• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Congressman Asks Obama to Keep Classified Intel from Trump

sanman

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Messages
12,016
Reaction score
4,649
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Some retard representing Rhode Island is claiming that Hillary's email scandal -- wait for it -- makes Trump a threat to national security

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...24ced4-547a-11e6-b652-315ae5d4d4dd_story.html


So basically the Democrat tactic here is to whimsically threaten the same punishments for others that were being threatened against them -- even if the other side hasn't done any of those same things.


At this point, it would be highly appropriate to call for a Civil War.
Why? Because the ruthless Democrats, in the interest of not losing, would quickly start embracing guns up to their eyeballs. Such is their hypocrisy

F*** this sh!t - debate is wasted on people like these - at this point, Democrats are only good for fertilizer.
 
Civil war because a civilian doesn't get national security briefings.

Right.
 
Civil war because a civilian doesn't get national security briefings.

Right.

If the civilian Hillary, who has a history of mishandling classified information ,is getting a briefing then the civilian Donald should also.
 
Some retard representing Rhode Island is claiming that Hillary's email scandal -- wait for it -- makes Trump a threat to national security

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...24ced4-547a-11e6-b652-315ae5d4d4dd_story.html


So basically the Democrat tactic here is to whimsically threaten the same punishments for others that were being threatened against them -- even if the other side hasn't done any of those same things.


At this point, it would be highly appropriate to call for a Civil War.
Why? Because the ruthless Democrats, in the interest of not losing, would quickly start embracing guns up to their eyeballs. Such is their hypocrisy

F*** this sh!t - debate is wasted on people like these - at this point, Democrats are only good for fertilizer.

Cicilline says Trump’s “call for hostile foreign action” goes beyond partisan politics and “represents a threat to the republic itself.”

Can these assholes be any more hyperbolic and dramatic?
 
The parade of dumb@ssery continues - Democrat Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid says that Trump should be given "fake intelligence briefings because he's too dangerous" to be given real info:

Harry Reid: Trump should receive 'fake' intelligence briefings - Business Insider


As we can see, the partisan Left are totally exceeding all boundaries and norms of coexistence. Debate with such people is fruitless and a wasted effort.
 
The parade of dumb@ssery continues - Democrat Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid says that Trump should be given "fake intelligence briefings because he's too dangerous" to be given real info:

Harry Reid: Trump should receive 'fake' intelligence briefings - Business Insider


As we can see, the partisan Left are totally exceeding all boundaries and norms of coexistence. Debate with such people is fruitless and a wasted effort.

Reid needs to check into the Old Folks Home.
 
If the civilian Hillary, who has a history of mishandling classified information ,is getting a briefing then the civilian Donald should also.

So, you're going to start that civil war then?
 
Cicilline says Trump’s “call for hostile foreign action” goes beyond partisan politics and “represents a threat to the republic itself.”

Can these assholes be any more hyperbolic and dramatic?

Sadly, yes. Just give 'em another week of lagging poll numbers. Then Melania will turn into a Russian agent who's the conduit between Trump and Putin.
 
I suppose you were outraged at this as well, right?

"Given the FBI's findings, denying Clinton access to classified information certainly constitutes appropriate sanctions," Ryan (House Speaker Paul) wrote. "There is no legal requirement for you to provide Secretary Clinton with classified information, and it would send the wrong signal to all those charged with safeguarding our nation's secrets if you choose to provide her access to this information despite the FBI's findings."
[...]
And Sens. Cory Gardner of Colorado and Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn of Texas introduced a bill Thursday that would revoke the security clearance of Clinton and her aides at State who sent classified information through her personal servers.


Ryan to feds: Clinton shouldn't get classified briefings as nominee - POLITICO

What was that you called people advocating this? Oh right...retard and dumbasses. Sounds about right.
 
Some retard representing Rhode Island is claiming that Hillary's email scandal -- wait for it -- makes Trump a threat to national security

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...24ced4-547a-11e6-b652-315ae5d4d4dd_story.html


So basically the Democrat tactic here is to whimsically threaten the same punishments for others that were being threatened against them -- even if the other side hasn't done any of those same things.


At this point, it would be highly appropriate to call for a Civil War.
Why? Because the ruthless Democrats, in the interest of not losing, would quickly start embracing guns up to their eyeballs. Such is their hypocrisy

F*** this sh!t - debate is wasted on people like these - at this point, Democrats are only good for fertilizer.

They're having a horrible convention. Obama's speech didn't register one iota in the polls. They know what they have to sit through tonight, when they have to hear the shrill and complete lack of charisma spew from the podium. Meanwhile, there's been a 10 point swing in the polls, Wasserman got fired, Bernie's supporters are still protesting, the world is going to radical Islamic hell, and and nobody's paying attention to the convention.
 
Sadly, yes. Just give 'em another week of lagging poll numbers. Then Melania will turn into a Russian agent who's the conduit between Trump and Putin.

Dude, you should probably be quiet. That actually sounds more plausible than the idiocy they're spewing right now.
 
Some retard representing Rhode Island is claiming that Hillary's email scandal -- wait for it -- makes Trump a threat to national security

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...24ced4-547a-11e6-b652-315ae5d4d4dd_story.html


So basically the Democrat tactic here is to whimsically threaten the same punishments for others that were being threatened against them -- even if the other side hasn't done any of those same things.


At this point, it would be highly appropriate to call for a Civil War.
Why? Because the ruthless Democrats, in the interest of not losing, would quickly start embracing guns up to their eyeballs. Such is their hypocrisy

F*** this sh!t - debate is wasted on people like these - at this point, Democrats are only good for fertilizer.

Well, I guess it is good to have a tactic to counter the old Republican trick of accusing the Democrats of doing what they do more of or claiming to represent something the Democrats actually stand for. lol

Anyhow, so here we sit... The Republicans own most of the military and almost all of the guns. But Republicans own something else. They own all of the poor States except New Mexico.
Kind of a crazy messed up confusing Civil War we would have. How would you feed your masses once we cut you off?

Anyhow, both cases are weak and can not be pursued without looking like morons. And I think the Republicans took that well beyond that point already.
There is a legit case in that Trump's psychological profile is such that he would never ever get clearance if not running for high office.
Almost the same can be said about Clinton, except it is not her mind that is the problem.
There is a difference between being a delusional, bigoted, heartless, egomaniac and someone who has made some bad calls.

I support Clinton, but hell, I'd compromise and say let neither of them have the top secret level of clearance until after we know who wins.
Honestly, I'd agree to just about anything if I could prevent Trump from having the access for awhile.
 
Dude, you should probably be quiet. That actually sounds more plausible than the idiocy they're spewing right now.

Hell, they barely have the means to differentiate an apple from an aircraft carrier. They both begin with an "a", after all.
 
Back
Top Bottom