• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Islamists attack Radiohead fans at Turkish release party

TheGoverness said:
Hey, don't talk about the "Religion of Peace" that way buddy!
Click to expand...
I DID say they were the 'loving' and 'peaceful' religion of peace. Just like the ones that butchered their daughter in the name of love and the glorious cause of Islam.

Not respectful enough?

I'm sure it was justified.
 
ajn678 said:
Good to see we have a music expert in here who belittles a band that has given more to humanity than he ever will. This is supposed to be about Muslims attacking people, not what Obama or Bush did in Iraq. Let's keep on topic.
Click to expand...
That dream ended with the second posting in the thread. ANYTHING to not talk about brutality committed in the great and glorious name of Allah by members of the religion of peace.
 
Hatuey said:
Go for it. I'm waiting.
Click to expand...

I already told you Obama was advised to leave troops in Iraq. And as president he certainly could have. He seems to get his way in other things, either by executive order, or whining like a petulant child.

Also his support of the MB in Egypt with weapons and money was not anyone elses decision. Also the calculated lies about Iran having a moderate in charge that were exposed by his own security counsel when it is as hardline as it ever was.

Obama has set the stage for more terror and more unrest. A perfect mix for Islamists to take full advantage of.
 
coldjoint said:
I already told you Obama was advised to leave troops in Iraq.
Click to expand...

No no, you don't get to start a new argument based on what you said. You stated you could pick apart my claims, so address my claims. Here they are:

1. Bush administration signed withdrawal agreement from Iraq.
2. This agreement removed all troops from Iraq.
3. The agreement did not lose authority with an incoming president.

As I said, try and 'pick apart' my claims.


:)
 
Hatuey said:
No no, you don't get to start a new argument based on what you said. You stated you could pick apart my claims, so address my claims. Here they are:

1. Bush administration signed withdrawal agreement from Iraq.
2. This agreement removed all troops from Iraq.
3. The agreement did not lose authority with an incoming president.

As I said, try and 'pick apart' my claims.


:)
Click to expand...

Is your head made of concrete? I just did.
 
VanceMack said:
I DID say they were the 'loving' and 'peaceful' religion of peace. Just like the ones that butchered their daughter in the name of love and the glorious cause of Islam.

Not respectful enough?

I'm sure it was justified.
Click to expand...

You just reminded me of a funny video:


 
Hatuey said:
Quick question: Who signed the troop removal agreement?

:)
Click to expand...

Who slaughters people who do not believe what they do? That is the topic. You are fixated on something that you think absolves Obama of blame. It doesn't, and it matters not if you think it does or not.
 
coldjoint said:
You are fixated on something that you think absolves Obama of blame. It doesn't, and it matters not if you think it does or not.
Click to expand...

I don't think you can answer a simple question. It's pretty obvious that you can't. Who signed the troop removal agreement?
 
Hatuey said:
I don't think you can answer a simple question. It's pretty obvious that you can't. Who signed the troop removal agreement?
Click to expand...

As I said, along with others, this is not about Bush. Why don't you start another thread?
 
coldjoint said:
As I said, along with others, this is not about Bush. Why don't you start another thread?
Click to expand...

You made it about Bush when you made an erroneous claim about something he did. Again, you are welcome to admit you were wrong any minute now. :)
 
Hatuey said:
You made it about Bush when you made an erroneous claim about something he did. Again, you are welcome to admit you were wrong any minute now. :)
Click to expand...

How about I unmake it? Now tell me why Obama has done nothing of consequence to deal with terrorism?
 
He didn't ban Radiohead?
 
coldjoint said:
How about I unmake it?
Click to expand...

The only way you can do that is by admitting that Bush ordered the Iraq troop withdrawal. Can you do that?
 
Hatuey said:
The only way you can do that is by admitting that Bush ordered the Iraq troop withdrawal. Can you do that?
Click to expand...

I admitted he did. I guess you can't read that well. What I have said Obama watched it unravel and did nothing while he could have, and was advised to do something.

He is an enabler for Islam, and again, I don't care if he is Muslim or not.
 
coldjoint said:
Dealing with what Obama watched happen, please.
Click to expand...

... You can't find your own admission of something in a 92 post thread? I'm shocked. Keep telling people Obama ordered the troop withdrawal. Maybe it will become true one day.
 
Hatuey said:
... You can't find your own admission of something in a 92 post thread? I'm shocked. Keep telling people Obama ordered the troop withdrawal. Maybe it will become true one day.
Click to expand...

You can't acknowledge Obama enabled, and still enables, terrorists. And that doesn't make it false. The fact you refuse to discuss it shows its validity.
 
coldjoint said:
You can't acknowledge Obama enabled, and still enables, terrorists.
Click to expand...

You can't find your admission after having stated you made it. Weird how that works. Let's try this again:

Who signed the US-Iraq withdrawal agreement bringing US forces down to zero by 2011?

You only get 1 chance to answer correctly.
 
Hatuey said:
You can't find your admission after having stated you made it. Weird how that works. Let's try this again:

Who signed the US-Iraq withdrawal agreement bringing US forces down to zero by 2011?

You only get 1 chance to answer correctly.
Click to expand...

That is your last chance. If you do not want to talk about the now instead of the then, I'm done with you.
 
coldjoint said:
That is your last chance. If you do not want to talk about the now instead of the then, I'm done with you.
Click to expand...

You literally spoke about 'the then' before anybody else. You made a statement about what had been done the past. It was shown to be false. Can you admit it was false?


Sent from a flower watered by the tears of Trump supporters and crazy newb liberals.
 
Hatuey said:
You can't find your admission after having stated you made it. Weird how that works. Let's try this again:

Who signed the US-Iraq withdrawal agreement bringing US forces down to zero by 2011?

You only get 1 chance to answer correctly.
Click to expand...
So Obama didn't end the Iraq war, Bush did. Ok, have it your way. But answer this: had McCain won in 2008, do you think he would have left troops there? I will answer for you--of course he would have. Obama wanted the troops out and didn't care about the potential consequences of doing so. ISIS is one of those consequences.
 
Fletch said:
So Obama didn't end the Iraq war, Bush did. Ok, have it your way. But answer this: had McCain won in 2008, do you think he would have left troops there? I will answer for you--of course he would have. Obama wanted the troops out and didn't care about the potential consequences of doing so. ISIS is one of those consequences.
Click to expand...

What McCain would and wouldn't have done became irrelevant when the agreement was signed. Again, this is why it is called an agreement and it is not dependent on the executive who signed it but on the parties that were signatories. The 'democratically elected' Iraqi government wanted the US gone and played the central role in setting the guidelines. The agreement was dependent on the Iraqi government negotiating a permanent US presence in the country. Which they never did. Anything else about people's personal wishes and hopes are irrelevant in this matter. The US government - under Obama - attempted to keep about 3000 men in order to continue training Iraqi forces and even this was rejected by Maliki's government.


Sent from a flower watered by the tears of Trump supporters and crazy newb liberals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom