Featuring Khizr Khan

Cryptic said:

Neither do I.

They ran him in ads immediately after the convention, but then backed off. Khan seemed to be veering off message a little by branching into other socio political commentary not related to his son's sacrifice. This might have made the democrats nervous. Thus, I think they shelved planned commercials and waited to see how Khan developed. They then decided to use his very effective core message as part of the "grand finale".

Click to expand...

What is Kahn's core message, that he will say anything if paid enough money?

Mason66 said:

What is Kahn's core message, that he will say anything if paid enough money?

Click to expand...

"I'm Muslim! Look at meeeee! Hear meeeee! Love meeee! Cater to meeee! Coddle meeee! Revolve around meeee! Becoz I've got a sad droopy hound dog face, and - like God - I have a son who died for you a̶f̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶h̶e̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶k̶i̶l̶l̶e̶d̶ ̶b̶y̶ ̶M̶u̶s̶l̶i̶m̶s̶"

sanman said:

"I'm Muslim! Look at meeeee! Hear meeeee! Love meeee! Cater to meeee! Coddle meeee! Revolve around meeee! Becoz I've got a sad droopy hound dog face, and - like God - I have a son who died for you a̶f̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶h̶e̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶k̶i̶l̶l̶e̶d̶ ̶b̶y̶ ̶M̶u̶s̶l̶i̶m̶s̶"

Click to expand...

Do you think insulting the parents of fallen US soldiers is a good way to win over undecided voters?

Politicshead said:

Do you think insulting the parents of fallen US soldiers is a good way to win over undecided voters?

Click to expand...

I think parents of fallen US soldiers would think that callously using their dead children for political purposes...especially by one of the politicians who sent their child to war...would be a greater insult.

Politicshead said:

Do you think insulting the parents of fallen US soldiers is a good way to win over undecided voters?

Click to expand...

I think this guy has a chip on his shoulders due to his ethnic pride, and he's trying to blame Trump for saying something reasonable, while using his kid as a prop to do it.

Hey Khizr Khan! Guess who killed your son! Wasn't Trump - it was those precious Radical Muslims whom you are reluctant to name. And it's that reluctance of so many like you which is the real reason why Radical Islam continues to flourish and grow as a threat, and kill more people!

This election has popularized the word "pivot" - but Muslims seem to have learned pivoting from the time the Koran was written.

Politicshead said:

Do you think insulting the parents of fallen US soldiers is a good way to win over undecided voters?

Click to expand...

The Kahn's were not at the convention because of their dead child. They were there because they were paid by the Clinton's and also the father was there to try to take down Trump to protect his financial concerns.

His dead son was a prop in all of that.

Mason66 said:

What is Kahn's core message, that he will say anything if paid enough money?

Click to expand...

Khans core message is that he is a poignant response to a presidential candidate (as opposed to a "guy at a bar") who attacked moslems as a group.

Mason66 said:

The Kahn's were not at the convention because of their dead child. They were there because they were paid by the Clinton's and also the father was there to try to take down Trump to protect his financial concerns.

Click to expand...

Khan was no more paid by the Clintons than the relatives of the Benghazi dead were paid by Trump. Thinking objectively about the campaign, one can easily see that

A. Khan has a very valid message that swing voters might find appealing (of course this message was sought out by the democrats, then rehearsed)
B. Donald Trump has a valid message that some black voters may find appealing (of course Trump's outreach started after the race).

Hard core Trumpers refuse to see 'A'. Hardcore Clintonistas will never acknowledge 'B'.

Cryptic said:

Khans core message is that he is a poignant response to a presidential candidate (as opposed to a "guy at a bar") who attacked moslems as a group.

Click to expand...

Trump never attacked Muslims as a group.

I'm going to break it down a little....

Fearandloathing said:

You are thinking like Trump. Blame. Blame creates hate. hate kills nations.

Click to expand...

Like it or not "blame" as you call it is a fact....The division in this party didn't happen organically, actions were taken, and pro-active dissent and division were fomented by the never Trump'ers....That's on you guys NOT those of us trying to defeat the Criminal Hillary.

The job now is to demand accountability from the elected, whoever they are.

Click to expand...

Blah, Blah, Blah....We said the same thing when Obama was elected, and the repubs laid down for damned near everything, because they were afraid of being labeled racists....Now, you want to say the same things when it is clearly demonstrated that the system is corrupted, and she would never be prosecuted for ANYTHING she does....You have a chance for accountability right now, it's called the election, and you are throwing it away because you don't like the personality of the nominee....Surely not real issues. So, spare me the accountability speech, it's just lip service.

But it's absurd to blame people who saw Trump for what he is and the people who worked to expose him. I figure they have averted nuclear war or worse.

Click to expand...

That's nonsense straight out of the DNC, and MSM....You are being played.

Any blame lies with those Americans who lined up and armed themselves with hate and voted likewise with this guy. That's all the guy offered and too many people bought it for their own ends.

Click to expand...

Again, propaganda. Do you even know what his positions are on the issues?

Mason66 said:

Trump never attacked Muslims as a group.

Click to expand...

At various times, Trump has publically mused about not letting citizen or green card hold moslems return to the United States should they leave and has also mused about closing down mosques.

