• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New poll gauges American rage: 77% of Republicans get angry at least once a day

This is the same old smear labeling that the left have done. I remember when the term they used was "angry white male" to ostracize anyone who disagreed with them. The left really only have two strategies for defeating they're opponents; call them angry or call them crazy.
There's plenty of videos out there of left wingers going bat chit and screaming like lunatics.
 
This is the same old smear labeling that the left have done. I remember when the term they used was "angry white male" to ostracize anyone who disagreed with them. The left really only have two strategies for defeating they're opponents; call them angry or call them crazy.
There's plenty of videos out there of left wingers going bat chit and screaming like lunatics.

What ?

They said democrats are angry almost as often...
 
This is the same old smear labeling that the left have done. I remember when the term they used was "angry white male" to ostracize anyone who disagreed with them. The left really only have two strategies for defeating they're opponents; call them angry or call them crazy.
There's plenty of videos out there of left wingers going bat chit and screaming like lunatics.

If you cant deal with the idea then label the speaker garbage and ignore, that is the tactic. Conservatives do it too, it is a trick the elite use to guard their fragile egos from inconvenient reality. The underclass tend to get this kind on nonsense beat out of them by life.
 
Last edited:
Just like I said in the second post, this is good news for the Republicans:
One thing pollsters have a hard time projecting is turnout, and it's likely to be a critical factor this year. How many of those people telling pollsters — especially robocall and Internet pollsters — that they support Donald Trump will actually vote? Which of our two parties' candidates will arouse more enthusiasm among their voters and thereby tip a roughly evenly balanced electorate their way?

But polls can provide clues, and a Rasmussen poll provides evidence that this year, unlike 2008 and to a lesser extent 2012, the balance of enthusiasm favors Republicans. Rasmussen, a robocall poll, asked respondents identifying themselves as likely voters whether they were looking forward to this year's presidential race or whether they had had enough of the race even though the first votes have not yet been cast.

Overall, 58 percent said they were looking forward to the race, while 37 percent said they have had enough. But the responses of Republicans and Democrats were very different. Among Republicans, 71 percent are looking forward and 25 percent have had enough. Among Democrats, 50 percent are looking forward and 44 percent have had enough. An astonishing (and likely overstated) 79 percent said they have watched at least some of the presidential debates, with 70 percent saying they watched those of both political parties. Some 25 percent watched only Republican debates and a pitifully low 5 percent watched only Democratic debates. That's in line with the television ratings which have shown significantly higher viewership of Republican debates — in contrast to 2008.
Rasmussen poll suggests Republicans are more enthusiastic than Democrats this year | Washington Examiner
 
Back
Top Bottom