• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iran Threatens to Walk Away From Nuke Deal After New Missile Test

MrT said:
Iran has not violated the nuclear sanctions such that the snap back provisions are required.
Click to expand...

If that's true, that is testimony to just how bad this "deal" was. I hope Obama doesn't make any sudden left turns, someone's liable to get their nose broke. ;)
 
MickeyW said:
Iran on Tuesday again threatened to walk away from the nuclear agreement reached last year with global powers, hours after the country breached international agreements by test-firing ballistic missiles.

Iran’s most recent ballistic missile test, which violates current U.N. Security Council resolutions, comes a day after the international community’s nuclear watchdog organization disclosed that it is prohibited by the nuclear agreement from publicly reporting on potential violations by Iran.

Iran Threatens to Walk Away From Nuke Deal




Fine with me...I hope they do walk!
Click to expand...

they agreed to a deal last year to........... stall action against them and give themselves more time work on their project.
 
countryboy said:
If that's true, that is testimony to just how bad this "deal" was. I hope Obama doesn't make any sudden left turns, someone's liable to get their nose broke. ;)
Click to expand...

This was the first major agreement between the United States and Iran in more than 40 years.

Not only did Iran subject themselves to dismantling multiple aspects of their nuclear program and to subject themselves to the most invasive and intrusive nuclear inspection regime in the world, but this deal also solidified in the minds of the Iranian people that a more moderate approach was necessary and helpful. And that is why the Iranian people voted in a virtual sweep of the moderate candidates during the most recent election.

But I am sure that calling them terrorists and murderers would have gotten a better deal. And I am sure that Donald Trump would have succeeded in making Iran dismantle their entire military as well as turn over their sovereignty.
 
jimbo said:
It was being held against outstanding unsettled claims.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the acknowledgement that they weren't paid to accept the P-5+1 deal.
 
Montecresto said:
Thanks for the acknowledgement that they weren't paid to accept the P-5+1 deal.
Click to expand...

They didn't accept a non treaty, agreement, or whatever you want to call it.

They do have, however, a few billion bucks more than they had to build nuclear reactors or fund terrorists.

And we got nuthin'. Solely on Obama's order, bypassing laws he signed.

Typical Obama deal.
 
jimbo said:
They didn't accept a non treaty, agreement, or whatever you want to call it.

They do have, however, a few billion bucks more than they had to build nuclear reactors or fund terrorists.

And we got nuthin'. Solely on Obama's order, bypassing laws he signed.

Typical Obama deal.
Click to expand...

Their frozen assets were released upon acceptance of the P-5+1 agreement that I will remind you was brokered by the US, China, France, Germany and Russia, try as you may to give all credit to Obama. Iran isn't building a nuke and it didn't take another worthless Bush style war to shut it down.
 
Montecresto said:
Their frozen assets were released upon acceptance of the P-5+1 agreement that I will remind you was brokered by the US, China, France, Germany and Russia, try as you may to give all credit to Obama. Iran isn't building a nuke and it didn't take another worthless Bush style war to shut it down.
Click to expand...

They didn't accept. And if they did, they have already violated. That's the point.

It has nothing to do with Bush.
 
jimbo said:
They didn't accept. And if they did, they have already violated. That's the point.

It has nothing to do with Bush.
Click to expand...

We avoided a senseless war unlike Bush. Again, Iran is not building a nuke, otherwise they may as well tell the UN to walk and do as they please like the US does.
 
Montecresto said:
We avoided a senseless war unlike Bush. Again, Iran is not building a nuke, otherwise they may as well tell the UN to walk and do as they please like the US does.
Click to expand...

Your statements have nothing to do with my posts.
 
jimbo said:
Your statements have nothing to do with my posts.
Click to expand...

The aim of the P-5+1 was to get Iran to shutter its nuclear program in terms of weapons grade production. Do you have any evidence that Iran is building a nuclear weapon?
 
Montecresto said:
The aim of the P-5+1 was to get Iran to shutter its nuclear program in terms of weapons grade production. Do you have any evidence that Iran is building a nuclear weapon?
Click to expand...

Your statements have nothing to do with my posts. But again, there is no agreement.

I didn't mention anything, anywhere, any time, anything about a nuclear weapon. So I won't be looking for evidence to that subject, for or against.

For that matter, I didn't mention P 5 + 1 or Q 7 - 6 or Y 9 x 4.

I won't be spending a lot of time on those either.
 
W
jimbo said:
Your statements have nothing to do with my posts. But again, there is no agreement.

I didn't mention anything, anywhere, any time, anything about a nuclear weapon. So I won't be looking for evidence to that subject, for or against.

For that matter, I didn't mention P 5 + 1 or Q 7 - 6 or Y 9 x 4.

I won't be spending a lot of time on those either.
Click to expand...

And apparently you have no idea why Iran is threatening a walk out. Who cares right, Iran's always wrong and Americas always right. Rah rah Murica.
 
ocean515 said:
That is what I'm reading from you and other posters. And what of Kerry's, and for that matter, Hilary Clinton's legacy as Secretary of State?

Hilary is on record as being in support of the Iran deal, although she has said she didn't trust the regime. That's an interesting way to believe common ground has been reached.

In the end, Iran gets it's hands on $10's of billions, and nothing has been accomplished.

My guess is the same backroom people who negotiate trade deals were involved in the backroom work on the Iran deal.
Click to expand...

It is some of the most incompetent negotiating I've ever seen in my life. It embarrasses me, actually.
 
Iran's ballistic missile tests violate UN/IAEA restrictions on Iran concerning ballistic missile payload-weight and missile range.

Iran is forbidden to test any missile that can (structurally) accommodate a nuclear warhead.

These UN ballistic missile violations have nothing to do with the P5+1 nuclear deal. They are separate restrictions that have remained in place.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom