• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donald trump calls for barring Muslims from entering US

David_N

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2015
Messages
6,562
Reaction score
2,769
Location
The United States
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
I wish I was joking. Does he even recognize that this is what ISIS wants?
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...s-for-banning-muslims-from-entering-u-s/?_r=0
Donald J. Trump called on Monday for the United States to bar all Muslims from entering the country until the nation’s leaders can “figure out what is going on,” an extraordinary escalation of his harsh rhetoric aimed at members of the Islamic faith in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif.
 
Since when has he been punished for this kind of rhetoric? He's clearly being rewarded for it by his supporters, so there's no reason to think this trend of demagoguery is going to discontinue.

That's the thing, Donald trump is bringing out the worst in people, and they love him for it. Let's see how the other GOP candidates respond..
 
This is great news for the Democratic Party as it should clinch his nomination with far right voters and the know nothings who tend to favor crap like this. And then look like they are controlling things in the GOP primary season.
....and great news for ISIS. When ISIS is releasing propaganda to recruit fighters, it's pretty easy to say that Trump speaks for all of us. I mean, if you wanted a cartoon villain it's hard to do better than Trump.
 
....and great news for ISIS. When ISIS is releasing propaganda to recruit fighters, it's pretty easy to say that Trump speaks for all of us. I mean, if you wanted a cartoon villain it's hard to do better than Trump.

Will these xenophobic idiots ever recognize that ISIS wants us to turn away Muslims?
 
Will these xenophobic idiots ever recognize that ISIS wants us to turn away Muslims?

Well lookie here!

We got us an A-thar-o-tee on ISIS!

:roll:
 
Anyone else need any more proof that this man is a bigot?
 

I would hazard to guess that you could find comparable if not better material at a better price (free) through the Combating Terrorism Center.

I'd also be interested in any research Sageman is supervising at the FPRI.

And I'm sure SOCOM and/or SOCCENT are putting out some good stuff.

I'm not saying that isn't a good book as I wouldn't know since I haven't read it, nor am I saying that McCants is a slouch, he isn't.

But I wouldn't consider a policy wonk with no practical experience in anything of note the authority.
 
Well lookie here!

We got us an A-thar-o-tee on ISIS!

Well soot, I was going to smack you down for the ignorance of this comment, but it appears that was done in Post #8 and #10.
 
I wouldn't vote for anyone that wants to profile anyone from any religion or assumes a "guilty until prove otherwise" position based on one's beliefs. I may very much dislike Hillary Clinton and the Democrat's proposed policies, but now if Trump gets the nomination I might have to vote for Hillary as a lesser of two very very big evils.... I might not like her, but at least she seems smarter and more tactful than Trump. I'd prefer to have that and maybe a House/Senate that curbs her agenda than have Trump in the White House saying bigoted or evil things and instigating trouble wherever he goes.
 
I would hazard to guess that you could find comparable if not better material at a better price (free) through the Combating Terrorism Center.

I'd also be interested in any research Sageman is supervising at the FPRI.

And I'm sure SOCOM and/or SOCCENT are putting out some good stuff.

I'm not saying that isn't a good book as I wouldn't know since I haven't read it, nor am I saying that McCants is a slouch, he isn't.

But I wouldn't consider a policy wonk with no practical experience in anything of note the authority.


I doubt that your sources actually took a look at what makes Daesh tick.

That requires reading and analyzing the the sources that Daesh draw inspiration from.
 
No, he doens't. This is the begining of his dropping out the race, so he's going to make as much noise as he can while he gets the free air time to sell his brand.

The saddest thing about all of this with him is that he's going to make money. It, doesn't say much about our country, I'll tell you that.

And if he actually intends to stay for the long haul?
 
I wish I was joking. Does he even recognize that this is what ISIS wants?
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...s-for-banning-muslims-from-entering-u-s/?_r=0

Anyone who supports Trump and this disgusting tripe he endorses, best prepare for those who attack and either injure or kill innocent Muslims. When you support this, then prepare for the repercussions of raising the level of hate directed at Muslims which is what Trump is doing.

There will be more attacks, it is the nature of the world we live in.
Whether in the EU- NA- Africa,- Asia, attacks will occur.
People will die. Perhaps hundreds, who knows.
Then repercussion by wackos will follow.
Innocent Muslims will be attacked and or die. Do you suppoort that?
You do if you support Trumps hate rhetoric directed at Muslims. Deny it all you want, but prepare for the results.
 
He's getting crazier and crazier, so I don't see it.

All designed to make the other wackos running on the GOP side to look normal. Ted Cruz is polling ahead of The Donald in Iowa right now. Trump is making Ted Cruz look like a reasonable choice. You know, because people are stupid.
 
Well soot, I was going to smack you down for the ignorance of this comment, but it appears that was done in Post #8 and #10.

Really?

As far as post #8 goes, cite me chapter and verse where McCants is agreeing that turning away refugees is "what ISIS wants".

While you're doing that research, note McCants opinions of the Obama administration's "policy" (if you can even call his disorganized grabasstic response a "policy) toward ISIS.

I think you'll be surprised what you find.

Or on second thought, no, you won't, because you're starting from zero and anything you learn will be new to you.

As far as post #10 is concerned, yeah, a socialist career politician who was given a job as a UN high commissioner because of who he knows, rather than what he knows doesn't really count as an authority on anything.

But of course you don't really know anything more about Guterres than you do about McCants or this topic more generally.

I'll tell you what, why don't you reserve your "slapping downs" for topics you actually know a little something about?

Or, as usual, just pop off ignorantly because you've noted that someone might possibly have said something that could be perceived as being untoward toward non-white male Christian Americans.

:roll:

LOL, you would "slap me down".
 
I wish I was joking. Does he even recognize that this is what ISIS wants?
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...s-for-banning-muslims-from-entering-u-s/?_r=0

I do not think Trump has any clue as to the danger his rhetoric puts us in.

It is no longer amusing watching whom Trump appeals to just to illustrate prejudices among some in a party, and it is no longer a source of politics to bring up his xenophobia. Ironically, Trump claiming to represent the group of Americans most concerned over our safety are championing the one person making it much worse.

His message by the end of the day tomorrow will be discussed across the greater Middle East region from all of their sources, and in all of those ideological circles. But worse than that, will be how ISIS plans to capitalize on how insane Trump is turning out to be.

ISIS and like minded organizations will now *want* Trump as President at all costs. His mouth gives them every excuse to go out and harm anything "west" and Trump as President creates a poster child for recruitment.

It is absolutely ****ing pathetic that this is the state of American politics. For this side of the pond, a 3rd grader will be able to whip the hell out of him in a post primary debate on this subject. Too bad for him it is looking like he will face Hillary in said debate, and this will get ugly quick.

The only thing that might save Independents to vote for Hillary, is watching that angry fool win the Republican nod. Forget what I said earlier, the further we go with this the more likely Independents and moderates will vote for Hillary... out of pure safety concern for the hate Trump would bring down on the US from a good third of the planet.
 
I'd like to read the statement, which is currently unavailable due to server overloads, before rendering a judgment on the veracity of the NY Times' assessment. The quotes selected weren't especially damning, which is rather strange given the thunderous statement Trump was apparently giving.

That being said, this portion of his website link gives credence to the NY Times' claims: "donald-j.-trump-statement-on-preventing-muslim-immigration."

If the intent and language of the statement indeed calls for a ban on all Muslim entry and immigration, then Trump has given yet another shameful message. Furthermore, until the primary season shakes out, I fear that the broad association of the Republican Party with this dangerous man will remain injurious in a race that should be the GOP's race to lose. His high unfavorables within the party notwithstanding, this man is still leading the polls.

While both party's primary season has been the greatest jump toward extremism since the mid-60s and early-1970s, I'm afraid that the GOP's primary has been especially heinous.
 
Back
Top Bottom