• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Top Clinton aide Cheryl Mills gets immunity in FBI investigation of email server

ThoughtEx. said:
If i did would they magically change your mind? If I PROVIDED you a video link of trump saying he would run for pres as republican, because republicans are dumb and controllable, who believe anything long as you play on their fears and racism. Would that change your mind.

I dont think it will, you lot are ripe with us vs them, and would elect hitler himself before admitting your own ignorance.
Click to expand...

Is that a white flag? I think that is a white flag. That even looks like a white flag.

:surrender:surrender:surrender

Yep, that's a white flag.
 
apdst said:
You must also believe that Indians who are American citizens should be able to cross into Mexico at will.
Click to expand...

Well, im def not going to get into the rights of natives here with you. But i believe all citizens of canada, us, and mexico should be able to cross borders freely. I believe this for both humane and economic reasons.
 
NonoBadDog said:
Is that a white flag? I think that is a white flag. That even looks like a white flag.

:surrender:surrender:surrender

Yep, that's a white flag.
Click to expand...

Please, i have neither the time or the patience to convey the basic foundation of knowledge needed for him to even understand the similarity of Trumps campain, and Hitlers propaganda. And basically, anytime anyone says , give me an example. They are saying do my opposition research for me so I Can put forth some ignorance with minimal effort.

If you think thats surrendar, you're not very good at debating
 
Erod said:
Why would she need immunity?
Click to expand...

Because all of Clinton aides were in cohorts with her in sending classified data.
Not just emails but faxes as well when Clinton did want to wait for a secure line or a secure tag for the fax.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Hmm, why is it ridiculous?

And most mexicans are descended from natives, not like the incas and aztecs just poofed out overnight. So in my book they have a moral right to find work anywhere on this continent, especially since its our screwing their economy with corporate welfare thats driving them here in first place.
Click to expand...

This has nothing to do with what he posted. People crossing the border without permission
Are criminals under the law.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Well, im def not going to get into the rights of natives here with you. But i believe all citizens of canada, us, and mexico should be able to cross borders freely. I believe this for both humane and economic reasons.
Click to expand...

Don't want to talk about it, now...lol

What economic reasons?
 
ludin said:
This has nothing to do with what he posted. People crossing the border without permission
Are criminals under the law.
Click to expand...

Third person to come out with this line, refer back to my post about why they are illegal. Comment on that, instead of giving me some tired drivel. I have no regard for immoral laws. And looking at the standards of immigration for mexicans compared to that of canadians, factored in with our aggressive economic practices, its an immoral law set of laws in my book.

And yes, i habitually break laws i dont agree with on a daily basis. With glee.
 
apdst said:
Don't want to talk about it, now...lol

What economic reasons?
Click to expand...

Im sorry do I have a sign that says, willing to teach you basic concepts you should have learned in school. Capitalism, operates under a set of principles, one of those being you need to expand your markets, and let people earn enough money to buy your products. China is fastly becoming the world top producer of cheap stuff. Basically stealing our money, when we could open up borders and develop capital in mexico to compete.

If you want more information try reading the wealth of nations...
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Im sorry do I have a sign that says, willing to teach you basic concepts you should have learned in school. Capitalism, operates under a set of principles, one of those being you need to expand your markets, and let people earn enough money to buy your products. China is fastly becoming the world top producer of cheap stuff. Basically stealing our money, when we could open up borders and develop capital in mexico to compete.

If you want more information try reading the wealth of nations...
Click to expand...

You're so uninformed that you refuse to discuss it. Why do Liberals always do that?...lol
 
apdst said:
You're so uninformed that you refuse to discuss it. Why do Liberals always do that?...lol
Click to expand...

Discuss? You are basically waiting for me to say something then asking an open ended question on a subjective viewpoint to force me into a he said she said. Its what a salesman would call predatory tactics meant to cast doubt. So they likely dont respond to your bs because they arent dumb enough to argue semantics with someone unwilling to concede any point under any circumstance.

And im not a liberal.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Discuss? You are basically waiting for me to say something then asking an open ended question on a subjective viewpoint to force me into a he said she said. Its what a salesman would call predatory tactics meant to cast doubt. So they likely dont respond to your bs because they arent dumb enough to argue semantics with someone unwilling to concede any point under any circumstance.

And im not a liberal.
Click to expand...

Sure you're not...lol
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Third person to come out with this line, refer back to my post about why they are illegal. Comment on that, instead of giving me some tired drivel. I have no regard for immoral laws. And looking at the standards of immigration for mexicans compared to that of canadians, factored in with our aggressive economic practices, its an immoral law set of laws in my book.

And yes, i habitually break laws i dont agree with on a daily basis. With glee.
Click to expand...

That must be very exciting for you.

Put simply, those who cross illegally do so because they are breaking American law. Your lack of regard for laws is irrelevant. Don't believe me? Don't pay your federal income tax.
 
Meanwhile, back in the general vicinity of the topic, does anybody know why Obama used a pseudonym when communicating with Clinton via e-mail?
 
nota bene said:
That must be very exciting for you.

Put simply, those who cross illegally do so because they are breaking American law. Your lack of regard for laws is irrelevant. Don't believe me? Don't pay your federal income tax.
Click to expand...

Oh nice little twist away of his blatant racism and my questioning the laws themselves. I will continue to pay taxes, because i agree i and everyone else should. And also think i should pay more. And our country was founded in rebellion of oppressionist laws meant to keep a class of people economically lower. Which is what our current immigration laws are doing. So, it is relevant.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Third person to come out with this line, refer back to my post about why they are illegal. Comment on that, instead of giving me some tired drivel. I have no regard for immoral laws. And looking at the standards of immigration for mexicans compared to that of canadians, factored in with our aggressive economic practices, its an immoral law set of laws in my book.

And yes, i habitually break laws i dont agree with on a daily basis. With glee.
Click to expand...

they are the same standards. Now if you want to talk about Canadian immigration laws they are very very strict on who they allow in. As a sovereign nation we have stated that in order to enter this country you need permission.

If you do not have permission then you are in fact breaking the law and therefore a criminal.
It doesn't matter if you are coming north, south, east, or west.

You might want to do some research on the subject before you call other people's responses drivel because it seems that you are
Not that educated on our immigration laws.

You opinion of what the laws are is irrelevant.

They have the same immigration laws. They apply to both equally.
Your opinion is meaningless.

Eventually you will get caught and suffer he consequences for your actions.
I doubt you will be so gleeful then.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Oh nice little twist away of his blatant racism and my questioning the laws themselves. I will continue to pay taxes, because i agree i and everyone else should. And also think i should pay more. And our country was founded in rebellion of oppressionist laws meant to keep a class of people economically lower. Which is what our current immigration laws are doing. So, it is relevant.
Click to expand...

Not really since well those class of people do not belong here in the US.
they do not oppress anyone. Pretty much every sovereign country in the world has immigration laws.

Mexico has some very very tough immigration laws and they fully enforce them when it comes to people sneaking into their country.

Yes it very much is irrelevant.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
She was a Witness, who also acted as a lawyer, when it is barred per State Department ethics rules.
Sorry, this whole thing stinks of bull****.
Click to expand...

The FBI reports that Clinton's lawyers are Heather Samuelson and David Kendall, a partner at the law firm, Williams & Connolly LLP.

Cheryl Mills is Clinton's aide....and I think it's her laptop from 2014 that was given immunity....not the statements she made to the FBI.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
Well there is new evidence, that shows intent.
So, it's kinda important.
Click to expand...


Mills used the laptop to sort through and separate Clinton's emails so she could comply with the State Department's request. So the only intent here was to follow the law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom