• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White Supremacist Groups see Trump Bump

Nice try, but this isn't about me. It's about you claiming that ocean defended the KKK. You still can't point to a single post where he said something kind, defensive, positive or otherwise about the KKK. The reason for that? He never did.

You made something up that wasn't true, and when called on it, began flailing and flopping. It's ugly to lie - and you lied.

yeah by comparing the KKK, to BLM he's defending them, if he had compared the girl scouts to the KKK he is either defending the KKK or saying some pretty messed up things about the girls scouts.

what don't you understand about that?
 
yeah by comparing the KKK, to BLM he's defending them, if he had compared the girl scouts to the KKK he is either defending the KKK or saying some pretty messed up things about the girls scouts.

what don't you understand about that?
What do you not understand about using quotes to support your case?
 
No, I don't think I will give it a break. I think when millions are injected by Socialist Progressives into the creation of a group designed to bring about racial discord and disharmony, and is designed to intimidate and threaten, the truth must be presented.

Too bad if you can't handle the truth.

:doh Clearly, you know nothing about this organization, how it was formed, who its founders are or what the movement is really about. I hesitate to enlighten you considering 26 pages in and well over 210 post and you're still regurgitating the same false, wrongheaded non-sense. But I'll do my part and at least try to make you aware.

What is the Black Lives Matter movement really about? About | Black Lives Matter

Who are the founders/co-founders of Black Lives Matters? Meet the women co-founders of Black Lives Matters

Patrisse Cullors | Patrisse Cullors

Alicia Garza | National Domestic Workers Alliance

Opal Tometi - Discover the Networks (Note: The most radical of the three women)
 
Last edited:
yeah by comparing the KKK, to BLM he's defending them, if he had compared the girl scouts to the KKK he is either defending the KKK or saying some pretty messed up things about the girls scouts.

what don't you understand about that?

So no quote, in other words.
 
:doh Clearly, you know nothing about this organization, how it was formed, who its founders are or what the movement is really about. I hesitate to enlighten you considering 26 pages in and well over 210 post and you're still regurgitating the same false, wrongheaded non-sense. But I'll do my part and at least try to make you aware.

What is the Black Lives Matter movement really about? About | Black Lives Matter

Who are the founders/co-founders of Black Lives Matters? Meet the women co-founders of Black Lives Matters

Patrisse Cullors | Patrisse Cullors

Alicia Garza | National Domestic Workers Alliance

Opal Tometi - Discover the Networks (Note: The most radical of the three women)

Clearly you buy the BS spread by these people.

Perhaps you should learn who backed them, funded them, and plans to expand that funding to continue their racist actions.

Here is a starting point. I won't waste my time providing additional facts, since it would be fruitless.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/major-donors-consider-funding-black-lives-matter-215814

Some of the biggest donors on the left plan to meet behind closed doors next week in Washington with leaders of the Black Lives Matter movement and their allies to discuss funding the burgeoning protest movement, POLITICO has learned.

The meetings are taking place at the annual winter gathering of the Democracy Alliance major liberal donor club, which runs from Tuesday evening through Saturday morning and is expected to draw Democratic financial heavyweights, including Tom Steyer and Paul Egerman.​

“Major donors are usually not as radical or confrontational as activists most in touch with the pain of oppression,” said Steve Phillips, a Democracy Alliance member and significant contributor to Democratic candidates and causes. He donated to a St. Louis nonprofit group called the Organization for Black Struggle that helped organize 2014 Black Lives Matter-related protests in Ferguson, Missouri, over the police killing of a black teenager named Michael Brown. And Phillips and his wife, Democracy Alliance board member Susan Sandler, are in discussions about funding other groups involved in the movement.​
 
Donald Trump Las Vegas rally hit by 'Nazi salutes', scuffles and Black Lives Matter protests

In one a man can be heard saying "Light that m*********** on fire" as members of security wrestled an African American demonstrator who resisted being removed from the room. Others reportedly shouted "Shoot him" and "Kick his ass" while a middle-aged man went as far as exclaiming "Sieg heil!" [Hail victory] and mimicking the salute used in Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler, according to NBC News.​


Let those true colors show trump supporters. Let them out for all to see.
 
I don't believe I have written, nor implied, that BLM is oppressing police. You must be joking to think I have.

All you've done since your post #149 is dance around your own claims that BLM "oppresses and intimidates". While you've never said directly exactly who BLM oppresses or intimidates, you offered up the many videos posted online that people can view to determine who the movement oppresses and intimidates (your post #204). Since the majority of those videos are of angry BLM protesters chanting anti-cop rhetoric, the only logical conclusion one can reach is that BLM attempts to oppress and intimidate local police. (my post #253) Of course, this is impossible since it IS the police who are doing the intimidating and oppressing as this article makes clear. Alabama cops systematically framed Blacks by planting drugs and guns for decades And that's just one such story. There are thousands of instances of evidence planting by cops against Blacks that go back decades. But that's an entirely different topic altogether. Were BLM, their focus is on police brutality and murder or Blacks that tends to go un-prosecuted.

So, if it's not the cops, then who?

Politicians? There certainly have been a few gate crashes at presidential rallies, but I wouldn't call that intimidation...it's more like harassment. As for oppression...huh...no.

Society? I certainly don't feel oppressed by this group. Do you? Of course not. If anything, I've been alittle bit more enlightened by them, whereas, you've clearly been appalled. But no oppression or intimidation here. Moving on...

