All apologies Mason. My post apparently went right over your head. I could probably use some communication skill .101 classes. Or, perhaps I misunderstood your post altogether.
Please let me try again. I will type slower this time.
You posted:
I was sort of agreeing with you but in a different light.
People want to defend Trump because his brand on a University or a Vodka bottle doesn't necessarily hold him accountable for the product in and of itself. Can we agree on that? Have we not both read posts here that clearly state that opinion?
Well, if that's so, and Trump has no accountability over the ventures that fly his banner, is that what we will accept as a P.O.T.U.S? A brand name? No accountability? No relative content to Trump, other than buying a label?
We hear Trump himself say that "he" never went bankrupt, only his business ventures did. As others were left holding the bag, Trump being the Gypsie in the palace that he is, made out like a, well, Gypsie in a palace. He's a ****ing punk.
He has ruined people's lives and crushed REAL people's dreams. It's all there in black and white for anyone interested on educating their selves on it. Hell, he don't even deny it. He hides behind the rules of the game and uses it for his defense but his lack of personal character and contempt for anyone other than himself shines through like the sun after an April shower.
And his supporters simply do not care. Hell, some applaud him for it.
