'Spinning up as we speak': Email shows Pentagon was ready to roll as Benghazi attack

Re: 'Spinning up as we speak': Email shows Pentagon was ready to roll as Benghazi att

Grant said:

Right. It wasn't a war in traditional terms nor in modern terms. It was just a matter of killing the leader of another sovereign nation which, as we know, has led to chaos.
Also this was where Barry Obama famously said "We are leading from behind", the first time in US history such a thing occurred.

And it was "wise" of Obama not to send in ground troops? Why? What would be the point? They only wanted to have Qaddafi killed in order to....In order to what? Why did they have him killed? Is there an excuse somewhere that you find credible?

Click to expand...

Yeah, yeah, there you go again. Shame on Obama for not sending in tens of thousands more of our troops where they aren't wanted and aren't needed, so that hundreds of them can come home in pine boxes...all to satisfy your rah-rah-testosterone-'Merica! impulse.

And if you'd paid attention, you'd know that WE did NOT "have Qaddafi killed" - that was something the rebels wanted to do and did. But I guess you wouldn't know much about that since Fox News didn't report too well in that respect since they were too busy claiming Obama's a secret Muslim trying to implement Sharia Law and mandatory homosexuality in our classrooms....

Re: 'Spinning up as we speak': Email shows Pentagon was ready to roll as Benghazi att

Glen Contrarian said:

Yeah, yeah, there you go again. Shame on Obama for not sending in tens of thousands more of our troops where they aren't wanted and aren't needed, so that hundreds of them can come home in pine boxes...all to satisfy your rah-rah-testosterone-'Merica! impulse.

Click to expand...

You clearly don't have a handle on the facts, much less understanding what I actually said. Do you know what the US casualties were in Iraq when Obama pulled the troops, claiming it was "independent and sovereign"?: Why not look it up in order to gain a better understanding and a qualification to debate.

And if you'd paid attention, you'd know that WE did NOT "have Qaddafi killed" - that was something the rebels wanted to do and did.

Click to expand...

Obama Boasts of Libya Success In U.N. Speech

But I guess you wouldn't know much about that since Fox News didn't report too well in that respect since they were too busy claiming Obama's a secret Muslim trying to implement Sharia Law and mandatory homosexuality in our classrooms....

Click to expand...

I don't believe you are as thick as that statement implies. It was probably just an emotional outburst.

Re: 'Spinning up as we speak': Email shows Pentagon was ready to roll as Benghazi att

Grant said:

You clearly don't have a handle on the facts, much less understanding what I actually said. Do you know what the US casualties were in Iraq when Obama pulled the troops, claiming it was "independent and sovereign"?: Why not look it up in order to gain a better understanding and a qualification to debate.

Click to expand...

what is it about cons (and con like posters) who think their delusions are fact and others have to verify them. If you have a point you would make it. You wouldn't have to ask a question as if you are making point. Something tells me based on this post, we wont be getting an explanation (a factual one at least) of your "point" any time soon

Grant said:

I'm very familiar with SOFA and it had nothing to do with Obama withdrawing the troops from Iraq. Please don't start that canard again.

Click to expand...