• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

With own marital issues, Trump camp goes all in on Clinton infidelity charges

True, but a man that has seven women saying he raped them is likely a rapist.

Oh, but you should go read the posts about Bill Cosby with 57 accusers and all the posters who defended him.
 
If we use your logic, then yes. Clinton is a rapist and Trump is a paedophile.

Trump has exactly one accuser as far as I know. She was suing for an absurd amount of money, and admitted that she was broke.

Bill Clinton has several, including Juanita Broaddrick who actually worked for him at one point and didn't want her story known initially. She is credible in my estimation.
 
I've been thinking about it and I can't see Trump blurting out something about Bill being a rapist. That pedophile thing surrounding him would immediately come into play. He may say a lot of crap, but that would be the death of him.
 
Good point. So we have a pedophile vs the wife of a rapist. Pretty easy choice.

Hillary was part of the coverup and part of the machine that tried to intimidate the women from not testifying. So your characterization is incorrect.
 
Clinton raped seven women. Why are you defending a rapist?

Rape? Geez...Paula Jone's lawsuit didn't even go that far. Taking everything to the extreme explains why they're called the extreme far right.
 
That seems to be the general consensus, yeah.

by people who have no understanding of tax issues in that environment. AOL which is a big shill for Hill is trying to make something over the fact that the Clintons paid a lot of income tax in 1995 as opposed to Trump taking a big loss to lessen tax liabilities.
 
Hillary was part of the coverup and part of the machine that tried to intimidate the women from not testifying. So your characterization is incorrect.

The National Enquirer isn't a credible source.
 
Rape? Geez...Paula Jone's lawsuit didn't even go that far. Taking everything to the extreme explains why they're called the extreme far right.

its all worthless. Hillary supporters are going to disregard any scandal involving Hillary and her husband just like those voting against her really couldn't give a damn if Trump cheated on various wives, or called some women fat



Its the policies that matter to hard core political junkies not whether the candidate whose policies you approve of (or detest less) has less personal baggage than the other
 
Hillary was part of the coverup and part of the machine that tried to intimidate the women from not testifying. So your characterization is incorrect.
I've read the articles and I don't see any real intimidation, but I'm tempted to give the benefit of the doubt that she did. My view on it has more to do with her obviously being embarrassed on a national stage which explains the insults and desire to cover up the stories. I still don't view her as an evil woman for doing so, but we are just going to disagree on that. The accusations do deserve more attention, but I'm still waiting on them to bring formal charges against him. It's bound to happen.
 
The National Enquirer isn't a credible source.

you must have some familiarity with it-I certainly don't. You deny there was a bimbo eruptions squad in the clinton whitehouse? sure-run with that position
 
Rape? Geez...Paula Jone's lawsuit didn't even go that far. Taking everything to the extreme explains why they're called the extreme far right.

You're saying his victims are all lying?
 
Trump has exactly one accuser as far as I know. She was suing for an absurd amount of money, and admitted that she was broke.

Bill Clinton has several, including Juanita Broaddrick who actually worked for him at one point and didn't want her story known initially. She is credible in my estimation.

Trump has been accused of rape or sexual assault on at least three occasions I can find. I'm not making a claim to the accuracy of the accusations, I'm simply noting they exist and all are unproven in a court of law. If it's ok to ignore "innocent until proven guilty" then it's ok to call Clintom a rapist, and Trump a paedophile.
 
I have trall 40 posts and not one has delt with the issue presented.........

Is there anyone here who is willing to defend Trump for...without evidence.... saying HRC is guilty of adultery and what this accusation has to do with running for the presidency?
 
Trump has been accused of rape or sexual assault on at least three occasions I can find. I'm not making a claim to the accuracy of the accusations, I'm simply noting they exist and all are unproven in a court of law. If it's ok to ignore "innocent until proven guilty" then it's ok to call Clintom a rapist, and Trump a paedophile.

Given the fact that rich men are not subject to the same rule of law that poor men are, we're never going to see either man prosecuted, much less convicted.
So its really a matter of public opinion. People are free to believe whatever they want.

I do find it highly suspect that the one Trump accuser that I'm aware of, waited until April 2016 to file her first lawsuit against Trump, when her lawsuit stated that she was abused 22 years before, way back in 1994.

I'm guessing that someone in either the GOP establishment, or Clinton's camp, was behind this.

She's since filed a request to dismiss her own lawsuit.
 
I have trall 40 posts and not one has delt with the issue presented.........

Is there anyone here who is willing to defend Trump for...without evidence.... saying HRC is guilty of adultery and what this accusation has to do with running for the presidency?

Can anyone recount the Hangman story for us..........
 
you must have some familiarity with it-I certainly don't. You deny there was a bimbo eruptions squad in the clinton whitehouse? sure-run with that position

I find that hard to believe since that's the source of most of your allegations.
 
An accusation of rape is not a conviction of rape.

Especially a 20 year old accusation that was not heard of before he was running for President.
 
Back
Top Bottom