faithful_servant
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 18, 2006
- Messages
- 12,533
- Reaction score
- 5,660
- Location
- Beautiful Central Oregon
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
First of all, Oregon is a "Right to die" state, so we can kill ourselves all we want, but I'd like to tell you about my father-in-law's passing:
Roy was an old logger and tough as they come, but hit guts just couldn't keep up any more and he ended up on life support as his body started falling apart form the stress. They took him off of life support on Tuesday morning and expected him pass away within the hour, but Roy had other plans and just kept living. We all knew that he was suffering in spite of the meds (morphine), and after two days, he just wouldn't die. My brother-in-law (a top end ER nurse) eventually started talking to the nurses on staff and had them start upping his morphine, until he finally just took over and bumped the morphine up to the point where Roy finally passed on, lying the arms of his wife of 40+ years.
In spite of laws for and against "right to die", there are always ways to accomplish what these laws attempt to prevent and ways to get around the requirements of these laws. If the State of Oregon wanted to stick their noses into Roy's death, they could probably prosecute for some level of manslaughter, but that will never happen. At some point, it's better to simply turn a blind eye to these things than it is to shine a big spotlight on them. "Physician assisted suicide" has been around for as long as there have been physicians and will continue to be around as long as people have to face the suffering of a loved one.
All that was said to show that there is a time and place for this kind of thing, but most RTD laws allows far more than the compassionate ending of a person's suffering. In the OP, there was this quote:
Roy was an old logger and tough as they come, but hit guts just couldn't keep up any more and he ended up on life support as his body started falling apart form the stress. They took him off of life support on Tuesday morning and expected him pass away within the hour, but Roy had other plans and just kept living. We all knew that he was suffering in spite of the meds (morphine), and after two days, he just wouldn't die. My brother-in-law (a top end ER nurse) eventually started talking to the nurses on staff and had them start upping his morphine, until he finally just took over and bumped the morphine up to the point where Roy finally passed on, lying the arms of his wife of 40+ years.
In spite of laws for and against "right to die", there are always ways to accomplish what these laws attempt to prevent and ways to get around the requirements of these laws. If the State of Oregon wanted to stick their noses into Roy's death, they could probably prosecute for some level of manslaughter, but that will never happen. At some point, it's better to simply turn a blind eye to these things than it is to shine a big spotlight on them. "Physician assisted suicide" has been around for as long as there have been physicians and will continue to be around as long as people have to face the suffering of a loved one.
All that was said to show that there is a time and place for this kind of thing, but most RTD laws allows far more than the compassionate ending of a person's suffering. In the OP, there was this quote:
Sorry, but having to have help wiping your butt is not a reason to die. When you are struggling to for every breath, wracked with the pain of pancreatic cancer or facing a life time of constant intensive pain, that's when you get to lay your life down, not because of the embarrassment of having to have help wiping your butt..."For me, it's if I can no longer hygienically take care of myself," she told NBC News, adding, "I don't want my husband to have to."