• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Newly released Clinton emails show favors for foundation donors

The IG report makes clear there is no comparison between Clinton’s and Powell’s email practices. Powell did use personal email for some official business, but not nearly to the extent Clinton did nor did he use a private server. Although a handful of Powell’s emails were found to be classified
...

Posting continual links from Trumpbart just shows your hack nack.

Stop doing that, and you may be taken seriously.

In direct conflict with your post, the OIG report said Powell used his AOL account for personal and official State business exclusively.

They both used the classified system for classified, and they both used the non-government addresses for the unclassed material. Exclusively.

Read it, damn it.
 
The real scary part is that liberals/dems don't have the integrity, character to care. Nor are they smart enough to understand the danger to this country from without and within because of the blatant Oligarchy. The country of serfs.
 
You have no evidence.

Just like all the other 14000 faux Clinton "scandals" that never went anywhere.

Cons for the last 30 years: Any day now...any day now.

*yawn*

She said she turned over all work related emails - here is evidence that she did not. She said there was no interaction between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department. Here is evidence that she lied about that as well - an intentional infraction of the law. Also, the evidence is mounting that those that paid large sums if money to the Clinton Foundation were afforded unique access to the Secretary of State - Pay-to-Play.

Evidence? Lots of evidence abounds. You just have to be honest enough with yourself to comprehend what's happening here.
 
It's you who seems to be troubled by a lack of comprehension.

You seem to be conflating two separate groups of emails.

Why are you fighting so hard to act as if the truth is not the truth and the facts do not exist, and utilizing the weakest possible positions to do so? It's sad to watch it happen.
 
If the media did its job, people would realize that the Clinton foundation does a world of good, donations to charities in order to fight the spread of HIV/AIDs, and that there is nothing sinister going on.

A world of good huh? Of the hundreds of millions they received, only 10 to 15 percent of it actually went to to charities, while the other 85 to 90 percent went into their pockets, and the pockets of their minions.

Nothing sinister at all... lmmfao

.
 
A world of good huh? Of the hundreds of millions they received, only 10 to 15 percent of it actually went to to charities, while the other 85 to 90 percent went into their pockets, and the pockets of their minions.

Nothing sinister at all... lmmfao

.

Got any evidence of this? Links or so from official sources? Quite interested here, since I am in general anti-Charity... I think they all are scams.
 
Got any evidence of this? Links or so from official sources? Quite interested here, since I am in general anti-Charity... I think they all are scams.

There $50million cash reserve should be the first clue.
 
It is amazing to me that this investigation has taken so long.
Its the same story regarding the Benghazi hearings. She lies, stonewalls, avoids, gets called back, lies more, offers more lies, has more info inadvertently revealed, lies some more, and her supporters shriek about how long this is taking. Its like "she already gave you a new pack of lies 3 times...why do you keep calling her back for more lies?"
 
Would you like to provide any proof of such an interesting accusation?

Seriously?

After all this? You pretend like you know what you're talking about, but didn't know Colin Powell did not preserve a single email as he was required to, by law?

You call it an interesting accusation?

How could you have gone this long discussing this year and a half old story and *not* know?

Powell says he doesn't have any of his State emails - POLITICO
[h=1]Powell says he doesn't have any of his State emails[/h] 03/08/15

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell says he doesn’t have any emails to turn over to the State Department.

Appearing on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday, Powell responded to revelations that he used a personal email account, rather than a government one, when he was in charge of the State Department. Questions about his email use arose last week when it was disclosed that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a personal email account during her tenure.

“I don’t have any to turn over. I did not keep a cache of them. I did not print them off. I do not have thousands of pages somewhere in my personal files,” Powell said.

 
A world of good huh? Of the hundreds of millions they received, only 10 to 15 percent of it actually went to to charities, while the other 85 to 90 percent went into their pockets, and the pockets of their minions.

Nothing sinister at all... lmmfao

.

^ Heaping mound of Bull ****.
 
Got any evidence of this? Links or so from official sources? Quite interested here, since I am in general anti-Charity... I think they all are scams.

No, he doesn't, unless it's from the lying CEC cono-sphere.

Lets ask the people who professionally check out charities :

https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation

1271 Avenue of the Americas
42nd Floor
New York, NY 10020
www.clintonfoundation.org
Tax Status: 501(c)3 [h=2]Other Names[/h] Clinton Foundation
Clinton Global Initiative
Clinton Health Access Initiative
William J. Clinton Foundation



RATING: A



[h=2]Stated Mission[/h]Works to improve global health & wellness, increase opportunity for women & girls, reduce childhood obesity, create economic opportunity & growth, and help communities address the effects of climate change.

