• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jury finds George Zimmerman shooter guilty on all counts

Brewdog said:
The jury seemed to believe it. He had gashes on his head.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I would whack my head against a wall or something a couple times too, if I needed to dodge a murder rap.
 
calamity said:
Yeah, I would whack my head against a wall or something a couple times too, if I needed to dodge a murder rap.
Click to expand...


So you are an unethical liar who would break laws and distort evidence to protect yourself from legal repercussions of your actions. Not sure if you are a hillary supporter but you admit to having the morals of one.
 
jet57 said:
I have every idea what I'm talking about. There were no shots fired until after Zimmerman sped off - right?

And what's the back story on the argument?
Click to expand...

Even if this is true, give Zimmerman a speeding ticket. The other guy decided to try and shoot him. Imagine blaming Zimmerman for speeding for this other man trying to shoot him. Your logic is very flawed.
 
Chillfolks said:
I think Z is a douche, but how is being inside your vehicle on a public road a place he should nit have been
Click to expand...

My thoughts are more along the lines of this guy sure knows how to find trouble or have trouble find him. Just saying.
 
Chillfolks said:
So you are an unethical liar who would break laws and distort evidence to protect yourself from legal repercussions of your actions. Not sure if you are a hillary supporter but you admit to having the morals of one.
Click to expand...

lol...no I would let myself be put away from 25 to life for murder rather than lie. :roll: Are you serious?

I'm sure Z is no fool.
 
Brewdog said:
I know man. This guy needs to play the Florida lotto because he has to be the luckiest dude alive. Whether you agree or disagree about the Travon verdict, this guy is a huge jerk, but he keeps getting out of trouble.
Click to expand...

Karma is just toying with him.

Zimmerman is just like that other poor "innocent" victim OJ Simpson. Both of them got away with something and how are their lives now?
 
Crosscheck said:
Karma is just toying with him.

Zimmerman is just like that other poor "innocent" victim OJ Simpson. Both of them got away with something and how are their lives now?
Click to expand...

And the thing is... I agree with the jury verdict. But the guy is still a huge douche that surely needs his ass kicked daily.
 
Progs here seem to be out to prove what a bunch of jackasses and moral imbeciles they are.

The facts were laid out in court in both cases. Juries decided in favor of Zimmerman in both cases. Eat your hearts out.
 
LowDown said:
Progs here seem to be out to prove what a bunch of jackasses and moral imbeciles they are.

The facts were laid out in court in both cases. Juries decided in favor of Zimmerman in both cases. Eat your hearts out.
Click to expand...

So OJ Simpson is innocent of murder too, right?
 
jet57 said:
So Zimmerman was involved in trying to run away from a guy with a gun...

It's more Zimmerman BS: the man's an idiot; that's the point.
Click to expand...
And of course you are wrong again and even trying to spin a false narrative.
Figures.




Kreton said:
The jury found the irrational person innocent because of a flawed law. What do you mean the jury showed him he couldn't?
Click to expand...

You are again showing that you do not know what you are talking about.
1. What you quoted applied to this case about Apperson, not Zimmerman. So maybe you should read and reply in context.
This Jury showed Apperson he could not get away with breaking the law. Capiche?

2. Since you obviously can not remain on topic and wish to inject the case where Zimmerman was found not guilty - self defense is not a flawed law.




Brewdog said:
I know man. This guy needs to play the Florida lotto because he has to be the luckiest dude alive. Whether you agree or disagree about the Travon verdict, this guy is a huge jerk, but he keeps getting out of trouble.
Click to expand...
You have to be in trouble to get out of it in the first place.
False claims against him to not amount to being in trouble.




jet57 said:
Sorry, but that's the point: Zimmerman is always where he's not supposed to be.
Click to expand...
Holy crap!
Wrong.
That is not a point as this has nothing to do with being in the wrong place. None of the issues surrounding Zimmerman had to do with him being in the wrong place.
This specific case is about an idiot (Apperson) shooting at Zimmerman.




Puigb said:
So OJ Simpson is innocent of murder too, right?
Click to expand...
This isn't about OJ, is it?
 
calamity said:
But...

