truthatallcost said:
Sen. Ted Cruz called for a “serious criminal investigation” into multiple visits to the White House by Democratic consultant Robert Creamer after undercover videos showed he was involved in hiring protesters to disrupt Donald Trump events.
Mr. Cruz’s comment came after the Daily Caller reported that White that Mr. Creamer has paid 342 visits to the White House, including 47 with Mr. Obama, since 2009.
Mr. Creamer, the husband of Rep. Jan Schakowsky, Illinois Democrat, was sentenced to five months in prison after pleading guilty to tax and banking violations in 2005.
Am I missing something here?
How does paid visits to the WH and fake paid protesters equate to voter fraud?
Now, I've watched the video linked in the OP Washington Times article which folks can watch below. At the 5:36 mark, the individual being interviewed, Scott Foval, states clearly:
The (Clinton) campaigns and DNC cannot go near Priorities (USA), but I guaran-damn-tee you that the people who run the SuperPACs all talk to each other and we and a few other people are the hubs of that communication.
He even elaborates further as that dialog continues. The communications Ms. Foval was referring to, however, were the "dark behind-the-scenes" side of politics that takes place on both sides of the isle whether Democrat or Republican, but in this case he's talking DNC discussions. I get the inference concerning the WH visits - that if this guy has access to the POTUS who is a Democrat and the POTUS is out campaigning for Hillary then he has to know of these under handed tactics. And if he knows, he's sure to tell Hillary. Towhich I say, "Well, maybe...the likelihood of such 'strategic' political ground-game information is shared down stream is very possible. But talking strategy is very different from talking tactics. I don't think this guy would be so stupid as to reveal what ground-game tactics his SuperPAC would employ against a political rival.
Bottom line: Yeah, there are plants at rival campaign rallies - paid agitators. We all know that. This strategy is employed on both sides. What's significant about this video is here we have the head of a liberal SuperPAC admitting to an under investigative reporter that he uses dirty pool on behalf of the DNC and the DNC is surely aware of much of what he and his PAC and some SuperPACs for the Democrat Party are doing.
Disgusting? Absolutely!
But all that notwithstanding, I still fail to see where allegations of voter fraud comes into play here.
BTW, before anyone says it, let's get one thing straight.
These liberal plants at Trump rallies, all they're doing is stoking the flames of hatred that already lay beneath within the hearts of many of Trump's supporters, particularly the White Nationalist types. I don't think these plants are going around calling Trump supporters racist prior to confrontations breaking out. That verbal jousting takes place after the deplorable action has already taken place. But it's the assailants character that resides underneath that comes to the surface when confronted. All the plant did was bring that anger and hatred to the surface which, of course, was the central purpose for the plant being there in the first place...to get under the skin of Trump supporters at their rallies.