• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Here is the list of Republicans who pull Trump support, call on him to drop out

To me, the disclosure of Hillary's speeches to Wall Street are more important than the disclosure of some mere jock-talk Trump did on a bus.

The fact that Hillary explicitly said it was better to project one face to the public and another in private, shows her blatantly two-faced nature.
She wants to cut social security - but will Libs hold her accountable on this?
She wants to sign TPP - but will Libs hold her accountable on this?
She's in the hip pocket of big banks - but will Libs hold her accountable on this?

This is why so many Bernie voters refuse to get on the Hillary bandwagon even despite Bernie himself urging them to.

I wonder what Bernie's going to say about these latest disclosures?

The Trump voters seem to be such a clueless lot. Their candidate has a litany of evidence supporting the fact he is ignorant, arrogant, narcissistic, thin-skinned, vindictive, vile, crass, impulsive, misogynistic and grossly inexperienced. Each of these qualities would be a big wart on any candidate, but collectively create a character that should no where near the White House. Any time evidence is put forth highlighting one of Trump's ten deadly sins, the Trump supporter shrugs it off and pivots to something about Hillary.

I get you don't like Hillary.... but, the correct approach to this was to put of a candidate that would be an improvement over Hillary AND could actually beat her. Trump is neither. Let's face it, Republicans, you screwed up: you trusted the wrong guy and now have what you didn't want: President Clinton. Trump can not win solely because of the overabundance of his warts (see above)... there are so many that each example occupies the news cycle and reminds voters just how flawed this guy is.

As to the "two-faces" of politicians, are you really that naive? All politicians have two faces (as do businessmen).... Politics is the art of the possible; its not about having your way. Its about compromise. You have an idea of where you would like things, but in the end, you have to get things done, consistent with your objectives AND consistent with the objectives of your constituency. Your constituency never fully understands an issue or the objections (and power) of the opposition. Your job is to get the best deal you can (which is never what you want) and then sell the result to your constituency that does not fully understand (the proverbial sausage making).

There is no shock in anything in Hillary's e-mails that is even remotely on par with the consistent flow of evidence of just what a wretch of a man Trump is.
 
It is. It's weird they don't make the connection that a billion dollars in revenue from just one year of catastrophic losses means that they have to pick up that slack. They collectively crapped themselves when that solar company cost taxpayers $100 million dollars, but call Trump a genius for costing them a billion.

Four weeks.

Four weeks and this will be over, and the bloated orange gasbag will join Mitt Romney who was thrown to the wolves for being a "loser". But Romney isn't roundly reviled like Trump is going to be. Trump is going to be a joke for the rest of his days.

Declaring a loss on your taxes isn't a Trump thing - that's every single business, company, corporation in America - even private individuals do it on their personal taxes.

Meanwhile Hillary maintains her "private face and public face" - outwardly saying one thing to the people, and privately holding different views - as she's directly told Wall Street. Exactly what good does that do the American public?
 
The Trump voters seem to be such a clueless lot. Their candidate has a litany of evidence supporting the fact he is ignorant, arrogant, narcissistic, thin-skinned, vindictive, vile, crass, impulsive, misogynistic and grossly inexperienced. Each of these qualities would be a big wart on any candidate, but collectively create a character that should no where near the White House. Any time evidence is put forth highlighting one of Trump's ten deadly sins, the Trump supporter shrugs it off and pivots to something about Hillary.

I get you don't like Hillary.... but, the correct approach to this was to put of a candidate that would be an improvement over Hillary AND could actually beat her. Trump is neither. Let's face it, Republicans, you screwed up: you trusted the wrong guy and now have what you didn't want: President Clinton. Trump can not win solely because of the overabundance of his warts (see above)... there are so many that each example occupies the news cycle and reminds voters just how flawed this guy is.

As to the "two-faces" of politicians, are you really that naive? All politicians have two faces (as do businessmen).... Politics is the art of the possible; its not about having your way. Its about compromise. You have an idea of where you would like things, but in the end, you have to get things done, consistent with your objectives AND consistent with the objectives of your constituency. Your constituency never fully understands an issue or the objections (and power) of the opposition. Your job is to get the best deal you can (which is never what you want) and then sell the result to your constituency that does not fully understand (the proverbial sausage making).

There is no shock in anything in Hillary's e-mails that is even remotely on par with the consistent flow of evidence of just what a wretch of a man Trump is.

Rubbish - I get you don't like Trump, but the correct approach is for Democrats to put forth a candidate who's morally better than Trump. Face it, Democrats - you screwed up.
 
