• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump refuses to say whether he will accept results of Nov. 8 election

Praxas said:
It's all irrelevant because it is going to be real hard for Trump NOT to accept the results of the election because there is a very good probability he is going to get his ass handed to him via the electoral college.
Click to expand...

yeah, it's not gonna be close at all.
 
trouble13 said:
Yes i get out of it too

People are sayinh dont believe the women accusing trump of assault but believe O'Keefe at the same time

Hypocrissy is everywhere

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

That's a false equivocation though.
Someone claiming something, without evidence and someone providing evidence of something, are two different things.
 
sanman said:
Apparently when Putin paid him a compliment, Trump returned the compliment - thereby magically branding himself as Putin's stooge and Manchurian Candidate for life.

Yet when Trump strongly returned the compliment Hillary gave him at the end of Debate#2, he's still a bloodthirsty Hillary-hater who misogynizes her.
Click to expand...

She dodged the question at the end of that debate, too.
If he had done it, the upsettedness would of been great.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
:doh
Having a person who doesn't want war, conflict, etc, with a nuclear nation, is not the same as being a "Russian puppet."
Click to expand...

He was all for Russia annexing the Crimea, kinda like when he was for the Iraqi War, then he claimed he was not. Tip: If you are a reality show ho, and suck up to the elite media when it suits ya, and that dog turns and bites its master, I call that karma.
 
Paperview said:
Did anyone ask Bush?

No. Because neither candidate even gave hint they would not accept the results of our free and fair elections before a single vote was counted. It is the cornerstone of our democratic republic - the peaceful transition of power for over 200 years is what binds us and keeps us whole.
Click to expand...
That isnt the cornerstone but it has mostly been a nice result of our system. The ability to revolt is the cornerstone. Our bill of rights is our cornerstone. Fairness and equality is a cornerstone.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
Trump is getting hammered for being honest. He should of said yeah he will accept the results of the rigged election but will the voters. That would of really got them woked up, lol.

Imo it really does not matter what the margin of votes are because there is no way to quantify how many votes the media and clinton operatives stole from him.

I am more than livid over the shenanigans going on. I am in favor of investigating everyone in this election cycle and charging all of them with tampering of a us election.



Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Hillary straw mans the WikiLeaks question, and the MSM says little to nothing, the moderator allowing her to get away without any discussion on the subject and the damning revelations of her collusion, corruption, and deceit.

The moderator fails to follow up on Hillary's treatment of women via Bill Clinton, and the media says little to nothing about it.

Yet, the media can't spit out the "won't concede" meme fast enough, or often enough.

The big take away this election cycle is proof of the disintegration of the media and it's embrace of the principles behind state run operations like Pravda.

All voters, regardless of political preference, should see this very dangerous confirmation for what it is, and for what it may indicate in the future.
 
Simpleχity;1066447134 said:
Trump refuses to say whether he will accept results of Nov. 8 election



Even moderator Chris Wallace could not believe what he was hearing from Trump, so he asked Trump again which elicited the same asinine response.

Trump will not commit to accepting the US election results if he should lose.
Click to expand...

I honestly don't really care if he doesn't. He can cry about the results of the election all he likes.
 
yankintx said:
He was all for Russia annexing the Crimea, kinda like when he was for the Iraqi War, then he claimed he was not. Tip: If you are a reality show ho, and suck up to the elite media when it suits ya, and that dog turns and bites its master, I call that karma.
Click to expand...

I heard the tape on the Irag war, to see for myself.
He was asked, his response was "I guess so."

There is a stark difference between a person's opinion on the war and a senator both agitating and voting for said war.
I don't know his position on Crimea, but I'll find out.
 
TheGoverness said:
I honestly don't really care if he doesn't. He can cry about the results of the election all he likes.
Click to expand...

It wouldn't be surprising. It'd actually fit his childish character not to.
 
Paperview said:
Did anyone ask Bush?

No. Because neither candidate even gave hint they would not accept the results of our free and fair elections before a single vote was counted. It is the cornerstone of our democratic republic - the peaceful transition of power for over 200 years is what binds us and keeps us whole.
Click to expand...

