Why the need to write a lengthy diatribe of diverse points only to distract from the simple issue? The issue here is about discrimination which you heap upon the Trump camp for its stance against muslim refugee immigrants. I called you out by pointing out that it is islam that viciously attacks and discriminates against infidels, Jews and Christians included. There're many suras in the quran that denigrate and dehumanize infidels as worst of creatures (98:6), vilest of animals (8:55), diseased (2:10), stupid (2:171), deceitful (3:73), losers (7:178), perverse (2:99), perverted transgressors (3:110), unclean (9:28) and comparing unbelievers dogs drooping their tongues out in the sense of worthlessness or that they are like cows but only worst (7:179), etc.
While I could go on and show you the translations of all the above verses, why the need to do that just to clog the thread which bored people to death?
I only need to make it very simple, i.e. to focus on only one verse from among the above to make my point loud and clear. In this case I chose sura 98:6, it alone proves that the allah of islam is a bigot who dehumanizes those who don't believe in him thereby setting up its followers to discriminate against unbelievers, Jews and Christians when it pitted the muslims against the infidels by elevating the muslims as superior class over the perverted infidels", calling the muslims, "Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind" (3:110. 4:141, 48:29).
This is worst than nazism for the nazi ideology does not pretend to have a religious deity hammering them over their heads by some imaginary deity with the choice of fiery hell for not muslim enough or enjoy endless sex with 72 virgins, wines and grapes and what not for obeying command to slaughter infidels for simply being unbelievers, which is the epitome of perversion. Yet, infidels are the perverted ones by allah's standard. Go figure.
You have yet to provide me a link to a quran translation that completely, or in your word, "wildly" interpreted sura 98:6 differently in benign way to that of the translations found in all other accepted quran translations used by islamic religious figures all over the world.
The following link has 53 or more translation of the Arabic quran. Thirty four of them are from the generally accepted translation that includes muslim scholars like Yusuf Ali, Muhammad Asad, Shakir and Pickthall, while the rest consists of less popular or even controversial and newer works. Nevertheless, none has a "wildly" different take on the translation that calls the unbelievers "worst of creatures".
Care to refute all that translation with another of your version of quran translation that says otherwise in a "wildly" direction?
