• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Struggling DNC craves tax dollars for convention

NonoBadDog

Hates Kittens
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
17,226
Reaction score
6,895
Location
Mountains
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Struggling DNC craves tax dollars for convention

Already struggling with finances, the Democratic Party has drafted a plan to have taxpayers help pay about $20 million for next summer’s nominating convention, reversing a change Congress approved just a year ago.
Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is also a congresswoman from Florida, has drafted a bill to restore money that both parties used to receive from the federal government to help defray the costs of running their quadrennial conventions.

The Congressional Budget Office revealed the move in a letter released Friday, which said Ms. Wasserman Schultz’s proposal to tap a presidential campaign fund would likely mean each party could get about $20 million in taxpayer money to help with costs.


The DNC is facing tough financial circumstances. The latest report shows it had just $4.7 million in cash on hand as of Oct. 31, less than the $6.9 million in debts the committee reported. By contrast, the Republican National Committee reported $20.4 million in cash, offset by $1.9 million in debts.
Neither the DNC nor Ms. Wasserman Schultz’s congressional office returned messages seeking comment on her plans.
Republican National Committee spokeswoman Allison Moore said the party doesn’t need the help.


“We support no taxpayer funding as long as there’s an alternate way for us to raise the funds to mount a successful convention,” she said in an email.
It was only last year when lawmakers nixed money for the conventions, deciding the political parties and their presidential nominees — who each raised $1 billion in 2012 — didn’t need help from taxpayers anymore.



Uhh, no. Too bad. Neither party should get tax payer funds to fund their conventions other than the security costs, which are already funded.
 
Struggling DNC craves tax dollars for convention





Uhh, no. Too bad. Neither party should get tax payer funds to fund their conventions other than the security costs, which are already funded.

If the People fund it, the free speech "zones" (that seems like a bit of the old double speak, but whatever) should be allowed right outside the convention.
 
If the People fund it, the free speech "zones" (that seems like a bit of the old double speak, but whatever) should be allowed right outside the convention.

I totally agree. And the free speech zones should have the same access, visibility and distance from the main entrance as each other.
 
Struggling DNC craves tax dollars for convention





Uhh, no. Too bad. Neither party should get tax payer funds to fund their conventions other than the security costs, which are already funded.

That they need help and that Schultz felt that asking was cool speaks volumes. Why not ask some of the super wealthy that generally support party policies? I have no dog in that hunt anymore than I do the republican hunt for financial assistance. Yooz guys are on your own there.
 
The states already contribute enough in conducting the primaries according to party rules. Other than perhaps security, they can charge admission and make up the difference in registration fees.
 
The parties don't need a fancy convention. Each party (and others if they qualify) should receive a certain amount of tax money for their campaigns, and that's it. Ban private donations and of course ban corporate donations. Run on ideas, not on spending the most money.
 
Can't say I am surprised, but I am disappointed that some in Congress want to shift huge convention costs onto the tax payer.
 
Back
Top Bottom