• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Russian government hackers penetrated DNC, stole opposition research on Trump

They caught one of the hacker, where the **** have you been?

Romanian hacker who says he breached Clinton server finalizing plea deal | Fox News

Get clue, dude.

And if you'll check, NO news agency - not a single one - verified or was able to verify the guy's claim. But of course that doesn't matter to you. Why? Because he said something that you and the rest of the right wing wanted to hear, and who the hell cares about due diligence, about verifying his claim? His claim MUST be true, right? It's gotta be true because it's something that you wanted to hear.

That reliance on hearing what you want to hear without verifying the claim is the same kind of reliance on assumptions that convinced the Bush administration that Iraq was involved in the 9/11 attacks. But who cares, huh?
 
And if you'll check, NO news agency - not a single one - verified or was able to verify the guy's claim. But of course that doesn't matter to you. Why? Because he said something that you and the rest of the right wing wanted to hear, and who the hell cares about due diligence, about verifying his claim? His claim MUST be true, right? It's gotta be true because it's something that you wanted to hear.

That reliance on hearing what you want to hear without verifying the claim is the same kind of reliance on assumptions that convinced the Bush administration that Iraq was involved in the 9/11 attacks. But who cares, huh?

And what news agency would you trust? Hmmmm?
 
And what news agency would you trust? Hmmmm?

I trust a news agency that holds itself to verifying wild claims FIRST...as opposed to those news agencies that publish wild claims as fact without first verifying them as part of due diligence. But of course since adhering to silly little things like "due diligence" would cost Fox News and conservative pundits at least half of their content, y'all can't even consider it.
 
I trust a news agency that holds itself to verifying wild claims FIRST...as opposed to those news agencies that publish wild claims as fact without first verifying them as part of due diligence. But of course since adhering to silly little things like "due diligence" would cost Fox News and conservative pundits at least half of their content, y'all can't even consider it.

Fox haters gonna hate. Have a nice day.
 
Back
Top Bottom