Rubbish - I get you don't like Trump, but the correct approach is for Democrats to put forth a candidate who's morally better than Trump. Face it, Democrats - you screwed up.

Perhaps, but the Dems are going to win and the Republicans are going to have to work just to keep themselves as party.... So while neither candidate is very good, one is better than the other. Fortunately for America, the better candidate is going to win, while Trump rides off to Trump Tower, where he will have to work just to put his and tarnished brand back together.
 
Perhaps, but the Dems are going to win and the Republicans are going to have to work just to keep themselves as party.... So while neither candidate is very good, one is better than the other. Fortunately for America, the better candidate is going to win, while Trump rides off to Trump Tower, where he will have to work just to put his and tarnished brand back together.

The problem is that America will go down the tubes under Hillary - and it's all because the Left have successfully partnered with the corporate media. Wall Street and the redistributionist bottom-feeders have joined hands to gang up on the middle class. Sellouts like Shillary are their ugly midwives and offspring both, in this incestuous arrangement.

The American middle class can only take so much - eventually things will reach a point of collapse and no return. Predatory populism will have triumphed over decency and ethics.
 
The problem is that America will go down the tubes under Hillary - and it's all because the Left have successfully partnered with the corporate media. Wall Street and the redistributionist bottom-feeders have joined hands to gang up on the middle class. Sellouts like Shillary are their ugly midwives and offspring both, in this incestuous arrangement.

The American middle class can only take so much - eventually things will reach a point of collapse and no return. Predatory populism will have triumphed over decency and ethics.

Uh-huh.

Are there gonna be death squads too?
 
The problem is that America will go down the tubes under Hillary - and it's all because the Left have successfully partnered with the corporate media. Wall Street and the redistributionist bottom-feeders have joined hands to gang up on the middle class. Sellouts like Shillary are their ugly midwives and offspring both, in this incestuous arrangement.

The American middle class can only take so much - eventually things will reach a point of collapse and no return. Predatory populism will have triumphed over decency and ethics.

America is not going to go down the tubes in 4 years. That is irrational speak. Granted that Clinton does not represent radical change, nor did GW Bush, Clinton I or George I. Things are not suddenly going to go South because you elected Clinton. They were far more likely to go south by electing someone that has no clue what they are doing. (BTW... using Trump and decency in the same argument was an interesting use of oxymorons).

The Cons have four more years to re-group and put forth a good candidate. They have a really good shot of actually winning the White House in 2020. As Trump not capable of doing this job, he was a very bad leader of the "Take Back Washington" movement. If you want this to work, you need a good candidate.

In the interim, marijuana laws are liberalizing. You might like to smoke a bowl.... you will feel much better.
 
America is not going to go down the tubes in 4 years. That is irrational speak. Granted that Clinton does not represent radical change, nor did GW Bush, Clinton I or George I. Things are not suddenly going to go South because you elected Clinton. They were far more likely to go south by electing someone that has no clue what they are doing. (BTW... using Trump and decency in the same argument was an interesting use of oxymorons).

The Cons have four more years to re-group and put forth a good candidate. They have a really good shot of actually winning the White House in 2020. As Trump not capable of doing this job, he was a very bad leader of the "Take Back Washington" movement. If you want this to work, you need a good candidate.

In the interim, marijuana laws are liberalizing. You might like to smoke a bowl.... you will feel much better.

In 4 years, the Left-dominated media will be even more stacked and packed against non-Left candidates. US elections will start to resemble Russian ones - the coverage will be a totally one-sided affair. Under Clinton, expect to see more abuse of Federal power, whether it's investigations of opponents and critics by the IRS and FBI, whether it's judicial appointments with strong Left-wing slants, whether it's open intimidation by street muscle like BlackLivesMatter, whether it's branding any critics as "Russian agents".

That lady has no morals or scruples - she regards the constitution as a speed bump - an inconvenience standing in the way of her getting whatever she wants.
 
In 4 years, the Left-dominated media will be even more stacked and packed against non-Left candidates. US elections will start to resemble Russian ones - the coverage will be a totally one-sided affair. Under Clinton, expect to see more abuse of Federal power, whether it's investigations of opponents and critics by the IRS and FBI, whether it's judicial appointments with strong Left-wing slants, whether it's open intimidation by street muscle like BlackLivesMatter, whether it's branding any critics as "Russian agents".

That lady has no morals or scruples - she regards the constitution as a speed bump - an inconvenience standing in the way of her getting whatever she wants.

Again, without taking issue about Clinton; Trump is not reasonably assured to do better at any of those things. Its moot at this point, because the race is over.
 
Back
Top Bottom