• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton was poisoned by Putin or Trump, Washington Post said...

H

hzdl

New member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Location
Hanoi
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
hzdl said:
This is just hilarious. :lol:

Conspiracy theories work in this way when it comes to knock these 2 guys when their backs are turned. Now Washington Post is quoting Bennet Omalu, the forensic pathologist who said on his twitter account.

The Washington Post reports that Hillary Clinton was poisoned by Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump
Click to expand...

Holy ****ing dishonesty! The Washington Post reported on some one suggesting that Putin may have had Clinton poisoned. At no point did they say Putin did it, or that she was poisoned. Why the need to lie?
 
Redress said:
Holy ****ing dishonesty! The Washington Post reported on some one suggesting that Putin may have had Clinton poisoned. At no point did they say Putin did it, or that she was poisoned. Why the need to lie?
Click to expand...

Man... The fact that the WP "reported" this should make your mind blowing. Imagine the inverted story that would involve Clinton....

This isn't dishonesty. I just wanted to point mainstream media is now building conspiracy theories which normally are always mocked at by them.
 
hzdl said:
Man... The fact that the WP "reported" this should make your mind blowing. Imagine the inverted story that would involve Clinton....

This isn't dishonesty. I just wanted to point mainstream media is now building conspiracy theories which normally are always mocked at by them.
Click to expand...

All the WaPo did was report that this guy (who has been in the news recently) said something. Did the WaPo claim that the Russians poisoned Clinton? No, they did not. In fact, the WaPo came right out and said that people find this guy's idea to be loony.

BTW, pimping some assy dishonest blog does not belong in the Mainstream Media forum.
 
hzdl said:
Man... The fact that the WP "reported" this should make your mind blowing. Imagine the inverted story that would involve Clinton....

This isn't dishonesty. I just wanted to point mainstream media is now building conspiracy theories which normally are always mocked at by them.
Click to expand...

What, you mean like all the nonsense that people say about her that they do report on?
 
Kobie said:
All the WaPo did was report that this guy (who has been in the news recently) said something. Did the WaPo claim that the Russians poisoned Clinton? No, they did not. In fact, the WaPo came right out and said that people find this guy's idea to be loony.

BTW, pimping some assy dishonest blog does not belong in the Mainstream Media forum.
Click to expand...

Which is why the WaPo should have never run the story in the first place.
 
Crovax said:
Which is why the WaPo should have never run the story in the first place.
Click to expand...

It's clickbait, I'll grant that. However, that doesn't take away from the dishonest nature of the blog post that someone decided qualified as "mainstream media."
 
well putin would rather trump wins clearly (they have a lot in common), but she would be way sicker if this were true
 
Are we talking about the second source or the primary source here which is the WaPo?

The WaPo decided to run this story because of clickbait goal, fine, you know people are lazy ass and a significant part just reads titles. I'm sorry but this is not dishonesty, there is a strategy behind this article and we all know how the mainstream media behaves towards Trump and Putin.

edit: and if you prefer, I still can change the title in " may be poisoned"
 
Last edited:
Crovax said:
Which is why the WaPo should have never run the story in the first place.
Click to expand...

If news sites could not run stories without a grounding in facts, they would have very little to run. Somehow, it turns out that people are interested in what famous people have to say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom