• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Denies Posing Spokesperson

The WP has been after Trump since the beginning of his candidacy, posting whatever **** they can get their hands on. They've gone full on yellow journalism in this pursuit.

Sent from my toaster using nano-bread
What about this story isn't true?
 
What about this story isn't true?

I heard the tape on the news this morning. It sure sounds like Trump but I cant say for sure. Would I recognize or remember a tape of myself 25 years ago? Probably not, so I am not sure what this proves or why it matters.
 
I heard the tape on the news this morning. It sure sounds like Trump but I cant say for sure. Would I recognize or remember a tape of myself 25 years ago? Probably not, so I am not sure what this proves or why it matters.

It's him. Positive.

The question is, why did he flat out deny something so obviously provable?
 
It's him. Positive.

The question is, why did he flat out deny something so obviously provable?

Because that is what he does. He seems incapable of ever admitting a mistake.
 
A hater right on cue.

Where in the WAPO article did they submit proof of their claims? THINK!!!!

I noticed you declined to answer these questions:


Hey smartie pants: Where is this John Miller / Barron?

Yuknow? Do you??

How bout starting with that.

Or the ridiculous thought someone working for Trump is going to fake his voice, over and over to reporters -- THEN, the story coming out quoting the spokesman, and The Trump not saying a word about "someone faking it" back then.

You think Trump would allow someone (er...need scare quotes around that word "someone..."
to speak for him that wasn't authorized, and let it play out in the press if a person at his head office was faking his voice?)

Do you accept the fact Trump admitted he role played the guy?


If you can answer these questions, you'll get five gold stars.
 
Do you accept the fact Trump admitted he role played the guy?

I accepted that fact as soon as proof was submitted in the SLATE article, which was completely lacking in the WaPo article. You having trouble with reading? Everything else in your diatrabe is pointless noise. You can have the last word. You appear to be raging against the heavens at this point.
 
The WP has been after Trump since the beginning of his candidacy, posting whatever **** they can get their hands on. They've gone full on yellow journalism in this pursuit.

Sent from my toaster using nano-bread

Do you actually read what you type or do you just copy paste from trump interviews?

As I have asked many trump supporters in the past: If you don't post any evidence to back up your claims, how can I take you seriously?
 
Do you actually read what you type or do you just copy paste from trump interviews?

As I have asked many trump supporters in the past: If you don't post any evidence to back up your claims, how can I take you seriously?

Do you actually read my posts before dismissing them because they don't fit your bias? Are you denying the WP has been posting negative slanted articles about Trump since the beginning of his candidacy? Any old thing they can get their hands on and they'll twist it until it looks sufficiently dastardly.

Now what other claims have I made in this thread that you think I need evidence to back up? How can I take you seriously?
 
And Hillary denies setting up a private server to circumvent the system with private communications, regardless if it meant compromising top secret information.

Trump and Hillary are the lowest forms of humanity.

The good news is you don't have to vote for either.

Gary Johnson 2016.
 
Donald Trump denies posing as spokesman in recordings Washington Post uncovered - TODAY.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ac99ec-16fe-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html

Trump says he doesn't know anything about this tape uncovered by Washington Post from the 1990s when he posed as his own PR person under different names. If you listen to the voice and it's mannerisms it definitely is Trump. Then he goes off on Washington Post and Jeff Bezos himself. I wonder why???

Trump: Bezos using 'Washington Post' to protect Amazon monopoly

Trump says Washington Post owner Bezos has 'huge antitrust problem' | Fox News

Can someone explain to me what new ground is that is being broken here? Trump is a narcissist? Already known. So is his opponent and the current president.
 
I accepted that fact as soon as proof was submitted in the SLATE article, which was completely lacking in the WaPo article. You having trouble with reading? Everything else in your diatrabe is pointless noise. You can have the last word. You appear to be raging against the heavens at this point.

^ Down the Rabbit hole gone. ^
 
Do you actually read my posts before dismissing them because they don't fit your bias? Are you denying the WP has been posting negative slanted articles about Trump since the beginning of his candidacy? Any old thing they can get their hands on and they'll twist it until it looks sufficiently dastardly.

Now what other claims have I made in this thread that you think I need evidence to back up? How can I take you seriously?

The reason I'm asking about the Washington post is because other outlets carried this story. Yet you only took trumps word and like a loyal sheep you just mention Washington post just because he is attacking it

Post your evidence I'll wait....
 
Can someone explain to me what new ground is that is being broken here? Trump is a narcissist? Already known. So is his opponent and the current president.

Just more proof of his mental instability and his habit of full bore pathological lying.

Why would he lie about something so obviously provable?

Why?
 
Just more proof of his mental instability and his habit of full bore pathological lying.

Why would he lie about something so obviously provable?

Why?


Sounds like he has all the makings of a politician!
 
The reason I'm asking about the Washington post is because other outlets carried this story. Yet you only took trumps word and like a loyal sheep you just mention Washington post just because he is attacking it

Post your evidence I'll wait....

Quote for me where I took Trump's word on this. Post your evidence I'll wait....
 
Sounds like he has all the makings of a politician!

All politicians lie.

All of them.

He has taken it to a stellar level, and when you lie like he does about something so obviously provably a lie, so often, that's a mental illness.
 
Quote for me where I took Trump's word on this. Post your evidence I'll wait....

Lol. I just explained this to you. Why are you not attacking today, slate, daily mail?? They all carried the story. Yet trump is going after Washington post. Do you do too.

Now what evidence besides for this, do you have that Washington post is targeting trump negatively
 
All politicians lie.

All of them.

He has taken it to a stellar level, and when you lie like he does about something so obviously provably a lie, so often, that's a mental illness.

Oh, you mean like, "my husband did not rape that woman!" or "you mean like wipe it with a cloth? I don't know what that means.".
 
Lol. I just explained this to you. Why are you not attacking today, slate, daily mail?? They all carried the story. Yet trump is going after Washington post. Do you do too.

Now what evidence besides for this, do you have that Washington post is targeting trump negatively

You didn't explain anything, you just got caught with your bias showing and now you're trying to cover. Trump is going after the WP because, before Bezos bought it, though it had seriously declined, it wasn't a yellow journalism rag. I didn't mention Slate or the Daily Mail because they have never been anything other than toilet paper.
 
Oh, you mean like, "my husband did not rape that woman!" or "you mean like wipe it with a cloth? I don't know what that means.".

Even the woman who claimed she was raped by Clinton said under oath she wasn't raped by clinton -- so #1, stoopid example.

Your second one is even stooooopider.

Then again, being a member in the Trump cult usually means grand scale logic abandonment.

Congrats! You've arrived. Follow your fully realized, lying sock puppet to the ends of the earth.

He will not disappoint you.

He promises.
 
You didn't explain anything, you just got caught with your bias showing and now you're trying to cover. Trump is going after the WP because, before Bezos bought it, though it had seriously declined, it wasn't a yellow journalism rag. I didn't mention Slate or the Daily Mail because they have never been anything other than toilet paper.

Well you still never posted evidence of this claim. You just keep spouting trump talking points
 
Another cult member is heard from.
No, not a member of any cult.
We told y'all that the media was propping him up, that they were sitting on oppo material that would make him and y'all look ridiculous. You didn't listen - this is just the beginning.

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk

I fail to see any sort of bearing that hit piece in describing long ago and non-relevant facts have anything to do with the present situation.

So, yes, flinging poo.
 
Even the woman who claimed she was raped by Clinton said under oath she wasn't raped by clinton -- so #1, stoopid example.

Your second one is even stooooopider.

Then again, being a member in the Trump cult usually means grand scale logic abandonment.

Congrats! You've arrived. Follow your fully realized, lying sock puppet to the ends of the earth.

He will not disappoint you.

He promises.

Nice try, but wrong. Pretty much what you'd expect from a member of the Clinton defense cult.

In the fall of 1997, Paula Jones’s private investigators tried to talk to Broaddrick at her home, also secretly taping the conversation.[9] Broaddrick refused to discuss the incident, saying “it was just a horrible horrible thing,” and that she “wouldn’t relive it for anything.”[11] The investigators told her she would likely be subpoenaed if she would not talk to them. Broaddrick said she would deny everything, saying “you can’t get to him, and I’m not going to ruin my good name to do it… there’s just absolutely no way anyone can get to him, he’s just too vicious.”[

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juanita_Broaddrick
 
Well you still never posted evidence of this claim. You just keep spouting trump talking points

What claim? That the WP has been posting negative and slanted articles against Trump since his candidacy began? You seriously deny that they have?
 
Back
Top Bottom