This Z fellow sure has a way with finding trouble. Usually that does not bode well.
Click to expand...
Which has been the results of those starting trouble for him, nothing else.
Girlfriend's making false claims, the same guy (Apperson) previously starting **** and making false claims, some biker calling him a nigger lover and hitting him.
None of these things would have merited national attention had it not been for him previously having to defend himself from the criminally aggressive Trayvon.


calamity said:
No witnesses ever said this was the case except Zimmerman.
Click to expand...
Wrong.
The witness did say he saw him MMA style on top of Zimmerman, so a witness did.

During trial that witness testified that he saw him on top of Zimmerman but couldn't actually make out what his arms/hands were doing.

That testimony still supports Zimmerman's account.

Just as the young black kid walking his dog supported his account.


calamity said:
Yeah, I would whack my head against a wall or something a couple times too, if I needed to dodge a murder rap.
Click to expand...
:doh
You are making up reasons to not believe what was clearly true.

Zimmerman did not have opportunity to do such.
Or did you forget the witnesses immediately coming to view after the shot or the Officer arriving immediately after the shot?




jaeger19 said:
What I think is interesting here....
Click to expand...
What is interesting about the two dissimilar events?


jaeger19 said:
is that a fellow SHOOTS AT Zimmerman but ends up standing trial.
Click to expand...
And so did Zimmerman stand trial for shooting at Trayvon.
How did that escape your attention?


jaeger19 said:
Zimmerman follows an unarmed kid and ends up in a fight and the unarmed kid ends up dead......
Click to expand...
Your narrative is off.
Zimmerman followed a suspicious person who he had called the police on.
Zimmerman stopped following that suspicious person after the call-taker suggested that they didn't need him to follow and went in a different direction.
While returning to his vehicle from the different direction, Trayvon came out of nowhere (his left rear) and attacked him. Showing the Trayvon either laid in wait (hid) while he passed by the first time or returned. This shows nefarious intent.
 
This piece of **** just won't disappear from the public eye.
 
Excon said:
And of course you are wrong again and even trying to spin a false narrative.
Figures.






You are again showing that you do not know what you are talking about.
1. What you quoted applied to this case about Apperson, not Zimmerman. So maybe you should read and reply in context.
This Jury showed Apperson he could not get away with breaking the law. Capiche?

2. Since you obviously can not remain on topic and wish to inject the case where Zimmerman was found not guilty - self defense is not a flawed law.





You have to be in trouble to get out of it in the first place.
False claims against him to not amount to being in trouble.




Holy crap!
Wrong.
That is not a point as this has nothing to do with being in the wrong place. None of the issues surrounding Zimmerman had to do with him being in the wrong place.
This specific case is about an idiot (Apperson) shooting at Zimmerman.




This isn't about OJ, is it?
Click to expand...

Don't you ever get tired of defending Zimmerman? I mean geez, even your buddies (whom you steal their talking points from) at conservative treehouse don't give a crap about this clown anymore. They are too busy telling everyone how the orange messiah is their great hope to save them from the EVIL socialists out there looking to destroy them.
 
Excon said:
Which has been the results of those starting trouble for him, nothing else.
Girlfriend's making false claims, the same guy (Apperson) previously starting **** and making false claims, some biker calling him a nigger lover and hitting him.
None of these things would have merited national attention had it not been for him previously having to defend himself from the criminally aggressive Trayvon.


Wrong.
The witness did say he saw him MMA style on top of Zimmerman, so a witness did.

During trial that witness testified that he saw him on top of Zimmerman but couldn't actually make out what his arms/hands were doing.

That testimony still supports Zimmerman's account.

Just as the young black kid walking his dog supported his account.


:doh
You are making up reasons to not believe what was clearly true.

Zimmerman did not have opportunity to do such.
Or did you forget the witnesses immediately coming to view after the shot or the Officer arriving immediately after the shot?




What is interesting about the two dissimilar events?


And so did Zimmerman stand trial for shooting at Trayvon.
How did that escape your attention?


Your narrative is off.
Zimmerman followed a suspicious person who he had called the police on.
Zimmerman stopped following that suspicious person after the call-taker suggested that they didn't need him to follow and went in a different direction.
While returning to his vehicle from the different direction, Trayvon came out of nowhere (his left rear) and attacked him. Showing the Trayvon either laid in wait (hid) while he passed by the first time or returned. This shows nefarious intent.
Click to expand...
I'll give that to you. The jury sided with George. So, that's good enough for me. They know more about the case than I do. At the very least, we know the prosecution did not prove Z wasn't defending himself.
 
Puigb said:
Don't you ever get tired of defending Zimmerman? I mean geez, even your buddies (whom you steal their talking points from) at conservative treehouse don't give a crap about this clown anymore. They are too busy telling everyone how the orange messiah is their great hope to save them from the EVIL socialists out there looking to destroy them.
Click to expand...

Thin-skinned, orange messiah.
 
calamity said:
Thin-skinned, orange messiah.
Click to expand...

You gotta love the irony of a website called "conservative treehouse" supporting a big government loving, previously registered three time Democrat like Trump. Conservatives for years complained about the GOP being infested with "RINO's"...and what do they do? They nominate the biggest RINO of them all. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad.
 
calamity said:
I'll give that to you. The jury sided with George. So, that's good enough for me. They know more about the case than I do. At the very least, we know the prosecution did not prove Z wasn't defending himself.
Click to expand...

There was actually one juror who after the trial was going around saying she believed Zimmerman was guilty, but caved in because the others convinced her to.
 
Kreton said:
Gotta love the irony here though. He is guilty because he initiated the confrontation with Zimmerman (sound familiar) and then claimed self defense/syg and justified that he fired because he thought Zimmerman had a gun (sound familiar).
Click to expand...

The lynch mob will not be satisfied as long as Mr. Zimmerman is alive.
 
Puigb said:
There was actually one juror who after the trial was going around saying she believed Zimmerman was guilty, but caved in because the others convinced her to.
Click to expand...

Proving someone was not doing something, like defending himself, is a high bar. It was probably impossible for the prosecution to win that case. She should have held out and at least hung the jury.

I don't think Tray would be dead today if he was white. But, it is what it is.
 
Patrickt said:
The lynch mob will not be satisfied as long as Mr. Zimmerman is alive.
Click to expand...

Dude, Zimmerman is in the news because he wants to be.

Noticed how Casey Anthony has stayed out of the spotlight since her acquittal. Saint Zimmerman should do the same thing, no?
 
calamity said:
Proving someone was not doing something, like defending himself, is a high bar. It was probably impossible for the prosecution to win that case. She should have held out and hung the jury.
Click to expand...


Yeah, I agree. Personally I think a decent case could have been made that Zimmerman was guilty of involuntary manslaughter, but it doesn't matter now. Regardless, I don't buy his story that he was some damsel in distress screaming for help while the big bad black kid beat him to a pulp. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature wouldn't believe that story either, which means your average Trump supporter probably does believe it. In fact, there's probably a correlation between supporting Zimmerman and supporting Trump. Probably the same group of people.
 
jet57 said:
It's more Zimmerman BS: the man's an idiot; that's the point.
Click to expand...

One guy's pushing up daisies because he got pissed off at Zimmerman, while another guy's going to prison because he got pissed off at Zimmerman. For those keeping score, it's 2 to zip Zimmerman. So who's the idiot again?
 
Puigb said:
So OJ Simpson is innocent of murder too, right?
Click to expand...

OJ was an example of jury bias. There's no evidence that undue jury bias had anything to do with the verdicts Zimmerman got.
 
Puigb said:
Yeah, I agree. Personally I think a decent case could have been made that Zimmerman was guilty of involuntary manslaughter, but it doesn't matter now. Regardless, I don't buy his story that he was some damsel in distress screaming for help while the big bad black kid beat him to a pulp. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature wouldn't believe that story either, which means your average Trump supporter probably does believe it. In fact, there's probably a correlation between supporting Zimmerman and supporting Trump. Probably the same group of people.
Click to expand...

If you're going to call other people stupid then you ought to have the intellect to carry it off. When one is ignorant of the facts and can't analyze the facts he has then it doesn't come off well. The appeal to identity politics you make is especially stupid.
 
Puigb said:
Don't you ever get tired of defending Zimmerman? I mean geez, even your buddies (whom you steal their talking points from) at conservative treehouse don't give a crap about this clown anymore. They are too busy telling everyone how the orange messiah is their great hope to save them from the EVIL socialists out there looking to destroy them.
Click to expand...

And here you are posting about Zimmerman. Do you never tire of slandering the poor man? How hateful can you be?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom