• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Transgender Bathroom Access to Extend to All Federal Buildings[W:197]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Transgender Bathroom Access to Extend to All Federal Buildings

PerfectStorm said:
The OP has a link to a story regarding this Texas ruling.
Click to expand...

No I don't my link is about federal buildings extension.
First link is the main story then the second link is a local link about my home.

The school issue is handled in other threads and like the poster said the challenges to them aren't new. federal buildings aren't affected by this.
 
Re: Transgender Bathroom Access to Extend to All Federal Buildings

AGENT J said:
No I don't my link is about federal buildings extension.
First link is the main story then the second link is a local link about my home.

The school issue is handled in other threads and like the poster said the challenges to them aren't new. federal buildings aren't affected by this.
Click to expand...

Not your backup link in the OP, an embedded link in your first link in the OP....


Texas, Other States to Ask Judge to Halt Obama'''s Transgender Bathroom Policy - NBC News
 
Re: Transgender Bathroom Access to Extend to All Federal Buildings

fmw said:
No but it makes sense to pass anti discrimination laws for characteristics that are not optional for the individual involved. Optional characteristics shouldn't be protected simply because they are chosen, not inherited.
Click to expand...

So, religion shouldn't be protected since it is chosen?
 
Re: Transgender Bathroom Access to Extend to All Federal Buildings

PerfectStorm said:
Not your backup link in the OP, an embedded link in your first link in the OP....


Texas, Other States to Ask Judge to Halt Obama'''s Transgender Bathroom Policy - NBC News
Click to expand...

LMAO an embedded link? would you like to talk about what causes hiccups? there's a link to that i see too on that page.;)
Like i said the OP is about the federal extension, the school issue is not this topic nor does it impact it.
 
Re: Transgender Bathroom Access to Extend to All Federal Buildings

Scrabaholic said:
So, religion shouldn't be protected since it is chosen?
Click to expand...

Yes but it is protected from government intervention in the constitution. It should not be protected when government is not involved.
 
It kills me when people who lie and oppress the LGBTQ community try to act like they are defending them. But they only spread lies about them.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Henrin said:
Ummm...what? A MTF is still biologically male, while a FTM is still biologically female. Transgenders do not actually change their sex. If they wanted to change the policy based on some rejection of discrimination they should have done it in a way that stands up to scientific evaluation. As it stands this just ends up looking ignorant because the government ignored science to apply it under sex.
Click to expand...

Let's see if I can explain this to a conservative. Since you want to talk about science let's talk science. Biologically speaking males and females have the same process for excavating waste so there is no biological reason for separating our restrooms. Nevertheless we do and if the reason isn't biological then the next obvious reason is that we do so for sociological reasons. Sociology isn't the domain of sex, it's the domain of gender, which is why arguing for restroom divisions to be based on sex are so specious. If biology was your concern then you'd be arguing for unisex restrooms since biologically speaking there are no need for separate facilities.
 
ecofarm said:
Henrin does not represent conservatives. He was banned long ago and it was celebrated by all.
Click to expand...

It was the on the first page. Didn't read much further than that but his argument doesnt seem all that dissimilar from the conservative one.
 
Master Debator said:
It was the on the first page. Didn't read much further than that but his argument doesnt seem all that dissimilar from the conservative one.
Click to expand...

It might be similar, but he was no conservative. Easily a top ten most despised member ever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom