• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Drug Kingpin El Chapo Guzmán Reportedly Threatens To Retaliate Against ISIS

Cardinal

Respected On All Sides
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
106,843
Reaction score
98,895
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Another chapter in my ongoing series, titled, "Sure, Why Not."

Fugitive Mexican drug lord Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán has reportedly threatened to eliminate ISIS if it continues to destroy his drug shipments to unspecified Middle East countries that go through the terrorist group’s so called “caliphate,” a website called cartel.blog reported Thursday.

In a harshly-worded encrypted email addressed to ISIS head Abu Bakd Badhdadi, the head of the powerful Sinaloa Cartel reportedly said: “My men will destroy you. The world is not yours to dictate. I pity the next son of a whore who tries to interfere with the business of the Sinaloa Cartel. I will have their heart and tongue torn from them.”

Forbes Welcome

I say if the bloodthirsty leader of one of the world's foremost drug cartels wants to take a whack at ISIS, let him. As a matter of fact, let's reincarnate Genghis Khan and let him have a go.

Chapter one here (although I didn't start the thread):

http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-non-msm/239936-anonymous-declares-war-isis.html
 
Another chapter in my ongoing series, titled, "Sure, Why Not."



Forbes Welcome

I say if the bloodthirsty leader of one of the world's foremost drug cartels wants to take a whack at ISIS, let him. As a matter of fact, let's reincarnate Genghis Khan and let him have a go.

Chapter one here (although I didn't start the thread):

http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-non-msm/239936-anonymous-declares-war-isis.html

I suppose we could try cloning Genghis Khan from one of his many posterity in Mongolia.
 
Another chapter in my ongoing series, titled, "Sure, Why Not."



Forbes Welcome

I say if the bloodthirsty leader of one of the world's foremost drug cartels wants to take a whack at ISIS, let him. As a matter of fact, let's reincarnate Genghis Khan and let him have a go.

Chapter one here (although I didn't start the thread):

http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-non-msm/239936-anonymous-declares-war-isis.html
He'll probably do a better job of it than Obama.
 
And, in other news, after finding out that a Muslim believes that he goes to hell if killed by a woman, Las Vegas prostitutes have signed up for the Marines. LOL.
 
Funny thread. lol

El Chapo had a twitter war with Trump that was kind of funny.

If I recall, El Chapo only had a couple hundred thousand followers on Twitter ....and today I heard that ISIS has over 5 million followers on it's social network. Somehow I don't see El Chapo winning a war with ISIS. But I'd like to see him try.
 
He'll probably do a better job of it than Obama.

Well, one thing for sure. The cartels can behead as good as anybody.

Not sure beheading is allowed on Obama's court. But, Obama is one terrorist killing son-of-a-gun, just the same.

I'm sure ISIS will like it when Obama is gone.
 
Everyone has their personal El Chapo to overcome... for ISIS, El Chapo is a dangerous guy who wants to kill them...

 
I am surprisingly OK with this.
 
Everyone has their personal El Chapo to overcome... for ISIS, El Chapo is a dangerous guy who wants to kill them...

Can I have your watch when you are dead?
 
Funny thread. lol

El Chapo had a twitter war with Trump that was kind of funny.

If I recall, El Chapo only had a couple hundred thousand followers on Twitter ....and today I heard that ISIS has over 5 million followers on it's social network. Somehow I don't see El Chapo winning a war with ISIS. But I'd like to see him try.

If only you had one bullet per twitter follower
 
relevant :)

BBC_Heroin_Chart.gif
 
Another chapter in my ongoing series, titled, "Sure, Why Not."

Forbes Welcome

I say if the bloodthirsty leader of one of the world's foremost drug cartels wants to take a whack at ISIS, let him. As a matter of fact, let's reincarnate Genghis Khan and let him have a go.

Chapter one here (although I didn't start the thread):

http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-non-msm/239936-anonymous-declares-war-isis.html

Not surprising, but there really is no association to Anonymous for a "sure, why not." At least Anonymous is pretending to be interested in human rights and treatment. A drug lord is upset because of control over drug trade, that is really all this comes down to.

For historical reference, it is no surprise to see issues across the Middle East also impact drug trade to/from/within the region. We saw this in Iraq and Afghanistan, and honestly been seeing this sort of thing since Vietnam (even before here and there) where control over regional conflict means at least association impacts over drug trade. Unfortunate but very true. So much so that it would not shock me in the slightest to see ISIS goals and intentions conflict with various Drug Lords source product locations.

In this case, probably opium... but ironically because of the reason that is listed in the article. ISIS is against drug consumption, and like most strict social conservative thinking of the region is willing to kill those that participate in it and destroy what they are transporting. Makes perfect sense that El Chapo is ready for "war" in the criminal enterprise / street sense.
 
Another chapter in my ongoing series, titled, "Sure, Why Not."



Forbes Welcome

I say if the bloodthirsty leader of one of the world's foremost drug cartels wants to take a whack at ISIS, let him. As a matter of fact, let's reincarnate Genghis Khan and let him have a go.

Chapter one here (although I didn't start the thread):

http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-non-msm/239936-anonymous-declares-war-isis.html

Sounds like the making of a profitable video game.
 
Well, one thing for sure. The cartels can behead as good as anybody.

Not sure beheading is allowed on Obama's court. But, Obama is one terrorist killing son-of-a-gun, just the same.

I'm sure ISIS will like it when Obama is gone.

So that's why ISIS is contained..
 
Well now we can be pretty sure at least one drug cartel won't be helping ISIS cross the border.
 
Am pretty certain El Chapo will thoroughly destroy ISIS just like Anonymous did and also like Jordan promised after ISIS burned alive their one pilot.
 
