• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pro-Gun Activist Jamie Gilt Accidentally Shot By Her 4-Year-Old Son [W:116]

Re: Pro-Gun Activist Jamie Gilt Accidentally Shot By Her 4-Year-Old Son

Threegoofs said:
The answer is yes.
Any other basic knowledge you need to be schooled on, since you've apparently entered a debate where you don't understand any counter arguments?
Click to expand...
You could answer the question I originally asked you:
Is Black and Decker liable for the injuries caused with one of their saws after the safety guard is taken off?
 
Re: Pro-Gun Activist Jamie Gilt Accidentally Shot By Her 4-Year-Old Son

TOG 6 said:
You could answer the question I originally asked you:
Is Black and Decker liable for the injuries caused with one of their saws after the safety guard is taken off?
Click to expand...

Your question is irrelevant, as I demonstrated with my counter question.

Anything else you don't understand? I'm here to help.
 
Re: Pro-Gun Activist Jamie Gilt Accidentally Shot By Her 4-Year-Old Son

Threegoofs said:
Your question is irrelevant...
Click to expand...
In other words, you cannot honestly answer it.
Thought so.
 
Re: Pro-Gun Activist Jamie Gilt Accidentally Shot By Her 4-Year-Old Son

TOG 6 said:
In other words, you cannot honestly answer it.
Thought so.
Click to expand...

If you recall, YOU were the only one who stated they couldn't answer a question.

Yours is just too stupid and irrelevant to spend time on, because it has nothing to do with the topic.
 
Re: Pro-Gun Activist Jamie Gilt Accidentally Shot By Her 4-Year-Old Son

Threegoofs said:
If you recall, YOU were the only one who stated they couldn't answer a question.
Yours is just too stupid and irrelevant to spend time on, because it has nothing to do with the topic.
Click to expand...
I accept your concession of the point.
Thank you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom