• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Julian Assange claims 'vindication' after UN report

DA60

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
16,386
Reaction score
7,793
Location
Where I am now
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
'LONDON -- A United Nations human rights panel has sided with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in his long-running battle with Swedish and British authorities, saying he should be allowed to walk free immediately and compensated for the years he has lost.
The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which falls under the offices of the UN human rights chief, said Assange has been "arbitrarily detained" by Britain and Sweden since December 2010, when he was first sought for questioning on allegations of sexual misconduct.
The panel's recommendation was immediately rejected by Swedish and British officials who said Assange's legal situation is unchanged. He remains in the Embassy of Ecuador in London, where he has been holed up for more than three years ago.'


Julian Assange claims total vindication with UN panel ruling he's been arbitrarily detained | CTV News


Thoughts?
 
My thoughts?

I have no idea if he is guilty of the crimes he has been accused of in Sweden.

But I do not agree with the way he has been treated by the British and I applaud the UN decision.
 
My thoughts?

I have no idea if he is guilty of the crimes he has been accused of in Sweden.

But I do not agree with the way he has been treated by the British and I applaud the UN decision.



Me neither.

But I do know that spy agencies all over this planet have always used sex against their adversaries.

I would not be a bit surprised if that's what has happened in this case. We may never know or years from now it might all come out.
 
My thoughts?

I have no idea if he is guilty of the crimes he has been accused of in Sweden.

But I do not agree with the way he has been treated by the British and I applaud the UN decision.
What exactly do you not agree with?
Do you think they should just ignore the fact that he had a warrant out for his arrest?
 
Back
Top Bottom