Program Percentage : 88 %

Program %Overhead %
12%

Cost to Raise $100 : $ 2
 
No, he doesn't, unless it's from the lying CEC cono-sphere.

Lets ask the people who professionally check out charities :

https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation

1271 Avenue of the Americas
42nd Floor
New York, NY 10020
www.clintonfoundation.org
Tax Status: 501(c)3 [h=2]Other Names[/h] Clinton Foundation
Clinton Global Initiative
Clinton Health Access Initiative
William J. Clinton Foundation



RATING: A



[h=2]Stated Mission[/h]Works to improve global health & wellness, increase opportunity for women & girls, reduce childhood obesity, create economic opportunity & growth, and help communities address the effects of climate change.

Program Percentage : 88 %

Program %Overhead %
12%

Cost to Raise $100 : $ 2

Lol.....
DOJ Declined FBI Request To Investigate Clinton Foundation | The Daily Caller
 
Just as I predicted...from the lying CEC cono-sphere

You really think tossing out the rubbish from Tucker Carlson's rag counters?

Yeah, LOL.

LOL

Please post your evidence the FBI did not ask the DOJ to investigate the Clinton Foundation.
 
Its the same story regarding the Benghazi hearings. She lies, stonewalls, avoids, gets called back, lies more, offers more lies, has more info inadvertently revealed, lies some more, and her supporters shriek about how long this is taking. Its like "she already gave you a new pack of lies 3 times...why do you keep calling her back for more lies?"

It got Bill Clinton impeached. Maybe it'keep his bride out of the White House. If not...too bad for us.
 
What's amazing to me are two things, 1) there has been no independent prosecutor appointed, and 2) that the evidence has not even been put before a Grand Jury to determine if charges should even be brought, which would have already happened (IMHO) if an independent prosecutor had been in charge of the investigation.

Why is that amazing? This is politics not justice.
 
Actual evidence will be needed, not cherry picking documents via judicial watch

:doh

Documents that show pay for play occurring are evidence. That they have to be pulled from a pile of other documents isn't cherry-picking; it's discovery.
 
If the media would do their job and inform the American people of the truth, without equivocation or hyperbolic distractions, then yes, I truly believe that the great majority of the American people would more than just care deeply, but demand action be taken.

:( You have more faith in us than I do. Americans (I think) are too partisan/tribal. If the media did their job, then Clinton supporters would simply claim that the media were in an alliance against her.
 
These would be emails the FBI said she deleted, and they recovered, which it may surprise you to know, and as FBI Comey said, people do delete things in their email in box as a matter of course. Surprise!

:) Actually those would be the ones they tried to delete from the server, not the inbox. ;)
 
What's amazing to me are two things, 1) there has been no independent prosecutor appointed, and 2) that the evidence has not even been put before a Grand Jury to determine if charges should even be brought, which would have already happened (IMHO) if an independent prosecutor had been in charge of the investigation.

The powers that be do not want to convict her. That is why you have the fox watching the hen house. Plus replacing her as their puppet could prove impossible. Finding someone as politically correct and corrupt is no easy task. She is clearly one of the best in the world.
 
Just as I predicted...from the lying CEC cono-sphere

You really think tossing out the rubbish from Tucker Carlson's rag counters?

Yeah, LOL.

Attack the source ? Yea thats pretty weak and its just as I predicted
 
The thing that sucks about this the most, is that the alternative to the lying, criminal, Clinton is Donald Trump. Imagine if even a moderate won the nomination instead. Clinton would be down by 15-20 points at this point.

So we have a choice between 2 party puppets. That is not change. That is more of the illusion of choice we have been taught to cherish by the rich and powerful who own both parties.
 
No, he doesn't, unless it's from the lying CEC cono-sphere.

Lets ask the people who professionally check out charities :

https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation

1271 Avenue of the Americas
42nd Floor
New York, NY 10020
www.clintonfoundation.org
Tax Status: 501(c)3 [h=2]Other Names[/h] Clinton Foundation
Clinton Global Initiative
Clinton Health Access Initiative
William J. Clinton Foundation



RATING: A



[h=2]Stated Mission[/h]Works to improve global health & wellness, increase opportunity for women & girls, reduce childhood obesity, create economic opportunity & growth, and help communities address the effects of climate change.

Program Percentage : 88 %

Program %Overhead %
12%

Cost to Raise $100 : $ 2

Thank you, so it is the usual right wing lies.
 
Back
Top Bottom