Extremely relevant. There's a damn good reason Afghanistan isn't a parking lot these days, and this is why.

estimates are as high as $500 billion a year.... many accuse the usa of invading Afghanistan solely to protect the heroin trade, which the taliban outlawed a few months before they attacked the world trade center. Many soldiers claimed they were stationed in Afghanistan specifically to guard poppy fields, and nothing more, specifically British soldiers for some reason

In the wake of the 2001 US bombing of Afghanistan, the British government of Tony Blair was entrusted by the G-8 Group of leading industrial nations to carry out a drug eradication program, which would, in theory, allow Afghan farmers to switch out of poppy cultivation into alternative crops. The British were working out of Kabul in close liaison with the US DEA’s “Operation Containment”.

The UK sponsored crop eradication program is an obvious smokescreen. Since October 2001, opium poppy cultivation has skyrocketed. The presence of occupation forces in Afghanistan did not result in the eradication of poppy cultivation. Quite the opposite.

The Taliban prohibition had indeed caused “the beginning of a heroin shortage in Europe by the end of 2001″, as acknowledged by the UNODC.

Heroin is a multibillion dollar business supported by powerful interests, which requires a steady and secure commodity flow. One of the “hidden” objectives of the war was precisely to restore the CIA sponsored drug trade to its historical levels and exert direct control over the drug routes.

Immediately following the October 2001 invasion, opium markets were restored. Opium prices spiraled. By early 2002, the opium price (in dollars/kg) was almost 10 times higher than in 2000.

In 2001, under the Taliban opiate production stood at 185 tons, increasing to 3400 tons in 2002 under the US sponsored puppet regime of President Hamid Karzai.

While highlighting Karzai’s patriotic struggle against the Taliban, the media fails to mention that Karzai collaborated with the Taliban. He had also been on the payroll of a major US oil company, UNOCAL. In fact, since the mid-1990s, Hamid Karzai had acted as a consultant and lobbyist for UNOCAL in negotiations with the Taliban. According to the Saudi newspaper Al-Watan:

“Karzai has been a Central Intelligence Agency covert operator since the 1980s. He collaborated with the CIA in funneling U.S. aid to the Taliban as of 1994 when the Americans had secretly and through the Pakistanis [specifically the ISI] supported the Taliban’s assumption of power.” (quoted in Karen Talbot, U.S. Energy Giant Unocal Appoints Interim Government in Kabul, Global Outlook, No. 1, Spring 2002. p. 70. See also BBC Monitoring Service, 15 December 2001)

History of the Golden Crescent Drug trade

It is worth recalling the history of the Golden Crescent drug trade, which is intimately related to the CIA’s covert operations in the region since the onslaught of the Soviet-Afghan war and its aftermath.

Prior to the Soviet-Afghan war (1979-1989), opium production in Afghanistan and Pakistan was directed to small regional markets. There was no local production of heroin. (Alfred McCoy, Drug Fallout: the CIA’s Forty Year Complicity in the Narcotics Trade. The Progressive, 1 August 1997).

The Afghan narcotics economy was a carefully designed project of the CIA, supported by US foreign policy.

As revealed in the Iran-Contra and Bank of Commerce and Credit International (BCCI) scandals, CIA covert operations in support of the Afghan Mujahideen had been funded through the laundering of drug money. “Dirty money” was recycled –through a number of banking institutions (in the Middle East) as well as through anonymous CIA shell companies–, into “covert money,” used to finance various insurgent groups during the Soviet-Afghan war, and its aftermath:

“Because the US wanted to supply the Mujahideen rebels in Afghanistan with stinger missiles and other military hardware it needed the full cooperation of Pakistan. By the mid-1980s, the CIA operation in Islamabad was one of the largest US intelligence stations in the World. `If BCCI is such an embarrassment to the US that forthright investigations are not being pursued it has a lot to do with the blind eye the US turned to the heroin trafficking in Pakistan’, said a US intelligence officer. (“The Dirtiest Bank of All,” Time, July 29, 1991, p. 22.)

The Spoils of War: Afghanistan?s Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
 
estimates are as high as $500 billion a year.... many accuse the usa of invading Afghanistan solely to protect the heroin trade, which the taliban outlawed a few months before they attacked the world trade center. Many soldiers claimed they were stationed in Afghanistan specifically to guard poppy fields, and nothing more, specifically British soldiers for some reason



The Spoils of War: Afghanistan?s Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

We're not defending heroin, per se, but we're certainly defending the main source of opiates, which is a big bidness in this country.
 
We're not defending heroin, per se, but we're certainly defending the main source of opiates, which is a big bidness in this country.

about 90% of poppy plants in the world grow in afghanistan, the land used to grow poppy is bigger then texas

 
about 90% of poppy plants in the world grow in afghanistan, the land used to grow poppy is bigger then texas



I know. Opiates come from poppies too. One of the main reasons heroin is back in a big way is because people who get hooked on opioids need a cheaper fix.
 
estimates are as high as $500 billion a year.... many accuse the usa of invading Afghanistan solely to protect the heroin trade, which the taliban outlawed a few months before they attacked the world trade center. Many soldiers claimed they were stationed in Afghanistan specifically to guard poppy fields, and nothing more, specifically British soldiers for some reason



The Spoils of War: Afghanistan?s Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

There was good reason for that accusation. The Taliban had it nearly extinguished by the time Bush got there and it's flourishing now. Everybody's seen all the pictures of US soldiers patrolling in the poppy fields.
 
I know. Opiates come from poppies too. One of the main reasons heroin is back in a big way is because people who get hooked on opioids need a cheaper fix.

You seem somewhat reticent to make the obvious connection though?
 
Back
Top Bottom