Hillary Clinton was airborne to Lebanon on the day that Brittanee Drexel disappeared. Several days previous, the Manchester Constable released 11 Pakistanis accused of plotting terrorism. Obama released the Bush torture memos in mid-April (Drudge Report, etc.). Brittanee Drexel, Turkish DNA, disappeared in the area where Shannon McConaughey's body was found, and the linking concept is phosphate mining. Obama-Clinton ISIS links to Bataclan at Low Gap, North Carolina, the Siamese twins link at Mount Airy.

The Manchester-Pakistani cases apparently forgot that, when vetting the prisoners, the idea of the old man teaching them was a Pashto speaker with no computer, is compromised: there are Pashto speakers who can understand Urdu, let alone Dari, and this Urdu link is precisely the Alex Jones report for the Urdu material found at the camp on the other side of the U.S.-Mexican border.

The immigration control by the Clinton mafia operates, like their drug trafficking, by proxy. The terror is accomplished by other means than direct msm migrant reports. Thus, the immigration history of Turkish populations to America is on the cutting edge of exposing just how it came to be that an Arab son was smuggled into the White House fronting as an African American.

Cryptic said:

At various times, Trump has publically mused about not letting citizen or green card hold moslems return to the United States should they leave and has also mused about closing down mosques.

Click to expand...

You are making the same mistake that many never Trump'ers make...And that is you think he should be well versed in DC doublespeak, and politician misdirection because as a political watcher, that is what you expect on this level...But, he isn't, and he seemingly mis speak's often, or says things that are not what he means exactly, or will do the way you, a political detractor lay out....The arguments against Trump by those claiming to be the conscience of the right, are really little more than deflection away from the issues, and akin to MSNBC talking points....This will have lasting repercussions.

j-mac said:

You are making the same mistake that many never Trump'ers make...And that is you think he should be well versed in DC doublespeak, and politician misdirection because as a political watcher, that is what you expect on this level...But, he isn't, and he seemingly mis speak's often, or says things that are not what he means exactly, or will do the way you, a political detractor lay out....The arguments against Trump by those claiming to be the conscience of the right, are really little more than deflection away from the issues, and akin to MSNBC talking points....This will have lasting repercussions.

Click to expand...

I am not a never Trumper. At the same time, I willing to objectively note that Trump has caused a certain amount of his own problems. Though the reports of Trump saying "X" about all moslems were CNN, Trumps handling of Khan's wife after the DNC shows that it is entirely possible that Trump did say "X". Ditto for the "No, I never groped those girls claims".

The term "doublespeak" is passé. Today, the gaze is forensic. We will further investigate the Turkish link to the disappearance of Brittanee Drexel.

'The migrants who returned to Turkey as U.S. citizens were reported to be creating terror and engaging in subversive behaviors. Understandably, the Ottoman government was apprehensive about the status of the new Armenian Americans. As a result, the Porte forbade them to enter Ottoman territories and handed a note to the U.S. embassy claiming that to let Armenians with U.S. passports into Turkey was against the Monroe Doctrine....The American press considered Ottoman authorities in breach of the agreement between the two countries. The New York Tribune, for instance, published on 17 Dec 1893 news of the arrest of Armenian Americans in Turkey and informed readers that if a U.S. citizen committed a crime, he should be handed over to the U.S. embassy for trial. The paper added that Turkey had no right to halt the activities of the missionaries granted in capitulations by the Ottoman gov4ernment.'
(Ipek and Caglayan, The Emigration from the Ottoman Empire, in Turkish Migration to the United States)

We have no problem with msm reifying of Khan. It will look much more absurd when we begin an in-depth, more democratic, comparison. Yes Virginia, Baudrillard was correct, there is such a thing as Democratic leukemia. Even promiscuity. We will critique this example of yellow journalism for Khan with the Chappaqua Blue Racer herself, keeping in mind that Syrian Christians were migrating to the U.S. starting in 1820:

1.) 17 Ap 2009 Obama releases Bush torture memos (Drudge, etc.)

2.) 21 Ap 2009 UK releases 11 Pakistanis thought to be plotting terrorism (Clinton on Pakistan: "A mortal threat from within.") during this time.

3.) 25 Ap 2009 Brittanee Drexel, 17-year-old Turkish DNA disappears at Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Hillary Clinton is airborne to Lebanon.

4.) Hillary Clinton in Lebanon on the fourth anniversary of the (pullout [italics]) of Syrian forces from Lebanon.

5.) 4-5 May 2009 Hillary Clinton meets in Washington with Aliyev and Sarkasian.

The timeliness of this yellow journalism will be applicable to future immigration politics. Here we must, by default, add Anna Mae Pictou-Aquash to this file: similar to Brittanee Drexel, she left Canada, at age seventeen, and went to Boston, "on a dare."

'I also accessed information on the number of men and women born in Turkey across time to clarify the role of women in migration to the United States. Each of the variables utilized here is analyzed for women over the age of seventeen. This criterion on age provides greater comparability across years by accounting for different ages that were asked questions about both education and occupation during successive censuses.'
(Turkish Migration to the United States)