I don't think that Bush and Gore had the problems that is being shown in this election. Democrat party rigging their own primary. Hillary's campaign being linked to causing violence at her rivals rallies. Even the FBI's "verdict" of the email scandal is being met by a majority of people as if it was rigged. More **** flinging than I have EVER seen. I thought that Obama's election campaign was full of **** slinging and had never seen an election that was so full of it. And then I see THIS election. And it makes Obama's campaign look like an innocent game of tag with children. (Note: When I say Obama's Campaign I am also referring to those that he ran against...not just Obama.) This election season has truly been more of a bad TV reality show than an actual election.
 
Kal'Stang said:
And I didn't think that the Democrats and liberals could have picked a person that was so corrupt. Guess they can never find a low too low either huh?

*see how that goes?*
Click to expand...

I did enjoy casting my vote for Trump in the TX primary, I was correct that he would be the easiest Rep canidate to beat in the General, thanks Don, for proving me correct yet again. That man should be checked for foot in mouth disease, he is making this so easy.
 
trouble13 said:
Yes i get out of it too

People are sayinh dont believe the women accusing trump of assault but believe O'Keefe at the same time

Hypocrissy is everywhere

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Except of course that O'Keefe's video got people actually fired. That lends a TON of credence to his video...wouldn't you say?
 
It's because he's a brat who's always gotten his own way his entire life. He grew up with a silver spoon in his mouth, dodged the military, and then was left a fortune when his extremely wealthy father died. That's why he's such an arrogant ass.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
That's a false equivocation though.
Someone claiming something, without evidence and someone providing evidence of something, are two different things.
Click to expand...
I disagree. The women have their word and O'Keeffe has his video. Women can lie and so can video. Both should be investigated and authenticated.

If any of them are proved to be liars i would charhe them with tampering. It would srnd an important message to everyone that this kind of stuff is going to ve taken seriously and its not going to be tolerated.

Now if any of them are telling the truth i will celebrate their honesty and thank them for their bravery and patriotism

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Simpleχity;1066447134 said:
Trump refuses to say whether he will accept results of Nov. 8 election

Even moderator Chris Wallace could not believe what he was hearing from Trump, so he asked Trump again which elicited the same asinine response.

Trump will not commit to accepting the US election results if he should lose.
Click to expand...

Let me put it this way...

If you didn't like the fact that the Supreme Court halted the vote count in Florida and determined that George W. Bush won the state and, thus the 2000 presidential election, how the hell can you accept Donald Trump's refusal to accept the potential outcome of this election as it would be determined by the electorate which essentially is the will of the people?

If you believe that our country is a representative republic and your vote was usurped then by the judiciary, how do you accept this slap in the face to democracy?
 
Propate said:
Hello Everybody, I'm Joseph , from Newsody.
I am an intermediate photograph, i made several shots ( Voluntary, paid )
I am also interested in Graphic design and getiing open to other point of views.
Beside photography, i have a Master degree in In International Trade in France.
& Co-Owner of a News agregation website .

I hope i will learn, share, help and have fun among you !

Bonne journée ! have a good day !
This was a quick presentation of me.
Click to expand...

Welcome to DP!

Propate said:
Donald Trump cannot refuse and deny any results, if someone want to be a president or in a position , he should defend it as Hilarry shows and does ( i think).
Click to expand...

Actually, yes, he can. There is no law stating that the loser of an election HAS to concede. It is simply tradition that they do so. Tradition =/= have to.

Propate said:
His communication strategies are making talks . He likes also to make his own rules :D ...newsody.com/news/i-didnt-even-apologise-to-my-wife-donald-trump-dismisses-sex-assault-claims-during-final-debate/590219/
Click to expand...

Your web address is not working. Also, the best way to refer to a website is by linking. Simply type (without the period-->>) [.url]<insert address here[/url] and that way people will be able to simply click on the link and it will take them to the site you want them to see.

Propate said:
Anyways, lately i saw an news article talking about his last trophy : 'I didn't even apologise to my wife': Donald Trump dismisses sex assault claims during final debate . I think expressing things like this way cannot be easily tollerated ...
Click to expand...

He claims he didn't do what is being claimed so why would he apologize to his wife if he didn't do what is being claimed?
 
