- Joined
- Jun 24, 2016
- Messages
- 2,417
- Reaction score
- 688
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
I don't want them released. He doesn't redact anything.
I don't want them released. He doesn't redact anything.
Everyone thinks that Trump will do well in the debates, everyone thinks he will have a Ronald Reagan moment during them. Though I haven't seen this capacity from him, he's either absent from them or rather mellow. Hillary's people are going on the offensive for the first time in the debates. They are training her to attack, attack, attack and to get under his skin. If the Benghazi hearings prove anything, it's Hillary knows how to debate, hold her ground, and act dumb. I mean she outsmarted EVERY house Republican AND for all intents and purposes, the FBI! If Hillary catches Trump in just one of his Emotional conspiracy-like tirades. I consider it game over for Trump.
There is a fundamental ethical difference between offering a bribe and accepting one. In the first case, it is effectively just another fee to grease the wheels of business. Hell, give it a name like "Government access surcharge", put it on a form, and the BG proponents would be all over it. In the second case, soliciting/accepting a bribe, that's abusing one's power and possibly oath for self-enrichment. Following the money trail for the Clinton Foundation/State Department/TPP lobbiests leaves little doubt HRC leveraged her position as SoS to enrich the organization that bears her name.And right on cure we have the bribery of the Florida Attorney General by Trump with him on tape bragging about being ablate buy influence and how those who are bribed then kiss his ass.
He makes so called "Crooked Hillary" look like a virginal school girl in a Catholic nunnery by comparison to his craven corruption.
Chuck Todd says the CNN poll is flawed
MSNBC unskews CNN poll that showed Trump ahead - POLITICO
It makes sense.
There is a fundamental ethical difference between offering a bribe and accepting one. In the first case, it is effectively just another fee to grease the wheels of business. Hell, give it a name like "Government access surcharge", put it on a form, and the BG proponents would be all over it. In the second case, soliciting/accepting a bribe, that's abusing one's power and possibly oath for self-enrichment. Following the money trail for the Clinton Foundation/State Department/TPP lobbiests leaves little doubt HRC leveraged her position as SoS to enrich the organization that bears her name.
Don't forget about any national secrets that Trump can get the Russians to steal. :mrgreen:
Trump will be along shortly to derail his own campaign. It's no big deal.
Yesterdays, C-i-C forum was telling. The Donald gave nothing but short answers of little substance. When he did try to elaborate, he said very stupid things such including lauding Putin, telling us our generals are worthless and suggesting we had a right to Iraq's oil as a spoil of war....
Everybody would be laughing so hard, nobody would notice. Can you see her beady little eyes now, darting back and forth, up and down. Grand Mal seizure for sure.
You would laugh at a older woman having a seizure?
You just heard what you wanted to hear. Trump said that the 0 administration had reduced our generals to rubble by the way 0 fired the ones that opposed his failed agenda. As for Putin; he is clearly kicking 0's skinny ass.
It is no different than the john who screws the whore. Both are guilty.
Yes, you just heard what you wanted to hear. Those were not the words of a US President. They were the words of a an ignorant thug masquerading as a Presidential candidate.
In fact, his entire candidacy is about telling the uneducated angry white male what he wants to hear. If those people actually held him to a standard of "how" and "why", they would never vote for this charlatan. But, they don't want to know "how" and "why".... they just want to listen to the political porn this reality TV host is espousing.
No, not really: those providing a service are more culpable, both legally and ethically, than those seeking a service.
I don't know I was hoping it was sarcasm vs you bring a horrible human
Live The Dream, Higgins, my Man. Indulge yourself. Please, no, PLEASE think of me as a HORRIBLE PERSON.
None of my dreams involve an elderly women having a fit, but whatever floats your boat.
Higgins, my Man, I couldn't care less if your dreams involve an ugly, old woman having a seizure. I want for YOU to think of ME as a HORRIBLE HUMAN. TTFN.
the irony of this statement is lost somewhere.
... its hard to have "lost" something that never existed.