- Joined
- Feb 3, 2016
- Messages
- 43,134
- Reaction score
- 16,114
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
****ing disaster this is.
Look, I'm trans, I'm a Vet. You have no business transitioning while active duty.
Why?
Hmm, let's see, hormones. Just start there. Are you going to deploy someone who might need special medication? We don't do that for many other conditions, why the exception here? You require special oversight, are you going to provide that to deployed troops? Or are you going to say "Not going to deploy you, you're transitioning!" That's a non-starter. Very much against this, sorry my fellow Trans warriors, you wanna transition, GET OUT first.
You also would have to consider what standards would the trans person fall under as well. Just to put a fly in the ointment though....
We kinda already have something like this issue in the military. It's called pregnancy, that seems to increase in rates as deployments come up or I even lost a team member, while on an actual deployment, because she got pregnant (supposedly while on mid-tour leave but I'm skeptical). So, right there, you have exemptions so what we are talking about now are timelines. How long does it take to transition? And, to be even more devil's advocate, actively transitioning trans people would be a significantly lower impact on the force as the numbers would be way lower than pregnancy rates.
So I'm more of a which PT standards do you use and such in wondering how it would be addressed, though your point is also valid.