Brewdog said:
It's because he's a brat who's always gotten his own way his entire life. He grew up with a silver spoon in his mouth, dodged the military, and then was left a fortune when his extremely wealthy father died. That's why he's such an arrogant ass.
Click to expand...

And now the trust fund fratboy is getting his backside handed to him by a woman.

He's a spoiled man-baby who's attempting to take as many people down with him as he can. No one who actually cared about this country could be saying the things he saying about the election being rigged when there's no credible evidence to support it. There's a difference between spinning information and flat out making things up.

Either he doesn't grasp the damage he's doing, which means he isn't fit to be POTUS, or he does grasp what he's doing, which means he isn't fit to be POTUS.

The Turner Diaries dream doesn't die easily for a lot of his followers and all we can do is hope that Trump doesn't inspire them to act.
 
trouble13 said:
I disagree. The women have their word and O'Keeffe has his video. Women can lie and so can video. Both should be investigated and authenticated.

If any of them are proved to be liars i would charhe them with tampering. It would srnd an important message to everyone that this kind of stuff is going to ve taken seriously and its not going to be tolerated.

Now if any of them are telling the truth i will celebrate their honesty and thank them for their bravery and patriotism

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

The videos show these men, who happen to be very highly involved in election activities, admitting to criminal activity.
One so involved that he visits the White House, regularly.
 
ocean515 said:
Hillary straw mans the WikiLeaks question, and the MSM says little to nothing, the moderator allowing her to get away without any discussion on the subject and the damning revelations of her collusion, corruption, and deceit.

The moderator fails to follow up on Hillary's treatment of women via Bill Clinton, and the media says little to nothing about it.

Yet, the media can't spit out the "won't concede" meme fast enough, or often enough.

The big take away this election cycle is proof of the disintegration of the media and it's embrace of the principles behind state run operations like Pravda.

All voters, regardless of political preference, should see this very dangerous confirmation for what it is, and for what it may indicate in the future.
Click to expand...
What you just pointed out is my biggest criticism of wallace.

Trump also gave her cover by talking over her when instead of intetupting he should stood silent waiting for her to answer those charges

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Paperview said:
There are huge differences between the two.
Click to expand...

Yeah, the HUGE difference being that in one case you've got a guy who is saying, "Mehhh... I'm going to keep my options open", and in the other case you've got a guy actually exercising some of those options.

The way the leftist media is handling this you'd think that Trump alluded to nefarious some plan to take the White House by force of arms whether he won the election or not.

This whole thing is stupid, it's nonsense political spin and the sheep are eating it up.

Trump's mistake is that he actually told the truth.

We all know that if there were any means by which any candidate could reasonably contest an election's results they'd do it.

I see many folks bandying around Gore's contention of the 2000 presidential election results as though that's the only time in history it's happened.

It's not.

Just at the federal level the results of 3 presidential elections, roughly two dozen Senatorial elections, and over 500 House elections have been contested after election day.

But folks who are ignorant of those facts (virtually everybody, yourself obviously included) apparently seem to think that contesting the results of a federal election is some unusual and excessively rare event rather than a commonplace part of our electoral process.

Again, Trump's mistake was simply telling the truth where every other politician would have lied, and then gone on to do whatever they were going to do anyhow.

If Trump were a seasoned politician, who had already built a substantial career on lying, gladhanding, and answering questions without ever really giving any kind of answer at all, he probably would have known that he was supposed to lie to the American people and expect them to lap it up like dogs.

And God knows, the CAN'T possibly have a guy who shoots from the hip and actually tells people the truth in the White House.
 
soot said:
And God knows, the CAN'T possibly have a guy who shoots from the hip and actually tells people the truth in the White House.
Click to expand...
But they wouldn't let Gary into the debates, so why even mention him?
 
trouble13 said:
What you just pointed out is my biggest criticism of wallace.

Trump also gave her cover by talking over her when instead of intetupting he should stood silent waiting for her to answer those charges

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I guess it's difficult to keep quiet under the circumstances.

I'm looking for analysis of number of interruptions, speaking time, etc..

I have such total disdain for Hillary I'm sure it clouds my perceptions, but it seemed to me Wallace kept interrupting Trump, while letting Clinton ramble on and on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom