- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 39,082
- Reaction score
- 9,646
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Why yes conservatives never exhibit this behavior!
Moral equivalence gets trotted out an awful lot.
Why yes conservatives never exhibit this behavior!
i said this before, but i will repeat it.
adams using his fame and concert as collective to repeal a law, the same as trying to get a law created.
business are not being collective in law making by refusing someone a service.
I doubt very much Mississippi will look at changing any laws because Bryan Adams is boycotting the state, and I'll flat-out guarantee Bryan Adams doesn't think they will.
You might, just might, be indulging in a flight of hyperbole.
Besides, it's Mississippi. Who wouldn't jump on a chance to boycott Mississippi?
thats true, however he is using his name and the concert as a tool, to try to change law, the same as if he was trying to get a law made.
he acting as a self collective power on MISS law making, and collective law making is evil.
oh i understand what you are saying, he not going to make them change their minds, however, i hate collectives who work to create or change laws to there own advantage.
What the **** is a self collective
Do you hate it when more than one person votes for a thing?
a collective is group of people who work to achieve a goal, the group does not care about the rights of other people or the powers of governments to achieve that goal, they are single focused on getting what they want any way they can.
adams ia single person, but has fame and the power of the concert he is using as a collective entity, because of concert sales and service for it/ revenue.
in our congress in Washington there are thousand upon thousands of collective groups lobbying congress to get laws made in their own collective interest at the expense of the people, the states and the union as whole....and this is destroying our nation.
no i don't, the founders state the people can vote collectedly, but they are to excluded from being able to make collective laws.
All laws are collective laws, what the **** are you talking about.
How famous do I have to be before I am no longer allowed to express my opinion? What level of fame makes a celebrity lose his freedom of speech?
:roll:
Given how many GOP politicians sign anti-gay legislation with one hand whilst jerking someone off with the other, maybe you should cut the "DERP LIBERAL" crap and understand that it's a human staple.
More Republicans Lawmakers Have Been Arrested For Bathroom Misconduct Than Trans People – The Gaily Grind
By now, you have got to be tired of all this talk of ‘bathroom bills’ targeting the transgender community. So am I! But I never tire of putting so-called social conservatives in their place, so let’s turn this thing on its head.
Bathroom bills are a tactic used by social conservatives to keep trans individuals from using the bathroom associated with their gender identities. The argument goes that by allowing this, we’re essentially allowing predators into women’s bathrooms.
But stats show that no trans person has ever been arrested for sexual misconduct in a public bathroom in the U.S. Certain Republican lawmakers, however, cannot say the same.
Meanwhile.......
Meanwhile:
What a schmuck.
Not surprising. There will be plenty of things like this because of Mississippi foolishness. We all knew there would be economic consequences, no sense in bitching about it now.
Actually, this is entirely the fault of LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ whack jobs suing to force people to serve them against their will, and contrary to freedom of religion. Not, "Mississippi foolishness". :roll:
They probably won't be upset by this. Mississippi, and other states for that matter, seem okay with trading economic activity for making this political point.
I find it sad that this is where we are. In this case Mississippi did this to themselves.
sorta kinda.
Bryan Adams boycotts Mississippi of anti-LGBT legalization... but performs in a country that is actually anti-lgbt...
Mississippi is a ultra liberal utopia compared to Egypt...
All about that love and tolerance... unless you happen to be a citizen in a state that did something that you didn't like.
Refusing to provide a voluntary service in a state..... Freedom of speech.
Refusing to provide a voluntary service in a state..... Freedom of speech.
I never said he shouldn't be allowed to do it. I find it silly though how people will say it was wrong and illegal for cake bakers to refuse to cater a gay wedding yet applaud someone boycotting and refusing to serve the people of an entire state over the political actions of their state legislature. Does freedom of speech not go both ways?
I never said he shouldn't be allowed to do it. I find it silly though how people will say it was wrong and illegal for cake bakers to refuse to cater a gay wedding yet applaud someone boycotting and refusing to serve the people of an entire state over the political actions of their state legislature. Does freedom of speech not go both ways?
Interesting.