Business owners? Maybe, especially when rioting breaks out and people lose their damned minds! That certainly IS intimidating while the act of rioting is taking place. But once things settle down, it's "business as usual". No oppression or intimidation after-the-fact.

So, we're right back to my initial question (my post #153): Who exactly is BLM oppressing and intimidating because it's clearly not obvious to me.

Clearly you buy the BS spread by these people.

Perhaps you should learn who backed them, funded them, and plans to expand that funding to continue their racist actions.

You use an article dated 11/13/2015 of a planned meeting between Liberal fundraisers and BLM leaders that took place a week later to support your claim of social progressive financing? H-I-L-A-R-I-O-U-S! I've provided you with linked information as to who and how the BLM movement began and who its founders are - business women, of which at least two are political activist and all you've got to support your claim is an article that discusses a "planned meeting" at some point in the future to discuss donor contributions and collaborative efforts? You really do know how to reach for the BS don't you?
 
Last edited:
All you've done since your post #149 is dance around your own claims that BLM "oppresses and intimidates". While you've never said directly exactly who BLM oppresses or intimidates, you offered up the many videos posted online that people can view to determine who the movement oppresses and intimidates (your post #204). Since the majority of those videos are of angry BLM protesters chanting anti-cop rhetoric, the only logical conclusion one can reach is that BLM attempts to oppress and intimidate local police. (my post #253) Of course, this is impossible since it IS the police who are doing the intimidating and oppressing as this article makes clear. Alabama cops systematically framed Blacks by planting drugs and guns for decades And that's just one such story. There are thousands of instances of evidence planting by cops against Blacks that go back decades. But that's an entirely different topic altogether. Were BLM, their focus is on police brutality and murder or Blacks that tends to go un-prosecuted.

So, if it's not the cops, then who?

Politicians? There certainly have been a few gate crashes at presidential rallies, but I wouldn't call that intimidation...it's more like harassment. As for oppression...huh...no.

Society? I certainly don't feel oppressed by this group. Do you? Of course not. If anything, I've been alittle bit more enlightened by them, whereas, you've clearly been appalled. But no oppression or intimidation here. Moving on...

Business owners? Maybe, especially when rioting breaks out and people lose their damned minds! That certainly IS intimidating while the act of rioting is taking place. But once things settle down, it's "business as usual". No oppression or intimidation after-the-fact.

So, we're right back to my initial question (my post #153): Who exactly is BLM oppressing and intimidating because it's clearly not obvious to me.



You use an article dated 11/13/2015 of a planned meeting between Liberal fundraisers and BLM leaders that took place a week later to support your claim of social progressive financing? H-I-L-A-R-I-O-U-S! I've provided you with linked information as to who and how the BLM movement began and who its founders are - business women, of which at least two are political activist and all you've got to support your claim is an article that discusses a "planned meeting" at some point in the future to discuss donor contributions and collaborative efforts? You really do know how to reach for the BS don't you?

Why are you attempting to side step the facts? Is it by design, or is it that you are not willing to accept what BLM is doing?

To what end is storming a college library, disrupting students, and getting in their face? Are the students members of the local police union?

Dartmouth students lead profane Black Lives Matter protest

To what end does demanding safe spaces and promoting aggressive racist rallies have to do with demanding action on Police matters?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/12/us/racial-discrimination-protests-ignite-at-colleges-across-the-us.html?_r=0


It is your choice to ignore facts. Side step them, spin them, ignore them. To deny them outright amounts to nothing in the face of them. Socialist Progressive .01%'ers provided the funds to grow BLM, as the article in Politico showed. Socialist Progressive .01%'ers are planning to provide more money to enable BLM to spread more discord, disharmony, and chaos.
 
Why are you attempting to side step the facts? Is it by design, or is it that you are not willing to accept what BLM is doing?

To what end is storming a college library, disrupting students, and getting in their face? Are the students members of the local police union?

Dartmouth students lead profane Black Lives Matter protest

To what end does demanding safe spaces and promoting aggressive racist rallies have to do with demanding action on Police matters?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/12/us/racial-discrimination-protests-ignite-at-colleges-across-the-us.html?_r=0


It is your choice to ignore facts. Side step them, spin them, ignore them. To deny them outright amounts to nothing in the face of them. Socialist Progressive .01%'ers provided the funds to grow BLM, as the article in Politico showed. Socialist Progressive .01%'ers are planning to provide more money to enable BLM to spread more discord, disharmony, and chaos.

What exactly am I sidestepping? You're the one who claimed that the movement was oppressive, intimidating and funded by left-wing Social Progressive financiers. When challenged to prove your claim you've avoided it. You've used ONE highly partisan report from Politico.com of a tentatively scheduled meeting between BLM and Liberal donors that has yet to be proven actually occurred, and now this ONE report of antagonism at Dartmouth College by Black students who I admit went way overboard. But that's one on-campus incident; hardly measures up to your claims about the movement as a whole. Nonetheless, I agree with you that their action against White students has nothing to do with police brutality. So, IMO, these on-campus BLM affiliates need to check themselves in that regard. But you can't blame one rouge, isolated on-campus incident on an entire movement when you have no proof that their marching orders came directly from BLM-HQ. From the looks of it, the students were acting on their own.

Regardless, I'm not ignoring facts. Just arguing that you've got the facts wrong!
 
Back
Top Bottom